宫颈锥切标本标识切缘及定向包埋切片对宫颈病变诊断的价值

Value of marking resection margins and oriented embedding of cervical conization specimens in diagnosing cervical lesions

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨宫颈锥切标本标识切缘及定向包埋切片对宫颈病变诊断的价值。
    方法 回顾性分析2023年8—9月中国医学科学院肿瘤医院的宫颈锥切标本, 实验组对10例宫颈锥切标本(总计164个标本块)进行基底切缘染色标记,并进行定向包埋和定向切片。随后,对164张苏木精-伊红(HE)染色切片进行综合评价,重点评估鳞状上皮与柱状上皮交界处完整呈现情况,并据此评价HE切片的完整性及病变遗漏风险。对照组基于便利抽样选取10例宫颈锥切标本(总计158个标本块)进行基底切缘染色标记,所有标本块均未进行定向包埋和定向切片,并采用与实验组相同的评价标准和方法对158张HE染色切片进行评价,评估HE染色切片的完整性及病变遗漏情况。
    结果 2组在相同条件下初诊,必要时进行连续切片以评估病变遗漏情况。对照组切片鳞状上皮缺失、鳞柱交界不完整率为50.0%; 实验组鳞状上皮缺失、鳞柱交界不完整率为14.6%。对照组切缘明确率为68.4%, 实验组为93.9%。实验组病变遗漏率和切片不完整率低于对照组, 切缘明确的切片占比高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论 宫颈锥切标本切缘染色标记联合定向包埋切片技术,能显著提升宫颈锥切切缘辨识度、清晰展示鳞柱交界处病变,有助于更准确、规范地评估病变情况。该标准化流程可提高病理诊断的准确性,降低误诊风险。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the value of marking the excision margin and oriented embedding sectioning of cervical conization specimens in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
    Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on cervical conization specimens from the cancer hospital, chinese academy of medical sciences from August to September 2023. In the experimental group, basal excision margins of 10 cervical conization specimens (a total of 164 specimen blocks) were stained and marked, followed by oriented embedding and sectioning. Subsequently, a comprehensive evaluation was performed on these 164 hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining sections, focusing on the complete presentation of the squamocolumnar junction, and based on which, the integrity of the HE sections and the risk of lesion omission were assessed. In the control group, 10 cervical conization specimens (a total of 158 specimen blocks) were selected via convenience sampling, and their basal excision margins were stained and marked. None of the specimen blocks underwent oriented embedding or sectioning. The same evaluation criteria and methods as those used for the experimental group were applied to assess the 158 HE staining sections, evaluating the integrity of the HE staining sections and the occurrence of lesion omission.
    Results Initial diagnosis was made for both groups under the same conditions, and serial sectioning was performed when necessary to assess lesion omission. In the control group, the rate of missing squamous epithelium and incomplete squamocolumnar junction was 50.0%; in the experimental group, it was 14.6%. The rate of clear excision margins was 68.4% in the control group and 93.9% in the experimental group. The experimental group had lower rates of lesion omission and incomplete sectioning and a higher proportion of sections with clear excision margins compared to the control group, with all differences being statistically significant (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion The technique of staining and marking the excision marginsof cervical conization specimens combined with oriented embedding sectioning can significantly enhance the identification of cervical conization margins, clearly display lesions at the squamocolumnar junction, and facilitate a more accurate and standardized assessment of lesions. This standardized procedure can improve the accuracy of pathological diagnosis and reduce the risk of misdiagnosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回