基于德尔菲-层次分析法的麻醉重症监护室护理质量敏感指标体系构建及验证

Construction and validation of a sensitive indicator system for nursing quality in the anesthesia intensive care unit based on the Delphi-analytic hierarchy process method

  • 摘要:
    目的 构建麻醉重症监护室(AICU)护理质量敏感指标体系并验证其信效度, 为临床护理质量改进提供科学依据。
    方法 基于“三维质量结构”理论,针对AICU护理特点构建专科化质量指标体系。通过文献分析初步建立指标库,采用德尔菲专家咨询法进行2轮专家函询,运用层次分析法确定权重,验证指标体系的信效度。
    结果 第1轮函询问卷回收率为90.00%, 第2轮为97.78%; 2轮函询专家权威系数分别为0.826、0.885, 表明专家权威性较高。最终构建的指标体系包括3项一级指标要素质量(结构)、环节质量(过程)、终末质量(结果)、12项二级指标(结构维度4项、过程维度4项、结果维度4项)和43项三级指标(43项具体评价条目)。问卷各维度内部一致性系数均超过可接受标准(>0.7), 总问卷Cronbach's α系数达0.974, 提示信度良好; 第2轮专家函询结果显示, 44位评审专家评估的条目水平内容效度指数范围为0.84~1.00, 均高于合格标准(0.8), 量表水平内容效度指数为0.92, 超过推荐阈值(0.9)。
    结论 本研究构建并验证的AICU护理质量敏感指标体系,可有效弥补传统通用型护理质量评价工具在专科适应性方面的不足,可操作性强,能更好地指导临床护理质量控制。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To construct a sensitive indicator system for nursing quality in the anesthesia intensive care unit (AICU) and validate its reliability and validity, providing a scientific basis for improving clinical nursing quality.
    Methods Based on the "three-dimensional quality structure" theory, a specialized quality indicator system was constructed according to the nursing characteristics of the AICU. An indicator library was initially established through literature analysis. Two rounds of expert consultations were conducted using the Delphi expert consultation method. The analytic hierarchy process was employed to determine weights and validate the reliability and validity of the indicator system.
    Results The response rate of the first-round consultation questionnaire was 90.00%, and that of the second round was 97.78%. The expert authority coefficients for the two rounds of consultations were 0.826 and 0.885, respectively, indicating a high level of expert authority. The finally constructed indicator system included three primary indicatorselement quality (structure), process quality (process), and outcome quality (result), twelve secondary indicators (four in the structural dimension, four in the process dimension, and four in the outcome dimension), and forty-three tertiaryindicators (forty-three specific evaluation items). The internal consistency coefficients of all dimensions of the questionnaire exceeded the acceptable standard (>0.7), and the total questionnaire Cronbach's α coefficient reached 0.974, suggesting good reliability. The results of the second-round expert consultation showed that the item-level content validity index assessed by 44 review experts ranged from 0.84 to 1.00, all higher than the qualified standard (0.8), and the scale-level content validity index was 0.92, exceeding the recommended threshold (0.9).
    Conclusion The AICU nursing quality sensitive indicator system constructed and validated in this study can effectively compensate for the lack of specialty adaptability of traditional general nursing quality evaluation tools. It is highly operable and can better guide clinical nursing quality control.

     

/

返回文章
返回