Analysis on prognosis of endovascular treatment in moderate and severe patients with acute basilar artery occlusion
-
摘要: 目的 探讨急性中重症基底动脉闭塞(BAO)患者血管内治疗的安全性及有效性。 方法 回顾性分析行血管内治疗的28例急性BAO昏迷患者的临床资料,按术前症状分为中等症状组(昏迷不合并四肢瘫)17例及重症组(昏迷合并四肢瘫)11例,统计患者一般情况、术前状态、治疗方式、血管成功再通率、术后脑实质出血发生率及术后3个月改良Rankin量表(mRS)分级。 结果 28例患者中20例(71.4%)为单纯栓塞性闭塞,行支架取栓治疗, 8例(28.6%)为粥样硬化性狭窄继发闭塞, 2例导管通过后血管再通, 6例支架取栓后行球囊扩张成形及补救支架植入; 28例患者中,成功开通血管26例(92.9%), 中等症状组及重症组各有1例开通失败(2例患者均死亡); 中等症状组及重症组各有1例发生术后脑实质出血(2例患者均死亡); 术后3个月中等症状组预后良好(mRS分级0~2级)6例(35.3%), 重症组无1例预后良好; 中等症状组3例(17.6%)死亡,重症组6例(54.5%)死亡。 结论 昏迷不合并四肢瘫的急性BAO患者行血管内治疗安全有效,昏迷合并四肢瘫BAO患者行血管内治疗不能改善术后3个月的预后。Abstract: Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of endovascular therapy for moderate and severe patients with acute basilar artery occlusion(BAO). Methods The data of 28 coma patients with acute BAO treated by endovascular therapy was retrospectively analyzed. According to preoperative symptoms, 17 coma cases without tetraplegia were selected as moderate group and 11 coma cases with tetraplegia were selected as severe group. The baseline data, preoperative status, treatment methods, successful recanalization rate, occurrence of hemorrhage of brain parenchyma, and modified Rankin scale(mRS)grading after 3 month were recorded. Results Out of the 28 patients, 20(71.4%)presented as simple embolistic occlusion, and were treated by stent embolism removal, 8(28.6%)as intracranial atherosclerosis-related occlusions, among whom 2(7.1%)were recanalized after the passing of catheter, and the other 6(21.4%)were treated with balloon dilatation or stent implantation after stent thrombectomy. Twenty-six patients(92.9%)obtained successful revascularization, there was one case failed to get revascularization in moderate group and severe group, and both patients were dead. At the same time, there was one patient with parenchymal hemorrhage after operation in each group, and the two patients were dead. At 3-month followed-up, 6 patients(35.3%)presented as good prognosis in the moderate group(mRS classification ranging from 0 to 2 grading), and none with good prognosis occurred in the severe group.There were 3 deaths(17.6%)in moderate group and 6(54.5%)in severe group. Conclusion Endovascular therapy is safe and effective for coma patients without tetraplegia caused by acute BAO. But it can't improve the 3-month prognosis for coma patients with tetraplegia.
-
Keywords:
- basilar artery occlusion /
- coma /
- endovascular therapy /
- prognosis
-
-
Sheng K, Tong M. Therapy for acute basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. F1000Res, 2019, 8: 165-165.
Schonewille W J, Algra A, Serena J, et al. Outcome in patients with basilar artery occlusion treated conventionally[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2005, 76(9): 1238-1241.
Schonewille W J, Wijman C A, Michel P, et al. Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study(BASICS): a prospective registry study[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2009, 8(8): 724-730.
Sairanen T, Strbian D, Soinne L, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis of basilar artery occlusion: predictors of recanalization and outcome[J]. Stroke, 2011, 42(8): 2175-2179.
Liu X F, Dai Q L, Ye R D, et al. Endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion(BEST): an open-label, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2020, 19(2): 115-122.
Dorňák T, Herzig R, Kuliha M, et al. Endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion: time to treatment is crucial[J]. Clin Radiol, 2015, 70(5): e20-e27.
Gory B, Mazighi M, Labreuche J, et al. Predictors for mortality after mechanical thrombectomy of acute basilar artery occlusion[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2018, 45(1/2): 61-67.
Berkhemer O A, Fransen P S, Beumer D, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(1): 11-20.
Campbell B C, Mitchell P J, Kleinig T J, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(11): 1009-1018.
Goyal M, Demchuk A M, Menon B K, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(11): 1019-1030.
Jovin T G, Chamorro A, Cobo E, et al. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(24): 2296-2306.
Saver J L, Goyal M, Bonafe A, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(24): 2285-2295.
Nogueira R G, Frei D, Kirmani J F, et al. Safety and efficacy of a 3-dimensional stent retriever with aspiration-based thrombectomy vs aspiration-based thrombectomy alone in acute ischemic stroke intervention: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Neurol, 2018, 75(3): 304-311.
Zaidat O O, Bozorgchami H, Ribó M, et al. Primary results of the multicenter ARISE Ⅱ study(analysis of revascularization in ischemic stroke with EmboTrap)[J]. Stroke, 2018, 49(5): 1107-1115.
Kang D H, Jung C, Yoon W, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion: a multicenter retrospective observational study[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2018, 7(14): e009419.
Wang L, Shi W C, Su Z G, et al. Endovascular treatment of severe acute basilar artery occlusion[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2015, 22(1): 195-198.
曾德华. 椎基底动脉狭窄对患者后循环脑梗死及预后的影响研究[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2017, 21(11): 28-30 , 41.
Bouslama M, Haussen D C, Aghaebrahim A, et al. Predictors of good outcome after endovascular therapy for vertebrobasilar occlusion stroke[J]. Stroke, 2017, 48(12): 3252-3257.
李文波, 魏立平, 张耀慧, 等. 急性院内基底动脉闭塞所致呼吸心跳骤停血管内治疗1例[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2018, 13(7): 743-747. Long J W, Qin H, Zhang H Q. Evaluation of recanalisation treatment on posterior circulation ischemic stroke by Solitaire device-A multicenter retrospective study[J]. Neurol Neurochir Pol, 2017, 51(3): 208-213.
-
期刊类型引用(12)
1. 徐晓琳，徐紫娟，刘倩，刘菊花，余淑勤. 宫颈提拉式缝合术联合卡前列甲酯栓治疗瘢痕子宫剖宫产术中子宫下段出血的临床效果. 中国医学创新. 2025(07): 81-84 . 
百度学术
2. 韦卉，潘珏蓉. 子宫下段提拉式缝合对子宫下段菲薄剖宫产产妇产后出血与瘢痕憩室的影响. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志. 2025(06): 59-61 . 百度学术
3. 曾凤蓉. 宫颈提拉缝合术在修复子宫疤痕憩室的应用疗效及对患者预后的影响. 黑龙江医学. 2024(08): 941-944 . 百度学术
4. 周严娟，李丽，凌利，张玮. 宫颈提拉缝合术治疗前置胎盘剖宫产术中出血的临床效果观察. 中国医师进修杂志. 2024(08): 713-717 . 百度学术
5. 段丽娜. 宫颈提拉缝合术联合子宫下段环形缝扎术预防凶险性前置胎盘患者产后出血的临床效果. 妇儿健康导刊. 2024(15): 67-70 . 百度学术
6. 王秋菊，郑丽雅，申岩，王园园. 以子宫颈为中心放射状改良大八字缝合在穿透性胎盘植入术中止血的效果分析. 婚育与健康. 2023(03): 28-30 . 百度学术
7. 刘巧香，王华莉，高立娟，王义娜. 宫颈提拉式缝合术在特殊剖宫产术中的应用效果. 中国实用医刊. 2022(12): 56-58 . 百度学术
8. 折开娥，张凌燕，李虹，秦利，吴桂清. 腹动脉球囊置入联合宫颈提拉缝合治疗凶险性前置胎盘产后大出血临床效果. 现代生物医学进展. 2022(20): 3917-3921 . 百度学术
9. 董湘梅，曾琴燕，苏明兰. 子宫下段多方位螺旋式缝合成形术在前置胎盘患者中的应用效果. 中国当代医药. 2022(32): 127-129 . 百度学术
10. 何华平，邓晓玲，方敏. 卡前列素氨丁三醇联合球囊压迫治疗凶险性前置胎盘的临床疗效观察. 外科研究与新技术. 2021(02): 125-127 . 百度学术
11. 孙宇，杨奕梅，范薇，康玮，杨丽娟，李菱，张雯. 子宫下段螺旋式同心圆缝合术在前置胎盘(并植入)手术中的应用效果. 贵州医科大学学报. 2021(12): 1452-1457 . 百度学术
12. 毕玉芬. 宫颈提拉式缝合联合防波堤样缝合在前置胎盘止血中的应用. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志. 2021(02): 146-148 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(0)
计量
- 文章访问数: 329
- HTML全文浏览量: 93
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 12
下载:
苏公网安备 32100302010246号
