基于时机理论的夫妻协同护理对复发性流产患者疾病感知及婚姻调适能力的影响

The impact of couple collaborative nursing based on timing theory on disease perception and marital adjustment ability in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨基于时机理论的夫妻协同护理对复发性流产(RSA)患者疾病感知及婚姻调适能力的影响。
    方法 选取120例RSA患者作为研究对象, 采用随机数字表法分为实验组和对照组,每组60例。排除失访患者后,最终实验组纳入58例,对照组纳入56例。对照组实施常规护理,实验组在此基础上实施基于时机理论的夫妻协同护理,干预周期为3个月。比较2组患者干预前后的疾病感知修订版疾病感知问卷(IPQ-R)评分、婚姻调适能力婚姻调适量表(DAS)评分、焦虑情绪焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分及抑郁情绪抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分。
    结果 干预前, 2组IPQ-R评分、DAS评分、SAS评分及SDS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后,实验组IPQ-R中的疾病后果、疾病持续性、情绪影响维度评分及总分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05), 但2组疾病可控性维度评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后,实验组DAS中的婚姻满意度、夫妻沟通、角色适应维度评分及总分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05), 但2组冲突解决维度评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后,实验组SAS评分、SDS评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论 基于时机理论的夫妻协同护理可有效改善RSA患者的疾病感知,提升婚姻调适能力,并缓解负性情绪,建议在临床推广应用。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the impact of couple collaborative nursing based on the timing theory on disease perception and marital adjustment ability in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA).
    Methods A total of 120 patients with RSA were selected as the research subjects and divided into experimental group and control group using the random number table method, with 60 cases in each group. After excluding patients lost during follow-up, 58 cases were finally included in the experimental group and 56 cases in the control group. The control group received routine nursing, while the experimental group received couple-based collaborative nursing based on the timing theory in addition to routine nursing. The intervention period was 3 months. The disease perception scores on the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R), marital adjustment ability scores on the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), anxiety scores on the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and depression scores on the Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) of the two groups of patients before and after the intervention were compared.
    Results Before the intervention, there were no statistically significant differences in the IPQ-R, DAS, SAS, and SDS scores between the two groups (P>0.05). After the intervention, the scores of the disease consequence, disease duration, and emotional impact dimensions and the total IPQ-R score in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the scores of the disease controllability dimension between the two groups (P>0.05). After the intervention, the scores of the marital satisfaction, couple communication, and role adaptation dimensions and the total DAS score in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the scores of the conflict resolution dimension between the two groups (P>0.05). After the intervention, the SAS and SDS scores in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion Couple collaborative nursing based on the timing theory can effectively improve disease perception, enhance marital adjustment ability, and alleviate negative emotions in patients with RSA. It is recommended for clinical promotion and application.

     

/

返回文章
返回