本体感觉神经肌肉促进疗法联合呼吸训练对脑卒中后偏瘫肩痛患者上肢运动功能的影响

Effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation therapy combined with respiratory training on upper limb motor function in patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain after stroke

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨本体感觉神经肌肉促进疗法(PNF)联合呼吸训练对脑卒中后偏瘫肩痛患者上肢功能恢复的临床疗效。
    方法 选取2023年5月至2024年12月在扬中市人民医院康复医学科进行治疗的脑卒中后偏瘫肩痛的患者共72例为研究对象, 按照随机数字表法分为PNF组(24例)、呼吸组(24例)和联合组(24例)。3组患者均接受常规康复治疗。在常规康复治疗基础上, PNF组辅以上肢PNF训练,呼吸组辅以呼吸训练,联合组采用PNF联合呼吸训练。3组均持续治疗6周。采用Fugl-Meyer上肢评价量表(FMA-UE)评估治疗前和治疗6周时上肢功能; 采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分评估疼痛程度; 采用用力肺活量(FVC)、吸气峰流速(PIF)、最大吸气压(MIP)评定患者肺功能和吸气肌功能。
    结果 治疗前,3组患者FMA-UE和VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与治疗前相比, 3组治疗6周时FMA-UE评分均升高, VAS评分均下降,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗6周时,联合组FMA-UE评分高于PNF组和呼吸组,且PNF组高于呼吸组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗6周时,联合组VAS评分低于PNF组和呼吸组,且呼吸组低于PNF组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与治疗前相比, 3组治疗6周时肺功能指标水平均改善,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗6周时,联合组肺功能指标水平高于PNF组和呼吸组,且呼吸组高于PNF组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论 在常规康复治疗基础上, PNF联合呼吸训练可有效改善脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能和缓解肩痛,提高患者生活质量。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) therapy combined with respiratory training on upper limb function recovery in patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain after stroke.
    Methods A total of 72 patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain after stroke who were treated in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of Yangzhong People's Hospital from May 2023 to December 2024 were selected. They were randomly divided into PNF group (24 cases), respiratory training group (24 cases), and combined group (24 cases) according to the random number table method. All three groups received routine rehabilitation treatment. On the basis of routine rehabilitation treatment, the PNF group was supplemented with upper limb PNF training, the respiratory training group was supplemented with respiratory training, and the combined group adopted PNF combined with respiratory training. All three groups were treated continuously for 6 weeks. The Fugl-Meyer Assessmentof Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) was used to evaluate upper limb function before treatment and at 6 weeks of treatment. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was used to assess the degree of pain. Forced vital capacity (FVC), peak inspiratory flow (PIF), and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) were used to evaluate patients' pulmonary function and inspiratory muscle function.
    Results Before treatment, there were no significant differences in FMA-UE and VAS scores among the three groups (P>0.05). Compared with before treatment, the FMA-UE scores of all three groups increased after treatment, and the VAS scores decreased, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). At 6 weeks of treatment, the FMA-UE score of the combined group was higher than that of the PNF group and the respiratory training group, and the PNF group was higher than the respiratory training group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). At 6 weeks of treatment, the VAS score of the combined group was lower than that of the PNF group and the respiratory training group, and the respiratory training group was lower than the PNF group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Compared with before treatment, the pulmonary function indicators of all three groups improved after treatment, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). At 6 weeks of treatment, the pulmonary function indicators of the combined group were higher than those of the PNF group and the respiratory training group, and the respiratory training group was higher than the PNF group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion On the basis of routine rehabilitation treatment, PNF combined with respiratory training can effectively improve upper limb motor function and relieve hemiplegic shoulder pain in patients with stroke, thereby improving their quality of life.

     

/

返回文章
返回