脑损伤患者血肿扩张与立体定向穿刺术后再出血的相关性研究

Correlation between hematoma expansion in patients with brain injury and rebleeding after stereotactic puncture surgery

  • 摘要:
    目的 分析脑损伤出血早期血肿扩张与立体定向穿刺术后再出血的相关性及临床意义。
    方法 选取湖南中医药大学第一附属医院2021年1月—2025年1月收治的脑损伤出血患者245例为研究对象, 患者均接受立体定向穿刺术治疗。根据术后是否再出血将其分为再出血组及无再出血组; 比较2组临床资料、实验室指标、血肿扩张情况及头颅CT血肿影像征象; 采用二元Logistic回归分析筛选影响脑损伤立体定向穿刺术后再出血的危险因素; 基于多因素分析危险因素,进一步构建术后再出血风险预测列线图模型,评估该模型预测效能。
    结果 术后再出血组发病至手术时间、术前血肿体积、破入脑室、血肿扩张、血肿形态、CT黑洞征及CT混合征与无再出血组比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。二元Logistic回归分析显示,发病至手术时间(OR=3.213, 95%CI: 1.602~6.444)、术前血肿体积(OR=1.119, 95%CI: 1.060~1.181)、血肿扩张(OR=5.033, 95%CI: 2.548~9.942)、血肿形态不规则(OR=3.738, 95%CI: 1.799~7.765)、CT黑洞征(OR=2.447, 95%CI: 1.248~4.799)是脑损伤出血患者立体定向穿刺术后再出血的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。研究构建列线图模型预测术后再出血的AUC值为0.857(0.758~0.892), 具有较好的诊断一致性及临床效益, Hosmer-Lemeshow检验拟合度良好(P>0.05)。
    结论 基于早期血肿扩张及血肿形态不规则、CT黑洞征等影像学征象构建立体定向穿刺术后再出血风险预测列线图,有利于识别术后再出血高危脑损伤出血患者,提高临床评估的精准性,可为制订针对性治疗方案及改善患者预后提供一定指导。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To analyze the correlation and clinical significance between early hematoma expansion in cerebral injury hemorrhage and rebleeding after stereotactic puncture surgery.
    Methods A total of 245 patients with cerebral injury hemorrhage admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine from January 2021 to January 2025 were selected as the study subjects, all of whom underwent stereotactic puncture surgery. According to whether rebleeding occurred after surgery, the patients were divided into rebleeding group and non-rebleeding group. Clinical data, laboratory indicators, hematoma expansion status, and cranial CT hematoma imaging signs were compared between the two groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors influencingrebleeding after stereotactic puncture surgery for cerebral injury. Based on multivariate analysis of risk factors, a nomogram model for predicting the risk of postoperative rebleeding was further constructed, and its predictive performance was evaluated.
    Results Statistically significant differences were observed between the rebleeding group and the non-rebleeding group in terms of the time from onset to surgery, preoperative hematoma volume, rupture into the ventricle, hematomaexpansion, hematoma shape, CT black hole sign, and CT mixed sign (P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the time from onset to surgery (OR=3.213, 95%CI: 1.602 to 6.444), reoperative hematoma volume (OR=1.119, 95%CI: 1.060 to 1.181), hematoma expansion (OR=5.033, 95%CI: 2.548 to 9.942), irregular hematoma shape (OR=3.738, 95%CI: 1.799 to 7.765), and CT black hole sign (OR=2.447, 95%CI: 1.248 to 4.799) were independent risk factors for rebleeding after stereotactic puncture surgery in patients with cerebral injury hemorrhage (P < 0.05). The constructed nomogram model for predicting postoperative rebleeding demonstrated an AUC value of 0.857 (0.758 to 0.892), indicating good diagnostic consistency and clinical benefit, with a good fit according to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P>0.05).
    Conclusion Constructing a nomogram for predicting the risk of rebleeding after stereotactic puncture surgery based on early hematoma expansion, irregular hematoma shape, CT black hole sign, and other imaging signs is beneficial for identifying patients with cerebral injury hemorrhage at high risk of postoperative rebleeding, improving the accuracy of clinical assessment, and providing guidance for formulating targeted treatment plans and improving patient prognosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回