活血化瘀法联合氢溴酸山莨菪碱治疗脓毒症相关凝血病的疗效观察

Efficacy of combined therapy of promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis and anisodamine hydrobromide for sepsis-induced coagulopathy

  • 摘要:
    目的 探究活血化瘀法联合氢溴酸山莨菪碱治疗脓毒症相关凝血病(SIC)的临床疗效。
    方法 选取2021年9月-2024年9月在本院接受治疗的102例SIC患者为研究对象, 根据治疗方式不同分为对照组(n=51)和实验组(n=51)。对照组进行常规治疗, 实验组在对照组基础上增加活血化瘀法联合氢溴酸山莨菪碱治疗。分别于治疗前和治疗后24、48、72 h评估2组凝血功能、血栓风险, 同时比较临床疗效、治疗安全性, 并于治疗前和治疗后2、6、24 h检测乳酸清除率。
    结果 与治疗前比较, 2组患者治疗后的凝血酶时间(TT)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、D-二聚体(D-D)水平均下降, 而血小板(PLT)计数和纤维蛋白原(FIB)水平则升高, 差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗后24 h, 实验组TT、PT及D-D水平低于对照组, 差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05), 其余指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后48 h, 实验组TT、PT、APTT、D-D水平较对照组降低, PLT水平较对照组升高, 差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗后72 h, 实验组TT、PT、APTT水平较对照组降低, 而PLT和FIB水平升高, 差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。2组患者的血栓新四项指标, 即血栓调节蛋白(TM)、凝血酶-抗凝血酶复合物(TAT)、纤溶酶-α2-纤溶酶抑制物复合物(PIC)、组织型纤溶酶原激活物-纤溶酶原激活抑制物复合物(t-PAIC)水平均随治疗时间延长而下降, 部分时点差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗24 h后, 实验组TM、TAT水平低于对照组, 差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);治疗48 h后, 实验组TM、PIC及t-PAIC水平较对照组降低, 差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);治疗72 h后, 实验组血栓新四项指标水平均低于对照组, 但仅TM和PIC水平差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。2组患者的血栓弹力图指标R值、K值、最大振幅(MA)均随治疗时间延长而下降, 而α角增大, 差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗后24、48 h, 实验组R值低于对照组, 差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);治疗后72 h, 实验组R值、MA均低于对照组, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。2组患者治疗后的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、SIC评分以及急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ评分均较治疗前下降, 且实验组低于对照组, 差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。2组患者的乳酸清除率均随治疗时间延长而升高, 差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗后2、6、24 h, 实验组乳酸清除率均高于对照组, 差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。28 d生存率结果显示, 实验组28 d生存率为100.00%, 高于对照组的92.16%, 差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论 活血化瘀法联合氢溴酸山莨菪碱治疗SIC的临床疗效良好, 能改善患者凝血功能, 降低血栓风险, 具有较高的治疗安全性。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of the combined therapy of promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis and anisodamine hydrobromide in the treatment of sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC).
    Methods A total of 102 SIC patients treated in our hospital from September 2021 to September 2024 were selected as study subjects.They were divided into control group (n=51) and experimental group (n=51) according to different treatment methods.The control group received conventional treatment, while the experimental group received an additional combined therapy of promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis and anisodamine hydrobromide on the basis of the control group.Coagulation function and thrombotic risk were assessed in both groups before treatment and at 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment.Clinical efficacy and treatment safety were compared, and lactate clearance rate was measured before treatment and at 2, 6, and 24 h after treatment.
    Results After treatment, the levels of thrombin time (TT), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and D-dimer (D-D) decreased, while the platelet (PLT) count and fibrinogen (FIB) levels increased compared with treatment before, with all differences being statistically significant (P < 0.05).At 24 hours post-treatment, the TT, PT, and D-D levels in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were observed in the remaining indicators (P>0.05).At 48 hours post-treatment, the TT, PT, APTT, and D-D levels in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, while the PLT level was higher (P < 0.05).At 72 hours post-treatment, the TT, PT, and APTT levels in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, whereas the PLT and FIB levels were higher (P < 0.05).The levels of the four new thrombotic indicators, namely thrombomodulin (TM), thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), plasmin-α2-antiplasmin complex (PIC), and tissue plasminogen activator-plasminogen activator inhibitor complex (t-PAIC), decreased with prolonged treatment duration in both groups, with differences in different time points being statistically significant (P < 0.05).At 24 hours post-treatment, the TM and TAT levels in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, with both differences being statistically significant (P < 0.05).At 48 hours post-treatment, the TM, PIC, and t-PAIC levels in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05).At 72 hours post-treatment, the levels of four indicators thrombosis in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, but only the differences in TM and PIC levels were statistically significant (P < 0.05).The thromboelastography indicators, including R value, K value, and maximum amplitude (MA) decreased, while α angle increased with prolonged treatment duration in both groups (P < 0.05).At 24 and 48 hours post-treatment, the R value in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, with both differences being statistically significant (P < 0.05).At 72 hours post-treatment, the R value, and MA in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05).The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, SIC score, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ score decreased post-treatment in both groups compared with pretreatment levels, and were lower in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05).The lactate clearance rate increased with prolonged treatment duration in both groups (P < 0.05).At 2, 6, and 24 hours post-treatment, the lactate clearance rate in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05).The 28-day survival rate was 100.00% in the experimental group, which was higher than 92.16% in the control group (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion The combined therapy of promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis and anisodamine hydrobromide has good clinical efficacy in the treatment of SIC.It can improve patients'coagulation function, reduce thrombotic risk, and has high treatment safety.

     

/

返回文章
返回