125I近距离放疗过程中伴耻骨弓干扰的前列腺癌患者的预后分析

Prognostic analysis in prostate cancer patients with pubic arch interference during 125I brachytherapy

  • 摘要:
    目的 观察125I近距离放疗过程中伴耻骨弓干扰(PAI)的前列腺癌患者的预后情况, 分析影响无生化复发生存期(bRFS)和总生存期(OS)的相关因素。
    方法 回顾性分析2013年7月—2020年12月于扬州大学附属苏北人民医院行125I粒子植入放疗的141例伴PAI的前列腺癌患者的临床资料。收集患者围术期相关数据和预后情况。采用LASSO回归分析筛选预测bRFS和OS的关键变量; 采用log-rank法对相关指标进行单因素分析; 采用Cox比例风险模型进行多因素分析,以筛选与bRFS和OS相关的影响因素。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线进行临床效果评价。
    结果 实际植入针数是bRFS的独立预测因素,最大耻骨弓干扰角度(AoPAImax)是OS的独立预测因素; 前列腺体积、临床T分期是bRFS的独立预测因素; 年龄是OS的独立预测因素(P < 0.05)。
    结论 对于伴PAI且前列腺体积较大者,接受近距离放疗和雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)均能达到较好的预后效果; T3期前列腺癌患者应考虑低剂量率近距离放射治疗(LDR-BT) 联合外照射治疗和ADT; 实际植入针数≥27针的患者预后情况较好; 年龄 < 75岁、AoPAImax < 20°的患者也可考虑将LDR-BT作为个性化确定性治疗方案。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To observe the prognosis of prostate cancer patients with pubic arch interference (PAI) during 125I brachytherapy and analyze the influencing factors of biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) and overall survival (OS).
    Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 141 prostate cancer patients with PAI who underwent 125I seed implantation brachytherapy at Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University from July 2013 to December 2020. Perioperative data and prognostic information of patients were collected. LASSO regression analysis was used to screen key variables as predictors of bRFS and OS. The log-rank method was employed for univariate analysis of relevant indicators, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis to identify factors associated with bRFS and OS. The Kaplan-Meier curve was utilized for clinical efficacy.
    Results The actual number of implanted needles was an independent predictor of bRFS, and the maximum pubic arch interference angle (AoPAImax) was an independent predictor of OS. Prostate volume and T staging were independent predictors of bRFS, and age was an independent predictor of OS (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion For patients with PAI and a large prostate volume, brachytherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can achieve a favorable prognosis. Patients with T3 prostate cancer should consider low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) combined with external beam radiation therapy and ADT. Patients with an actual number of implanted needles ≥ 27 have a better prognosis. LDR-BT should also be considered as a personalized definitive treatment option for patients aged < 75 years with an AoPAImax < 20°.

     

/

返回文章
返回