基于CiteSpace的中外重症监护室机械通气患者镇静策略研究热点比较分析

Research hotspots in intensive care unit sedation strategies for mechanically ventilated patients: a CiteSpace-based comparative analysis

  • 摘要: 目的 分析中外镇静策略在重症监护室(ICU)机械通气患者中的应用现状、研究热点及发展趋势。方法 基于中国知网、万方、Web of Science数据库, 检索2014—2024年镇静策略在机械通气患者中应用的相关文献。运用CiteSpace6.2.R3软件对发文量、关键词进行可视化分析。结果 共纳入中文文献475篇,英文文献405篇。国内外研究发文量呈现显著差异,国内早期活跃但后期下降,国外近5年增长强劲且持续性更突出。国外研究侧重于协议化镇静流程与标准化策略,国内聚焦于舒适镇静管理理念的优化及术后镇静策略研究。研究热点分析显示, ICU机械通气患者镇静策略中,药物精准化调控、疾病特异性镇静策略构建及多学科团队协作流程构建备受关注。结论 未来研究应着力于缩短临床指南更新周期、强化循证证据向临床实践转化、明确疾病特异性镇静策略应用标准、提升多中心协作研究能力,并开发基于人工智能的镇静监测技术。

     

    Abstract: Objective To analyze the current application status, research hotspots and development trends of sedation strategies from both domestic and international perspectives in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods Relevant literature on the application of sedation strategies in mechanically ventilated patients from 2014 to 2024 was retrieved from databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Web of Science. Visual analysis of publication volume and keywords was conducted using CiteSpace 6.2. R3 software. Results A total of 475 Chinese-language articles and 405 English-language articles were included. Significant differences were observed in publication volume between domestic and international research, with early domestic activity followed by a decline, while international research had demonstrated robust and sustained growth over the past five years. International studies primarily emphasized protocol-driven sedation processes and standardized strategies, whereas domestic research focused on optimizing the concept of comfort-oriented sedation management and exploring postoperative sedation strategies. Analysis of research hotspots revealed that precise pharmacological regulation, the development of disease-specific sedation strategies, and the establishment of multidisciplinary collaborative protocols were key areas of focus in sedation strategies for ICU mechanically ventilated patients. Conclusion Future research should prioritize shortening the update cycle of clinical guidelines, enhancing the translation of evidence-based practices into clinical settings, establishing clear application standards for disease-specific sedation strategies, improving multicenter collaborative research capabilities, and developing artificial intelligence-based sedation monitoring technologies.

     

/

返回文章
返回