自动套扎术联合聚多卡醇泡沫硬化剂治疗环状脱垂症状性内痔的效果

Efficacy of automatic ligation combined with polidocanol foam sclerosant in treating symptomatic circular prolapsed internal hemorrhoids

  • 摘要:
    目的 评价自动套扎术(RPH)联合聚多卡醇泡沫硬化剂治疗环状脱垂症状性内痔的临床效果。
    方法 回顾性选取2022年1月—2023年3月环状脱垂内痔患者82例为观察组,采用RPH联合聚多卡醇泡沫硬化剂治疗,以2020年1月—2022年12月经痔上直肠黏膜环切钉合术(PPH)手术治疗的82例患者为对照组,统计2组围术期并发症发生率、疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、日常生活活动能力Barthel评分以及1年期直肠狭窄率和复发率。
    结果 与对照组比较,观察组手术耗时更短,肛门感觉异常发生率更低,术后7 d内VAS评分下降更快,疼痛缓解更显著,但尿潴留发生率较高,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在手术失血、术后肛门肿胀、迟发出血、Barthel评分、狭窄率和复发率等方面, 2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
    结论 RPH联合聚多卡醇泡沫硬化剂治疗环状脱垂症状性内痔在疗效与安全性上优于PPH治疗,且操作学习曲线较短,适用于Ⅲ~Ⅳ °环状脱垂内痔的临床处理。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of automatic ligation (RPH) combined with polidocanol foam sclerosant in treating symptomatic circular prolapsed internal hemorrhoids.
    Methods A retrospective selection was made in 82 patients with circumferential prolapsed internal hemorrhoids from January 2022 to March 2023 (observation group) who were treated with RPH combined with polidocanol foam sclerotherapy. Another 82 patients who underwent procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) surgery from January 2020 to December 2022 were chosen as control group. The differences in the incidence of perioperative complications, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, Barthel scores for activities of daily living, as well as the 1-year rates of rectal stenosis and recurrence were statistically compared between the two groups.
    Results Compared with the control group, the observation group had a shorter surgical duration, a lower incidence of abnormal anal sensation, a faster decline in VAS score within 7 days postoperatively, and more significant pain relief, but a higher incidence of urinary retention, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of surgical blood loss, postoperative anal swelling, delayed bleeding, Barthel score, stenosis rate, and recurrence rate (P>0.05).
    Conclusion RPH combined with polidocanol foam sclerosant is superior to PPH in terms of effectiveness and safety in treating symptomatic circular prolapsed internal hemorrhoids, and has a shorter learning curve for operation. It can be applied to the clinical management of grade Ⅲ to Ⅳ circular prolapsed internal hemorrhoids.

     

/

返回文章
返回