乳腺癌患者ARID1A突变谱及其与临床预后的相关性

ARID1A mutation profile and its correlation with clinical prognosis in breast cancer patients

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨中国乳腺癌患者ARID1A突变谱及其与临床预后的相关性。
    方法 将METABRIC数据库中1 944例原发性乳腺癌患者和1 068例乳腺癌患者分别纳入METABRIC队列和癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)队列; 同时, 将874例广东省人民医院(GDPH)浸润性乳腺癌女性患者纳入GDPH队列。绘制GDPH队列基因突变瀑布图,比较不同队列ARID1A基因突变情况。
    结果 GDPH队列、TCGA队列和METABRIC队列患者携带ARID1A基因突变的患者比例分别为5.8%、3.7%和4.9%。3个队列中,无义突变、错义突变和移码突变是ARID1A突变患者中最常见的突变类型。在GDPH队列中, 6.3%的雌激素受体(ER)阳性患者发生ARID1A突变,高于其他队列发生ARID1A突变的ER阳性患者,并观察到10个新型突变。METABRIC队列中ARID1A基因突变的Luminal B型乳腺癌患者在4种分子亚型中占比最高(P=0.022)。在METABRIC队列中,激素受体(HR)阳性(+)乳腺癌ARID1A基因突变患者的中位生存期短于野生型患者的中位生存期,差异有统计学意义(P=0.023)。单因素和多因素分析显示, ARID1A基因突变不是HR(+)乳腺癌患者生存期的独立危险因素。
    结论 GDPH队列、TCGA队列和METABRIC队列患者可能存在ARID1A突变差异, ARID1A突变可能不是乳腺癌患者预后的危险因素。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the ARID1A mutation profile and its correlation with clinical prognosis in Chinese breast cancer patients.
    Methods A total of 1 944 primary breast cancer patients from the METABRIC database and 1068 breast cancer patients were enrolled in the METABRIC cohort and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort, respectively. Additionally, 874 female patients with invasive breast cancer from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (GDPH) were included in the GDPH cohort. A gene mutation waterfall plot was generated for the GDPH cohort, and ARID1A mutation status across different cohorts were compared.
    Results The proportions of patients carrying ARID1A mutations in the GDPH, TCGA, and METABRIC cohorts were 5.8%, 3.7%, and 4.9%, respectively. Nonsense, missense, and frameshift mutations were the most common types of ARID1A mutations across all three cohorts. In the GDPH cohort, 6.3% of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients exhibited ARID1A mutations, which was higher than the proportion of ER-positive patients with ARID1A mutations in other cohorts, and 10 novel mutations were identified. Among the four molecular subtypes in the METABRIC cohort, luminal B breast cancer patients with ARID1A mutations accounted for the highest proportion (P=0.022). In the METABRIC cohort, the median survival time of HR(+) breast cancer patients with ARID1A mutations was shorter than that of wild-type patients, with a statistically significant difference (P=0.023). However, univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that ARID1A mutation was not an independent risk factor for survival in HR(+) breast cancer patients.
    Conclusion There may be differences in ARID1A mutations among the GDPH, TCGA, and METABRIC cohorts patients, and ARID1A mutation may not be a risk factor for prognosis in breast cancer patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回