腋下小切口与传统后外侧切口肺癌根治术的临床比较

Clinical comparison of transaxillary minithoracotomy and traditional posterolateral thoracotomy for radical resection of lung cancer

  • 摘要: 目的:比较腋下小切口与传统后外侧切口肺癌根治术的临床效果。方法将123例原发性肺癌患者随机分为观察组和对照组,观察组行腋下小切口肺癌根治术,对照组行传统后外侧切口肺癌根治术。观察并记录2组患者手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量及术后指标(离床时间、住院时间、疼痛强度评分、预后、并发症)。结果2组患者手术切口长度、术中出血量、术后离床时间、术后住院时间、术后疼痛强度评分相比有显著性差异(P <0.05);观察组患者术后并发症发生率(7.69%)明显低于对照组(15.51%)(P <0.05)。2组患者术后6月预后差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论腋下小切口肺癌根治术疗效肯定,损伤小,疼痛轻,恢复快,并发症少,值得临床推广。

     

    Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical effect between transaxillary minithoracotomy and posterolateral thoracotomy for radical resection of lung cancer.Methods 123 patients with lung cancer were divided into observation group and control group.The observation group was given transaxillary minithoracotomy,and control group was given traditional posterolateral thoracotomy. The length of incision,operation time,volume of blood lose during operation,postoperative index (bed stay,hospital stay,pain intensity score,prognosis and complications)of two groups were recorded.Results There were significant differences in length of incision,volume of blood lose during operation,postoperative bed stay,postoperative hospital stay,score of postoperative pain de-gree between two groups(P <0.05).The complications rate of observation group (7.69%)was lower than that of control group (15.51%),the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). There were no significant differences in prognosis of the two groups in 6 months after surgery (P >0.05).Conclusion Transaxillary minithoracotomy for radical resection of lung cancer has good clinical effect,minor injury and pain,fast recovery and less complications,so it was worthy of being application.

     

/

返回文章
返回