抗核抗体、抗双链DNA抗体及单核细胞趋化蛋白-1与系统性红斑狼疮肾损伤的关系

Association of antinuclear antibody, anti-double-stranded DNA antibody, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 with renal injury in systemic lupus erythematosus

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨抗核抗体(ANA)、抗双链DNA抗体(anti-dsDNA)及血清单核细胞趋化蛋白-1(MCP-1)水平与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者肾损伤的关系。
    方法 选取180例SLE患者进行病例对照研究,根据是否发生肾损伤分为肾损伤组60例和非肾损伤组120例。比较2组ANA、anti-dsDNA阳性率及血清MCP-1水平,并比较anti-dsDNA阳性表达与阴性表达的肾损伤患者的实验室指标水平。采用Pearson相关分析探讨血清MCP-1水平与肾功能指标的相关性; 绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,评估anti-dsDNA、MCP-1对SLE患者肾损伤的诊断效能。
    结果 肾损伤组ANA阳性率(95.00%)与非肾损伤组(91.67%)相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 肾损伤组anti-dsDNA阳性率(71.67%)高于非肾损伤组(50.83%), 血清MCP-1水平高于非肾损伤组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示, anti-dsDNA、MCP-1诊断SLE患者肾损伤的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.608(95%CI: 0.522~0.695)、0.668(95%CI: 0.574~0.762)。肾损伤组患者血红蛋白(Hb)、红细胞(RBC)、白蛋白(ALB)、免疫球蛋白A(IgA)、免疫球蛋白G(IgG)、补体C3水平均低于非肾损伤组患者,红细胞分布宽度(RDW)、β2-微球蛋白(β2-MG)、胱抑素C(Cys-C)、血清肌酐(SCr)、尿素氮(BUN)、尿酸(UA)水平均高于非肾损伤组患者,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。anti-dsDNA阳性患者的β2-MG、Cys-C、SCr、BUN、UA水平均高于anti-dsDNA阴性患者,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。Pearson相关分析结果显示, SLE肾损伤患者血清MCP-1水平与β2-MG、Cys-C、SCr、BUN、UA水平均呈显著正相关(r=0.711、0.684、0.593、0.402、0.441, P < 0.001)。
    结论 血清ANA与SLE患者肾损伤无显著关联,而anti-dsDNA阳性和MCP-1高表达则与肾损伤密切相关。MCP-1、anti-dsDNA对SLE肾损伤的诊断效能一般,建议将其与肾功能指标联合检测,以更精准地评估肾损伤程度。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the associations between serum levels of antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-double-stranded DNA antibody (anti-dsDNA), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and renal injury in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
    Methods A case-control study was conducted involving 180 patients with SLE, who were divided into renal injury group (n=60) and non-renal injury group (n=120) based on presence or absence of renal involvement. The positive rates of ANA and anti-dsDNA and serum MCP-1 levels were compared between the two groups. Additionally, laboratory parameters were compared between anti-dsDNA-positive and anti-dsDNA-negative patients within the renal injury group. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the relationships between serum MCP-1 levels and renal function markers. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of anti-dsDNA and MCP-1 for renal injury in SLE.
    Results There was no significant difference in the positive rate of ANA between the renal injury group (95.00%) and the non-renal injury group (91.67%) (P>0.05). The positive rate of anti-dsDNA in the renal injury group (71.67%) was higher than that in the non-renal injury group (50.83%), and the serum MCP-1 level in the renal injury group was higher than that in the non-renal injury group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the areas under the curves (AUCs) for anti-dsDNA and MCP-1 in diagnosing renal injury in SLE patients were 0.608 (95%CI, 0.522 to 0.695) and 0.668 (95%CI, 0.574 to0.762), respectively. The levels of hemoglobin (Hb), red blood cells (RBC), albumin (ALB), immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG) and complement C3 in patients in the renal injury group were all lower than those in patients in the non-renal injury group, the levels of red cell distribution width (RDW), β2-microglobulin (β2-MG), cystatin C (Cys-C), serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and uric acid (UA) were all higher than those in patients in the non-renal injury group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The levels of β2-MG, Cys-C, SCr, BUNand UA in anti-dsDNA-positive patients were all higher than those in anti-dsDNA-negative patients, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis results showed that serum MCP-1 levels in SLE patients with renal injury were significantly positively correlated with the levels of β2-MG, Cys-C, SCr, BUN and UA (r=0.711, 0.684, 0.593, 0.402, 0.441, P < 0.001).
    Conclusion Serum ANA has no significant association with renal injury in SLE patients, while positive anti-dsDNA and high expression of MCP-1 are closely related to renal injury. The diagnostic efficacy of MCP-1 and anti-dsDNA for SLE renal injury is general. It is recommended to combine their detection with renal function indicators for a more accurate assessment of the degree of renal injury.

     

/

返回文章
返回