Re-bleeding risk evaluation and efficacy of clinical grading nursing intervention in patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
-
摘要: 目的 运用Rockall危险性积分评估急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血(ANVUGIB)患者再出血危险程度,并评估临床分级护理干预效果.方法 将2014年1-12月入院的56例患者设为对照组,将2015年1-12月入院的51例患者设为实验组.在消化道出血治疗基础上,对照组给予常规护理,实验组实施基于Rockall危险性积分的临床分级护理干预.观察2组住院期间再出血发生情况,对比2组焦虑、抑郁情绪改善情况,以及患者疾病认知和遵医嘱行为.结果 实验组再出血总发生率7.8％,显著低于对照组的25.0％(P＜0.05);干预后,2组SDS和SAS评分均显著下降(P＜0.05或P＜0.01),且实验组显著低于对照组(P＜0.01);实验组疾病知识和认知行为掌握人数比例显著高于对照组(P＜0.05或P＜0.01),遵医嘱行为依从率显著高于对照组(P＜0.05).结论 基于Rockall危险性评分的临床分级护理干预能有效降低ANVUGIB患者再出血风险,缓解焦虑、抑郁情绪,提高患者疾病认知和遵医嘱行为.
-
关键词:
- 非静脉曲张性上消化道出血 /
- 再出血 /
- Rockall危险性积分 /
- 分级护理
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the re-bleeding risk severity and the clinical efficacy of clinical grading nursing intervention in patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) using Rockall risk scoring.Methods A total of 56 patients from January to December 2014 were selected as control group while another 51 cases from January to December 2015 were as experimental group.Control group was added with routine nursing while experimental group with clinical grading nursing intervention based on Rockall risk scoring on the basis of treatment for gastrointestinal bleeding.The occurrence rate of re-bleeding during hospitalization was observed inboth groups,the improvement of anxiety and depression as well as patients'cognition on disease and behaviors following doctors'advice were compared between two groups.Results The total occurrence rate of re-bleeding was 7.8％ in experimental group,evidently lower than the 25.0％ in control group (P ＜0.05).After intervention,self-rating depression scale (SDS) and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) decreased in both groups (P ＜0.05 or P ＜0.01),which decreased more significantly in experimental group than that in control group (P ＜0.01).Experimental group was markedly higher in the number of patients who grasped the knowledge and cognitive behaviors on disease (P ＜ 0.05 or P ＜ 0.01) as well as the compliance of behaviors following doctors'advice than control group (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Clinical grading nursing intervention based on Rockall risk scoring can effectively reduce the re-bleeding risk of patients with ANVUGIB,relieve their anxiety and depression,and improve their cognition on disease and behaviors following doctors'advice. -
-
期刊类型引用(19)
1. 陈少清，谢锦銮. 危险性积分加量化评估对上消化道出血并高血压的分析. 心血管病防治知识. 2023(05): 52-54+57 . 
百度学术
2. 景艳艳，贾海妮. 分级护理干预在上消化道出血患者中的应用效果. 临床医学研究与实践. 2022(10): 151-153 . 百度学术
3. 李江虹，黄国进，虞艳，成翠娥，曾远程. RDW、Hb、GAS与ANVUGIB患者GBS、AIMS65评分的关系及预测再出血的价值. 中国医师杂志. 2022(08): 1257-1260 . 百度学术
4. 杨莹莹. CAT量表评分指导下的分级护理在老年COPD患者中的应用效果. 现代养生. 2022(23): 2066-2069 . 百度学术
5. 丁娟，马志杰，沙嫚. 上消化道出血病人消化内镜治疗后再出血风险预测模型的构建. 全科护理. 2021(33): 4746-4749 . 百度学术
6. 刘荣钰. Rockall危险性积分导向下的分级护理在ANVUGIB患者中的应用. 国际医药卫生导报. 2020(02): 279-281 . 百度学术
7. 崔锡兰. 分级护理在ANVUGIB患者中的干预效果. 中国卫生标准管理. 2020(06): 157-158 . 百度学术
8. 陈金辉. 延续护理对急性非静脉曲张上消化道出血患者再出血率及医护遵从性的影响. 当代护士(上旬刊). 2020(05): 45-48 . 百度学术
9. 陈晓美. 探讨上消化道出血患者的护理对策, 并观察护理的临床效果. 实用临床护理学电子杂志. 2020(11): 122 . 百度学术
10. 张秀兰. 分级护理干预护理后上消化道出血患者再出血率分析. 甘肃科技. 2020(14): 127-129 . 百度学术
11. 尧霞秀. 临床分级护理在急性上消化道出血患者护理中的应用. 基层医学论坛. 2019(06): 767+813 . 百度学术
12. 徐泽静. 分级护理对消化道出血患者血液指标及再出血率的影响. 口岸卫生控制. 2019(02): 43-44+49 . 百度学术
13. 郭艳，夏洪芬，张世萍，罗金容. 基于Rockall评分系统的护理干预对急性上消化道出血患者内镜介入治疗预后的影响. 广西医科大学学报. 2019(06): 1034-1037 . 百度学术
14. 徐明. 临床分级护理干预在消化道出血患者中的应用效果. 中国现代药物应用. 2019(14): 193-195 . 百度学术
15. 马秀云，申月芹. 临床分级护理对急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的干预效果. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志. 2019(27): 103+113 . 百度学术
16. 周贺. 优质护理对老年肺结核患者用药依从性的影响分析. 中国医药指南. 2019(33): 238 . 百度学术
17. 冯丽均. 临床分级护理干预在消化道出血患者中的应用研究. 实用临床护理学电子杂志. 2018(15): 6-7 . 百度学术
18. 商娜. 临床分级护理干预在消化道出血患者中的应用效果评价. 中国医药指南. 2018(31): 199-200 . 百度学术
19. 周艳丽. 优质护理干预用于上消化道出血患者中的效果研究. 实用临床护理学电子杂志. 2017(39): 36+46 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 355
- HTML全文浏览量: 114
- PDF下载量: 9
- 被引次数: 22
下载:
苏公网安备 32100302010246号
