列线图模型预测乳腺癌术后合并焦虑抑郁风险的研究

Risk of anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients after surgery predicted by a nomogram model

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨乳腺癌(BC)术后患者合并焦虑抑郁的影响因素并构建列线图预测模型。
    方法 选择2022年1月—2024年12月宜宾市第一人民医院手术治疗的520例BC患者为研究对象,根据焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评估患者焦虑抑郁发生情况,并将其分为焦虑抑郁组和无焦虑抑郁组。采用Logistic回归分析明确可能的影响因素; 采用R语言和rms程序包建立列线图模型; 采用Hosmer-Lemeshow检验和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)评价列线图模型的校准度和区分度; 采用决策曲线分析(DCA)预测模型的净收益。
    结果 共发生焦虑抑郁265例,发生率为50.96%; 焦虑抑郁组患者年龄、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(PSQI)评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、疾病认知评分、领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)评分、中文版乳腺癌患者生命质量测定量表(FACT-B)评分、心理弹性量表(CD-RISC)评分、社会影响量表(SIS)评分、简化版恐惧疾病进展量表(FoP-Q-SF)评分、医保类型、手术方式和TNM临床分期与无焦虑抑郁组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。经Lasso回归筛选变量和Logistic回归分析发现,年龄小、TNM临床分期高、PSSS评分低、FACT-B评分低是BC术后患者合并焦虑抑郁的危险因素, OR(95%CI)分别为1.106(1.077~1.135)、4.438(2.404~8.190)、1.100(1.056~1.145)和1.043(1.021~1.065); 疼痛VAS评分低、SIS评分低和FoP-Q-SF评分低是BC术后患者合并焦虑抑郁的保护因素, OR(95%CI)分别为0.777(0.666~0.906)、0.928(0.893~0.965)和0.896(0.860~0.934)。构建的列线图模型有良好的区分度和校准度,模型组、内部验证组和外部验证组的ROC曲线AUC分别为0.885、0.859和0.856, 模型组、内部验证组和外部验证组最大偏移量分别为0.029(P=0.921)、0.042(P=0.867)和0.038(P=0.894)。
    结论 基于Logistic回归分析建立的列线图模型能较好预测BC术后患者焦虑抑郁风险。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the influencing factors of anxiety and depression in patients after breast cancer (BC) surgery and construct a nomogram prediction model.
    Methods A total of 520 BC patients who underwent surgical treatment at Yibin First People's Hospital from January 2022 to December 2024 were selected. The occurrence of anxiety and depression in patients was assessed using Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), and patients were divided into anxiety-depression group and non-anxiety-depression group. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential influencing factors. The R language and the rms package were used to establish the nomogram model. The calibration and discrimination of the nomogram model were evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to predict the net benefit of the model.
    Results A total of 265 cases of anxiety and depression occurred, with an incidence rate of 50.96%. There were statistically significant differences between the anxiety-depression group and the non-anxiety-depression group in terms of age, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, disease cognition score, Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) score, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) score, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) score, Social Impact Scale (SIS) score, Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-SF) score, medical insurance type, surgical method, and TNM clinical stage compared with the non-anxiety-depression group (P < 0.05). After variable screening by Lasso regression and Logistic regression analysis, it was found that younger age, higher TNM clinical stage, lower PSSS score, and lower FACT-B score were risk factors for anxiety and depression in patients after BC surgery, with OR (95%CI) of 1.106 (1.077 to 1.135), 4.438 (2.404 to 8.190), 1.100 (1.056 to 1.145), and 1.043 (1.021 to 1.065), respectively. Lower VAS score, lower SIS score, and lower FoP-Q-SF score were protective factors for anxiety and depression in patients after BC surgery, with OR (95%CI) of 0.777 (0.666 to 0.906), 0.928 (0.893 to 0.965), and 0.896 (0.860 to 0.934), respectively. The constructed nomogram model had good discrimination and calibration. The AUCs of the ROC curves for the model group, internal validation group, and external validation group were 0.885, 0.859, and 0.856, respectively. The maximum deviations for the model group, internal validation group, and external validation group were 0.029 (P=0.921), 0.042 (P=0.867), and 0.038 (P=0.894), respectively.
    Conclusion The nomogram model established based on Logistic regression analysis can better predict the risk of anxiety and depression in patients after BC surgery.

     

/

返回文章
返回