接纳承诺疗法改善冠状动脉介入术后患者心理状态研究

Research on the improvement of psychological state in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention by acceptance and commitment therapy

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨接纳承诺疗法(ACT)干预对冠状动脉介入术(PCI)患者术后心血管不良事件发生及心理状态的影响。
    方法 选取PCI术后患者80例,按照随机数字表法分为对照组和干预组,每组40例。对照组给予常规护理措施,干预组在常规护理基础上进行接纳承诺疗法的干预方案。统计2组患者干预后的心血管不良事件发生率,比较2组患者冠心病自我效能感表(CSES)评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分与心理灵活性接纳与行动问卷第2版(AAQ-Ⅱ)评分。
    结果 干预后干预组患者不良心血管事件发生率5.00%低于对照组的12.50%; 干预组CSES得分(45.53±3.81)分高于对照组的(39.23±3.62)分, SAS得分(46.09±3.62)分低于对照组的(54.63±2.45)分,SDS得分(49.53±2.87)分低于对照组的(52.24±2.45)分,干预组AAQ-Ⅱ得分(21.43±1.96)分低于对照组的(31.45±4.25)分,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论 ACT干预能够有效提高PCI术后患者的自我效能感和心理灵活性,改善焦虑抑郁情绪,降低心血管不良事件发生率。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the effects of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention on the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events and psychological state in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
    Methods A total of 80 patients after PCI were selected and randomly divided into control group and intervention group using a random number table method, with 40 cases in each group. The control group received routine nursing measures, while the intervention group received an ACT intervention program in addition to routine nursing. The incidence of cardiovascular adverse events after intervention was statistically analyzed in both groups. The scores of the coronary heart disease Self-efficacy Scale (CSES), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Ⅱ (AAQ-Ⅱ) were compared between the two groups.
    Results After intervention, the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in the intervention group (5.00%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (12.50%). The CSES score in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (45.53±3.81) versus (39.23±3.62), the SAS score was lower than that in the control group (46.09±3.62) versus (54.63±2.45), the SDS score was lower than that in the control group (49.53±2.87) versus (52.24±2.45), and the AAQ-Ⅱ score was lower than that in the control group (21.43±1.96) versus (31.45±4.25) (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion ACT intervention can effectively improve the self-efficacy and psychological flexibility of patients after PCI, alleviate anxiety and depression, and significantly reduce the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events.

     

/

返回文章
返回