体医融合双轨干预对大学生抑郁症患者负性认知的改善作用

Improvement effect of dual-track sport-medicine integration on negative cognition of college students with depression

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨体医融合模式下运动干预在大学生抑郁症患者中的应用价值。
    方法 选取抑郁症大学生126例为研究对象,采用简单随机化法分为常规组(n=63)与运动干预组(n=63)。常规组给予标准药物治疗与常规护理干预,运动干预组给予标准药物治疗与体医融合模式下运动干预。比较2组干预前后抑郁症严重程度抑郁自评量表(SDS)、抑郁症相关性疲乏问卷(FasD)、负性自动思维负性自动思维问卷(ATQ)、快感缺失程度多维快感缺失量表(DARS)、疾病感知压力中文版压力知觉量表(CPSS)及应对方式简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)变化。
    结果 干预后, 2组SDS评分和FasD评分低于干预前,且运动干预组低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预第2、8周, 2组ATQ评分低于干预前,且运动干预组低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后, 2组DARS评分低于干预前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后,运动干预组的爱好/业余活动、食物/饮料、感觉体验与社会活动评分低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后, 2组CPSS评分低于干预前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后,运动干预组的失控感维度、紧张感维度评分低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后, 2组SCSQ中自我调节维度、求助与问题解决维度评分高于干预前,幻想与逃避维度评分低于干预前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后,运动干预组自我调节维度和、求助与问题解决维度评分高于常规组,幻想与逃避维度评分低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
    结论 采用“临床医师风险评估-运动教练处方执行”双轨模式进行干预,可显著改善抑郁症大学生的负性自动思维、社会性快感缺失和逃避型应对。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore value of exercise intervention under the integrated model of sports and medicine in college students with depression.
    Methods A total of 126 college students with depression were selected as the research subjects, and divided into conventional group (n=63) and exercise intervention group (n=63) using the simple randomization method. The conventional group received standard pharmacological treatment and conventional nursing intervention, while the exercise intervention group received standard pharmacological treatment and exercise intervention under the integrated model of sports and medicine. The changes in depression severity Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Fatigue Associated with Depression Scale (FasD), negative automatic thoughts Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ), anhedonia Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS), perceived stress of the disease Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS) and coping styles Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ) were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention.
    Results After the intervention, the SDS scores and FasD scores in both groups were significantly lower than those before the intervention, and the scores in the exercise intervention group were significantly lower than those in the conventional group (P < 0.05). At weeks 2 and 8 of the intervention, the ATQ scores in both groups were significantly lower than those before the intervention, and the scores in the exercise intervention group were significantly lower than those in the conventional group (P < 0.05). After the intervention, the DARS scores in both groups were significantly lower than those before the intervention (P < 0.05). After the intervention, the scores for hobbies/amateur activities, food/beverages, sensory experiences and social activities in the exercise intervention group were significantly lower than those in the conventional group (P < 0.05). After the intervention, the CPSS scores in both groups were significantly lower than those before the intervention (P < 0.05). After the intervention, the scores for the loss-of-control dimension and the tension dimension in the CPSS in the exercise intervention group were significantly lower than those in the conventional group (P < 0.05). After the intervention, the scores for the self-regulation dimension, seeking-help and problem-solving dimension in the SCSQ in both groups were significantly higher than those before the intervention, while the scores for the fantasy and avoidance dimension were significantly lower than those before the intervention (P < 0.05). After the intervention, the scores for the self-regulation dimension, seeking-help and problem-solving dimension in the exercise intervention group were significantly higher than those in the conventional group, while the scores for the fantasy and avoidance dimension were significantly lower than those in the conventional group (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion Intervention using the dual-track model of "clinician risk assessment-exercise coach prescription implementation" can significantly improve negative automatic thoughts, social anhedonia, and avoidance coping in college students with depression.

     

/

返回文章
返回