Abstract: Objective To explore the application effect of the dual-track nursing intervention model in the treatment process of children with lobar pneumonia. Methods A total of 186 children with lobar pneumonia were selected and randomly divided into control group and intervention group using a double-blind method, with 93 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing intervention, while the intervention group implemented the dual-track nursing intervention model on the basis of conventional nursing. This model included the establishment and training of nursing teams, personalized nursing plans, health education, and psychological support. Outside the hospital, it emphasized family support, regular follow-up guidance, and community-based collaborative education. Both groups received a 3-week intervention. The improvement times of clinical symptoms, hospital stay, pulmonary function indicators before and after nursing, treatment compliance, and family members' satisfaction with nursing were compared and analyzed between the two groups. Results The fever resolution time (3.89±0.96) d, cough relief time (6.21±1.34) d, disappearance time of pulmonary rales (7.89±1.56) d, and hospital stay duration (9.45±1.89) d in the intervention group were all shorter than those in the control group (5.23±1.14), (7.45±1.67), (9.32±2.01), and (11.28±2.35) d, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). After nursing, the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) (1.51±0.22) L, forced vital capacity (FVC) (1.75±0.25) L, and FEV₁/FVC (94.12±5.65)% in the intervention group were all higher than those in the control group (1.42±0.15) L, (1.66±0.22) L, and (85.73±8.41)%, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The scores for examination cooperation (23.91±3.82) points, nursing cooperation (24.19±4.03) points, standardized medication use (24.26±3.94) points, and rational diet (23.77±3.62) points in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group (20.16±3.53), (19.64±3.46), (23.05±3.68), and (18.85±3.41) points, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The satisfaction rate of family members with nursing work in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (98.92% versus 89.25%, P < 0.05). Conclusion The dual-track nursing intervention model has a significant application effect in children with lobar pneumonia. It can accelerate their recovery process, improve treatment compliance, promote pulmonary function improvement, and enhance family members' satisfaction.