基于真实世界研究的大便失禁与直肠脱垂术后复发的相关性

Correlation between fecal incontinence and postoperative recurrence of rectal prolapse based on real-world study

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨大便失禁与完全性直肠脱垂(CRP)术后复发风险的关联。
    方法 采用回顾性队列研究设计, 纳入2013年1月—2024年6月在中国中医科学院广安门医院行手术治疗的CRP患者为研究对象。采用2个连续的生存分析模型研究大便失禁与直肠脱垂术后复发的关系; 采用限制性立方样条回归研究二者的线性关系; 采用生存曲线反映不同程度失禁患者术后无复发生存概率情况。
    结果 本研究共纳入180例CRP患者,其中重度大便失禁者44例。多因素生存分析模型结果显示,在控制协变量后,大便失禁与术后复发风险具有显著相关性(P < 0.05)。以Wexner大便失禁评分≤5分为参照组, ≥16分组复发风险为参照组的4.26倍未调整模型: HR=4.3(1.62~11.41); 模型1: HR=3.37(1.27~8.94); 模型2: HR=4.26(1.48~12.24); P < 0.05, 表明高分患者复发风险显著升高。大便失禁与复发风险呈线性正相关(P非线性>0.05); 生存曲线表明,大便失禁不同分组间的无复发生存率存在显著差异; 评分≥16组生存概率急剧下降(9年时仅剩3例未复发),表明该组复发风险最高。
    结论 大便失禁是直肠脱垂术后复发的重要预测指标,其中重度大便失禁是独立的高危因素,临床需将大便失禁严重程度纳入术前风险评估体系,为优化手术方案、术后患者分层管理和预防术后复发提供循证依据。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the association between fecal incontinence and the risk of postoperative recurrence in patients with complete rectal prolapse (CRP).
    Methods A retrospective cohort study design was employed, CRP patients who underwent surgical treatment in the Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences from January 2013 to June 2024 were selected as the study subjects. Two sequential survival analysis models were used to explore the relationship between fecal incontinence and postoperative recurrence of rectal prolapse; restricted cubic spline regression was utilized to examine the linear relationship between the two indexes; survival curves were generated to illustrate the postoperative recurrence-free survival probabilities among patients with varying degrees of incontinence.
    Results A total of 180 CRP patients were included in this study, among whom 44 patients had severe fecal incontinence. The results of the multivariate survival analysis model revealed a significant correlation between fecal incontinence and the risk of postoperative recurrence after controlling for covariates (P < 0.05). Considering a Wexner fecal incontinence score ≤ 5 as reference group, the recurrence risk in the group with a score ≥ 16 was 4.26 times than that of the reference group unadjusted model: HR=4.3(1.62 to 11.41); model 1: HR= 3.37(1.27 to 8.94); model 2: HR=4.26(1.48 to 12.24); P < 0.05, indicating a significantly elevated recurrence risk in patients with high scores. A linear positive correlation was observed between fecal incontinence and recurrence risk (Pnon-linearity>0.05). The survival curves demonstrated significant differences in recurrence-free survival rates among different fecal incontinence groups. The survival probability in the group with a score ≥ 16 declined sharply (with only 3 cases remaining recurrence-free at 9 years), indicating the highest recurrence risk in this group.
    Conclusion Fecal incontinence is an important predictor of postoperative recurrence in rectal prolapse, with severe fecal incontinence serving as an independent high-risk factor. The severity of fecal incontinence should be incorporated into the preoperative risk assessment system in clinical practice to provide evidence-based support for optimizing surgical plans, stratified postoperative management, and preventing postoperative recurrence.

     

/

返回文章
返回