未生育青少年女性重复流产现状及避孕情况分析

Recurrent abortion status and contraceptive condition among nulliparous adolescent females

  • 摘要:
    目的 分析未生育青少年女性重复流产现状及避孕情况。
    方法 收集2019年7月—2024年6月至少有1次人工流产或药物流产史且本次妊娠仍要求行人工流产或药物流产的未生育青少年女性的流产及避孕数据,分析重复流产的影响因素。
    结果 本研究纳入年龄15~24岁的未生育青少年女性非重复流产者3 081例(人工流产1 983例,药物流产1 098例),重复流产者804例(人工流产475例,药物流产329例)。未生育青少年女性重复流产者与非重复流产者在年龄构成、婚姻状况、户籍及文化程度等方面差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,年龄≤19岁(OR=1.21, 95%CI: 0.93~1.73)、高中及以下文化水平(OR=2.13, 95%CI: 1.77~2.82)、未婚(OR=1.92, 95%CI: 1.25~2.64)及非本地户籍(OR=2.68, 95%CI: 2.19~3.63)的未生育青少年女性复发性流产风险增加。未生育青少年女性中,重复流产者未采取避孕措施的占比为62.8%(505/804), 高于非重复流产者的28.1%(865/3 081), 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001); 重复流产与非重复流产者采取具体避孕措施的占比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05), 但重复流产者采用避孕措施的占比为37.2%(299/804), 低于非重复流产者的71.9%(2 216/3 081), 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。重复流产者采用宫内节育器避孕措施的占比仅为0.3%。
    结论 年龄小、文化程度低、未婚、非本地户籍是未生育青少年女性复发性流产的高危因素; 未避孕或采用低效避孕措施是重复人工流产的主要原因。医务人员加强流产后关爱及青少年女性避孕知识宣教,推广高效避孕措施,对降低重复人工流产率具有重要意义。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To analyze the current status of recurrent abortion and contraceptive condition among nulliparous adolescent females.
    Methods Data on abortion and contraception were collected from nulliparous adolescent females aged 15 to 24 years who had at least one history of induced or medical abortion and still requested induced or medical abortion for the current pregnancy between July 2019 and June 2024. The influencing factors of recurrent abortion were analyzed.
    Results The study included 3, 081 cases of non-recurrent abortion (including 1, 983 induced abortions, 1, 098 medical abortions) and 804 cases of recurrent abortion (including 475 induced abortions, 329 medical abortions) among nulliparous adolescent females. Statistically significant differences were observed between recurrent and non-recurrent abortion groups in terms of age composition, marital status, household registration, and educational level (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that nulliparous adolescent females aged ≤19 years (OR=1.21, 95%CI, 0.93 to 1.73), with high school education or below (OR=2.13, 95%CI, 1.77 to 2.82), unmarried (OR=1.92, 95%CI, 1.25 to 2.64), and non-local household registration (OR=2.68, 95%CI, 2.19 to 3.63) had an increased risk of recurrent abortion. Among nulliparous adolescent females, the proportion of those who did not use contraception was 62.8% (505/804) among those with a history of repeated abortions, which was significantly higher than that among those without a history of repeated abortions 28.1%(865/3, 081), P < 0.001. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of those using specific contraceptive methods between the two groups (P>0.05), the proportion of those using contraception among those with a history of repeated abortions was 37.2%(299/804), which was significantly lower than that among those without a history of repeated abortions 71.9%(2, 216/3, 081), P < 0.001. Only 0.3% of those with a history of repeated abortions used intrauterine devices as a contraceptive method.
    Conclusion Young age, low educational level, being unmarried, and non-local household registration are high-risk factors for recurrent abortion among nulliparous adolescent females. Failure to use contraception or use of ineffective contraceptive methods is the main reason for recurrent induced abortion. Strengthening post-abortion care by medical staff and promoting contraceptive knowledge education and efficient contraceptive methods among adolescent females are of great significance in reducing the rate of recurrent induced abortion.

     

/

返回文章
返回