重症溃疡性结肠炎患者全结直肠切除-回肠贮袋肛管吻合术后肠梗阻发生风险的Nomogram模型及其外部验证

Nomogram model for prediction of risk of postoperative ileus in severe ulcerative colitis patients undergoing total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and its external validation

  • 摘要:
    目的 分析重症溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者全结直肠切除-回肠贮袋肛管吻合术(TPC-IPAA)后肠梗阻的发生风险, 构建Nomogram预测模型并进行验证。
    方法 选取2018年1月-2022年5月收治的278例行TPC-IPAA重症UC患者, 根据术后肠梗阻情况分为发生组(n=73)与未发生组(n=205)。另选取2022年6月-2023年4月收治的120例行TPC-IPAA重症UC患者为验证队列(建模队列与验证队列为7:3比例)。分析重症UC患者TPC-IPAA后肠梗阻的影响因素, 构建Nomogram预测模型; 采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线、决策曲线分析(DCA)评估Nomogram模型的区分度、一致性及临床实用性。
    结果 建模队列与验证队列患者一般资料比较, 差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);发生组与未发生组术前美国麻醉师协会(ASA)分级、术前白蛋白、腹部手术史、手术方式、手术时间、术中失血量和术后腹腔感染情况比较, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);术前ASA分级、术前白蛋白、腹部手术史、手术时间、术中失血量和术后腹腔感染均是重症UC患者TPC-IPAA后肠梗阻的独立影响因素(P < 0.05)。ROC曲线显示, Nomogram模型在建模队列、验证队列中预测重症UC患者TPC-IPAA后肠梗阻的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.782(95% CI: 0.723~0.842)、0.785(95% CI: 0.693~0.878), 模型区分度良好; 校准曲线显示, Nomogram模型一致性良好; DCA曲线提示Nomogram模型的临床实用性较高。
    结论 重症UC患者TPC-IPAA后肠梗阻风险受术前ASA分级、腹部手术史、术前白蛋白、术中失血量、手术时间和术后腹腔感染等因素影响, 基于此构建的Nomogram预测模型对肠梗阻发生风险具有较高预测效能。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To analyze the risk of postoperative ileus in severe ulcerative colitis (UC) patients undergoing total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (TPC-IPAA) and develop and validate a nomogram prediction model.
    Methods A total of 278 severe UC patients undergoing TPC-IPAA from January 2018 to May 2022 were enrolled and divided into ileus group (n=73) and non-ileus group (n=205) based on the occurrence of postoperative ileus. Another 120 severe UC patients undergoing TPC-IPAA from June 2022 to April 2023 were selected as validation cohort (with a 7-to-3 ratio between the modeling cohort and the validation cohort). Factors influencing postoperative ileus in severe UC patients undergoing TPC-IPAA were analyzed to construct a Nomogram prediction model. The discrimination, consistency, and clinical utility of the Nomogram model were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
    Results There were no significant differences in general characteristics between the modeling cohort and the validation cohort (P>0.05). Significant differences were observed in preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, preoperative albumin level, history of abdominal surgery, surgical approach, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative intra-abdominal infection between the ileus group and the non-ileusgroup (P < 0.05). Preoperative ASA classification, preoperative albumin level, history of abdominal surgery, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative intra-abdominal infection were independent influencing factors for postoperative ileus in severe UC patients undergoing TPC-IPAA (P < 0.05). The ROC curve showed that the area under the curve of the Nomogram model for predicting postoperative ileus in severe UC patients undergoing TPC-IPAA was 0.782 (95%CI, 0.723 to 0.842) in the modeling cohort and 0.785 (95%CI, 0.693 to 0.878) in the validation cohort, indicating good discrimination of the model. The calibration curve demonstrated good consistency of the nomogram model. The DCA curve suggested high clinical utility of the Nomogram model.
    Conclusion The risk of postoperative ileus in severe UC patients undergoing TPC-IPAA is influenced by preoperative ASA classification, history of abdominal surgery, preoperative albumin level, intraoperative blood loss, operation duration, and postoperative intra-abdominal infection. The nomogram prediction model developed based on these factors has high predictive performance for the risk of postoperative ileus.

     

/

返回文章
返回