不同类型免洗消毒液使用效果及启封稳定性研究

Effect of different types of wash-free disinfectants and their stabilities after opening

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨不同类型免洗消毒液的使用效果及启封后乙醇含量稳定性,为即将正式实施的WS/T 313-2019《医务人员手卫生规范》做好准备。 方法 选取泡沫型、凝胶型和喷雾型免洗消毒液,分别使用0.5~5.0 mL进行手消毒现场试验,评估达到≥1.00平均杀灭对数值时的最优用量。比较不同类型免洗消毒液启封后初始乙醇含量和启封后2、4、6、8、10周时乙醇含量。 结果 泡沫型免洗消毒液、凝胶型免洗消毒液和喷雾型免洗消毒液达到≥1.00平均杀灭对数值时的最优用量分别为0.7、3.0、4.0 mL。泡沫型免洗消毒液启封后乙醇含量更加稳定,有效期可长达10周,而凝胶型免洗消毒液和喷雾型免洗消毒液启封后的有效期分别为6、5周。 结论 泡沫型免洗消毒液在使用0.7 mL时即可达到免洗消毒的效果,其包装瓶的异型泵头结构在启封后可保持2个月以上的有效成分稳定性。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of different types of wash-free disinfectants and stability of ethanol content after opening so as to prepare for official implementation of Specification of Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers(WS/T 313-2019)in the near future. Methods Foam, gel and spray disinfectants were selected, and 0.5 to 5.0 mL of each disinfectant was used for hand disinfection field tests to evaluate the optimal amount for ≥1.00 mean kill log value. The initial ethanol content after opening and ethanol content at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 weeks after opening were compared among the three disinfectants. Results The optimal amounts of foam, gel and spray disinfectants were 0.7, 3.0 and 4.0 mL when the average kill log value was ≥1.00. The ethanol content of the foam disinfectant was more stable and the validity period was up to 10 weeks, while the validity periods of the gel disinfectant and spray disinfectant were 6 and 5 weeks respectively after opening. Conclusion The foam wash-free disinfectant achieves wash-free disinfection at 0.7 mL, and the shaped pump head structure of the bottle maintains active ingredient stability for more than 2 months after opening.

     

/

返回文章
返回