内侧或外侧经皮微创钢板内固定在A型闭合性胫骨远端骨折中的应用价值

Application value of internal and lateral percutaneous minimally invasive plate internal fixation for type A closed distal tibial fracture

  • 摘要:
      目的  探讨采用内侧或外侧经皮微创钢板内固定术(MIPPO)治疗A型闭合性胫骨远端骨折的手术效果。
      方法  选取本院骨伤科确诊的88例A型闭合性胫骨远端骨折患者,均接受MIPPO术联合锁定加压钢板(LCP)内固定治疗。采用简单随机分组法将88例患者分为内侧固定组(n=44)和外侧固定组(n=44), 比较2组手术时间、手术出血量、术后1 d视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、骨折愈合时间、并发症和踝-后足功能评分(AOFAS)等指标。
      结果  内侧固定组手术时间、手术出血量、骨折愈合时间优于外侧固定组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05); 2组术后1 d VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组术后均成功随访≥6个月,其中内侧固定组平均随访8.35个月,外侧固定组平均随访8.29个月。2组切口感染、钢板弯曲、延迟愈合、踝关节疼痛及总并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05), 2组末次随访踝-后足功能AOFAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
      结论  A型闭合性胫骨远端骨折行内侧或外侧MIPPO的短期疗效接近,但内侧固定在缩短手术时间、减少手术出血量和促进骨折愈合方面具有优势。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To investigate the effect of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) in the treatment of type A closed distal tibial fractures.
      Methods  A total of 88 patients with type A closed distal tibial fracture diagnosed and treated in orthopedics and traumatology department in our hospital were treated with MIPPO surgery combined with internal fixation of Locking Compression Plate (LCP), and were divided into internal fixation group (n=44) and lateral fixation group (n=44) by simple random grouping method. The operative time, bleeding volume, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, fracture healing time, complications and ankle-hind foot function score of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) of the two groups were compared.
      Results  The operation time, bleeding volume and fracture healing time of internal fixation group were significantly better than those of lateral fixation group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups at 1 day after operation (P>0.05). Both groups were followed up successfully for more than 6 months. The average follow-up time was 8.35 months in internal fixation group, and 8.29 months in lateral fixation group. There were no significant differences in incision infection, plate bending, delayed healing, ankle pain and total complication rate between medial fixation group and lateral fixation group(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in AOFAS scores at last follow-up between two groups(P>0.05).
      Conclusion  The short-term efficacy of MIPPO for type A closed distal tibial fracture is similar, but internal fixation has advantages in shortening operation time, reducing operative bleeding and promoting fracture healing.

     

/

返回文章
返回