床旁超声引导与传统触摸法在ICU老年危重患者足背动脉穿刺置管中的效果比较

Effect of bedside ultrasound guidance versus traditional touch method in the catheterization of dorsalis pedis artery in elderly critical ill patients in ICU

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨床旁超声引导与传统触摸法在ICU老年危重患者足背动脉穿刺置管中的效果。 方法 选取本院ICU接受救治的72例老年危重患者为研究对象,年龄均≥65岁,均选择足背动脉穿刺置管,并进行动脉压力监测。采用计算机随机分组软件将72例患者分为对照组和实验组,每组36例。对照组采用传统触摸法穿刺置管,实验组在ICU床旁超声仪引导全程可视下穿刺并留置套管针。比较2组一次穿刺置管成功率、穿刺置管成功率、穿刺置管时间、动脉压监测准确率和穿刺部位并发症发生情况。 结果 实验组一次穿刺置管成功率为86.11%, 穿刺置管成功率为100.00%, 动脉压监测准确率为100.00%, 分别高于对照组的63.89%、80.56%、83.33%, 穿刺置管平均时间为(1.09±0.33)min, 短于对照组的(1.31±0.38)min, 差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05); 实验组并发症发生率为5.56%, 低于对照组的25.00%, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 床旁超声引导下足背动脉穿刺置管能显著提高ICU老年危重患者穿刺置管成功率和动态监测数据的准确性,同时减少血肿和瘀斑等并发症的发生。

     

    Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of bedside ultrasound guidance versus traditional touch method in the catheterization of dorsalis pedis artery in elderly critical ill patients in ICU. Methods A total of 72 elderly critically ill patients aged 65 years and above in ICU in our hospital were selected, and were carried out catheterization of dorsalis pedis artery and performed arterial pressure monitoring. They were divided into control group and experimental group by computer randomization software, with 36 cases in each group. The control group received traditional touch method for puncture and catheterization. In the experimental group, the catheter was placed under the guidance of ultrasound in the whole course at the bedside of ICU. The success rate of one-time catheterization, success rates of catheterization and puncture, catheterization time, accuracy rate of arterial pressure monitoring and incidence of complications of puncture sites were compared between the two groups. Results In the experimental group, the success rate of one-time catheterization was 86.11%, the success rate of catheterization was 100.00%, and the accuracy rate of arterial pressure monitoring was 100.00%, which were significantly higher than 63.89%, 80.56% and 83.33%, respectively in the control group(P<0.05); the average time of catheterization was(1.09±0.33)min, which was significantly shorter than(1.31±0.38)min in the control group(P<0.05); the incidence of complications in the experimental group was 5.56%, which was significantly lower than 25.00% in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Bedside ultrasound-guided catheterization of dorsalis pedis artery can effectively improve the success rate of catheterization and the accuracy rate of data dynamic monitoring, and reduce the incidence of complications such as hematoma and ecchymosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回