弹力线套扎手术与吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合手术治疗混合痔患者的疗效比较

Comparison of efficacy between ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoid and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoid in treating patients with mixed hemorrhoids

  • 摘要:
    目的 比较弹力线套扎手术(RPH)与吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合手术(PPH)对混合痔患者的疗效及对预后的影响。
    方法 将2022年11月—2023年10月在本院胃肠外科接受手术治疗的218例混合痔患者纳入本研究,根据手术方式的不同,将患者分为RPH组(n=108)和PPH组(n=110)。比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、手术治疗效果、术后并发症发生率和复发率; 采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分评估术前、术后24 h及首次排便时患者疼痛程度; 采用健康调查量表 36(SF-36)评估生活质量; 采用患者满意度调查问卷(PSQ)调查患者对手术治疗的满意程度。
    结果 RPH组治疗总有效率为88.89%, 高于PPH组的78.18%, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。RPH组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间较PPH组减少或缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。RPH组术后24 h、首次排便时VAS评分低于PPH组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后, RPH组和PPH组SF-36评分和PSQ评分均较术前提高,且RPH组较PPH组更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。RPH组术后并发症发生率低于PPH组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月, 2组复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
    结论 RPH和PPH均为治疗混合痔的有效术式, RPH在减少术后并发症和缩短住院时间方面优于PPH, 但二者术后复发率无显著差异。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To compare the efficacy and prognostic impact of ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoid (RPH) and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoid (PPH) in patients with mixed hemorrhoids.
    Methods A total of 218 patients with mixed hemorrhoids who underwent surgical treatment in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of our hospital from November 2022 to October 2023 were included in this study. According to differed surgical methods, the patients were divided into RPH group (n=108) and PPH group (n=110). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, surgical treatment outcomes, postoperative complication rates, and recurrence rates were compared between the two groups. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess pain degree of patients before surgery, 24 hours after surgery, and during the first defecation. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was employed to evaluate the quality of life, and the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) was used to investigate patients′satisfaction with the surgical treatment.
    Results The total effective rate of treatment in the RPH group was 88.89%, which was higher than 78.18% in the PPH group (P < 0.05). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay in the RPH group were shorter or less than those in the PPH group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores at 24 hours after surgery and during the first defecation in the RPH group were lower than those in the PPH group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). After surgery, the SF-36 and PSQ scores in both the RPH and PPH groups were higher than those before surgery, and the scores in the RPH group were higher than those in the PPH group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the RPH group was lower than that in the PPH group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Six months after surgery, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rates between the two groups (P>0.05).
    Conclusion Both RPH and PPH are effective surgical methods for the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids. RPH is superior to PPH in reducing postoperative complications and shortening the length of hospital stay, but there is no significant difference in the postoperative recurrence rates between the two methods.

     

/

返回文章
返回