硬膜外麻醉复合全身麻醉对结直肠癌腹腔镜根治术患者血流动力学、组织氧合及麻醉药物剂量的影响

金曼, 云军

金曼, 云军. 硬膜外麻醉复合全身麻醉对结直肠癌腹腔镜根治术患者血流动力学、组织氧合及麻醉药物剂量的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(11): 92-96. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202011025
引用本文: 金曼, 云军. 硬膜外麻醉复合全身麻醉对结直肠癌腹腔镜根治术患者血流动力学、组织氧合及麻醉药物剂量的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(11): 92-96. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202011025
JIN Man , YUN Jun. Effects of epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia on hemodynamics,tissue oxygenation and anesthetic dose in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical surgery for colorectal cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(11): 92-96. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202011025
Citation: JIN Man , YUN Jun. Effects of epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia on hemodynamics,tissue oxygenation and anesthetic dose in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical surgery for colorectal cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(11): 92-96. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202011025

硬膜外麻醉复合全身麻醉对结直肠癌腹腔镜根治术患者血流动力学、组织氧合及麻醉药物剂量的影响

基金项目: 

陕西省科技厅基金项目(2015GYZ20160512)

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: R735.3

Effects of epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia on hemodynamics,tissue oxygenation and anesthetic dose in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical surgery for colorectal cancer

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨硬膜外麻醉复合全身麻醉对结直肠癌腹腔镜根治术患者血流动力学、组织氧合及麻醉药物剂量的影响。 方法 选择行结直肠癌腹腔镜根治术治疗的88例患者,根据非随机临床同期对照研究及患者充分知情自愿原则分为观察组(硬膜外复合全身麻醉)和对照组(单纯全身麻醉),每组44例。观察和统计围术期各时点[入室后(T0)、气管插管后10 min(T1)、建立气腹后1 h(T2)、建立气腹后2 h(T3)、关闭气腹后10 min(T4)、拔管时(T5)]平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)的变化,并于T0、T2、T3、T5时点进行动脉血气分析,记录脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)和动脉血氧分压[p(O2)],并计算肺内血分流率(QS/QT)。比较2组患者麻醉药物剂量、术后恢复情况及不良反应发生率。 结果 观察组T2、T3、T5时点MAP显著低于对照组,T2、T3时点HR显著低于对照组(P<0.05); 观察组T2、T3、T5时点QS/QT显著低于对照组, SpO2p(O2)显著高于对照组(P<0.05); 观察组丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼、顺阿曲库铵麻醉药物剂量均显著少于对照组,苏醒时间、拔管时间均显著早于对照组(P<0.05); 2组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 在结直肠癌腹腔镜根治术中采用硬膜外麻醉复合全身麻醉可有效维持术中血流动力学稳定,改善组织氧合功能,减少麻醉药物剂量,促进患者恢复。
    Abstract: Objective To observe effects of epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia on hemodynamics, tissue oxygenation and anesthetic dose in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Methods Eighty-eight patients who underwent laparoscopic radical surgery for colorectal cancer were enrolled. According to non-randomized clinical controled study and well-informed voluntary principle, they were divided into observation group(epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia)and control group(general anesthesia), with 44 cases in each group. Changes of mean arterial pressure(MAP)and heart rate(HR)after entering to the room(T0), at 10 min after tracheal intubation(T1), at 1 h after establishing pneumoperitoneum(T2), at 2 h after establishing pneumoperitoneum(T3), at 10 min after closing pneumoperitoneum(T4), at extubation time(T5)during perioperation were observed. At T0, T2, T3 and T5, arterial blood gas analysis was conducted. The pulse oximetric saturation(SpO2)and arterial oxygen pressure[p(O2)] were recorded, and intrapulmonary shunt ratio(QS/QT)was calculated. The anesthetic dose, postoperative recovery and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. - Results At T2, T3 and T5, the values of MAP in observation group were significantly lower, and HR at T2 and T3 was significantly lower than that in control group(P<0.05). At T2, T3 and T5, QS/QT in observation group was significantly lower, while SpO2 and p(O2)were significantly higher than those in control group(P<0.05). The doses of anaesthetic drugs such as propofol, remifentanil and cisatracurium in observation group were significantly less, and recovery time as well as extubation time were significantly earlier than those in control group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion The application of epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia in laparoscopic radical surgery for colorectal cancer can effectively maintain stability of intraoperative hemodynamics, improve tissue oxygenation function, reduce anesthetic dose, and promote patients'recovery.
  • 汪建平. 结直肠癌研究2017年热点回顾和未来展望[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(1): 1-6.
    范学明, 章放香, 黄玲, 等. TEAS联合全身麻醉与硬膜外阻滞联合全身麻醉对腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术患者术后恢复影响的比较[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2018, 38(9): 1053-1057.
    皮名芳, 林雷, 陈春. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术不同麻醉方法的对比研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2015, 44(11): 1541-1543.
    陶振洲, 李洋, 曹广, 等. 70岁以上老年患者腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术安全性分析[J]. 中国综合临床, 2019, 35(1): 1-4.
    李铁军, 蔡淑女, 印春铭. 全身麻醉复合硬膜外阻滞麻醉在老年结直肠癌患者腹腔镜手术中的应用评价[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2015, 22(2): 191-193.
    金立耸. 直肠癌腹腔镜手术中不同麻醉方法对手术效果的影响分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2019, 24(5): 348-351.
    谢波, 钱军, 喻大军, 等. 腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌手术对围术期患者应激和免疫功能的影响[J]. 广东医学, 2016, 37(20): 3068-3070.
    马龙, 侯俊德, 王志刚, 等. 硬膜外麻醉联合全身麻醉复合右美托咪定对腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术患者免疫功能及应激反应的影响[J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2018, 35(8): 1076-1079.
    高怀新. 硬膜外复合全身麻醉对结肠癌腔镜围术期患者的免疫抑制作用观察[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2016, 22(2): 130-133.
    伦明辉, 孙晓峰, 赵宏. 不同麻醉方法对下腹部腹腔镜手术应激影响的对照研究[J]. 河北医药, 2015, 37(24): 3688-3691.
    叶克平, 叶琦刚, 王文伟, 等. 不同麻醉方法对结直肠癌根治术患者术后早期细胞免疫功能的影响[J]. 浙江医学, 2019, 41(11): 1179-1182.
    曹德钧, 罗礼君. 全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉在腹腔镜直肠癌手术的应用[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2015, 21(6): 436-439.
    杨洪胜, 肖代顺, 吕启生, 等. 两种麻醉方法在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中的对比分析[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2014, 20(2): 128-130.
    龙波, 张立民, 柴军, 等. 老年超重患者腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中呼气末正压通气和/或间歇性膨肺在改善氧合功能中的作用[J]. 大连医科大学学报, 2016, 38(3): 245-249.
    单文燕, 黄晓玲, 容雄飞. 不同二氧化碳气腹压力对老年腹腔镜直肠癌手术患者脑氧供需平衡及能量代谢的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2015, 32(8): 1619-1621.
    杨春, 汪小海. 二氧化碳气腹相关的肝肾损伤的研究进展[J]. 医学综述, 2019, 25(10): 1990-1994.
    刘永峰, 刘云胜. 保护性肺通气策略对老年开腹手术患者肺顺应性和氧合功能的影响[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2016, 22(3): 264-266.
    马国才, 史静, 王远胜, 等. 硬膜外联合全身麻醉对老年腹部手术患者内脏氧合的影响分析[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志: 电子版, 2014, 6(7): 138-141.
    赵冬石, 白净, 刘铁军, 等. 两种麻醉方式对老年腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术患者肺内分流及氧合功能的影响[J]. 重庆医学, 2019, 48(13): 2230-2233.
    李锋, 朱蔚琳, 黄中华, 等. 气腹对老年结直肠癌患者肺顺应性和肺内分流率的影响[J]. 广西医学, 2014, 36(12): 1728-1730.
    王雅聪, 李淑丽, 陈晓明. 腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉用于分娩潜伏期延长产妇镇痛的临床研究[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2017, 21(15): 92-94.
  • 期刊类型引用(4)

    1. 余晓伊, 格日勒. 不同他汀类药物对急性心肌梗死患者血管内皮功能、心脏功能的影响. 中国现代医生. 2020(06): 90-93 . 百度学术
    2. 程乾堃. 不同剂量他汀类药物在急性心肌梗死早期患者中的应用效果比较. 中国当代医药. 2020(10): 50-52+59 . 百度学术
    3. 杨柳, 熊晓波, 李艳. 血尿酸、Hcy、T细胞和血脂在急性冠脉综合征患者中的表达水平及相关性分析. 川北医学院学报. 2020(04): 687-690 . 百度学术
    4. 王燕, 王小艳, 刘丽伟, 王玉宏. 依折麦布联合瑞舒伐他汀治疗低密度脂蛋白胆固醇未达标的急性冠状动脉综合征的临床研究. 现代药物与临床. 2018(12): 3161-3166 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(0)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  397
  • HTML全文浏览量:  93
  • PDF下载量:  13
  • 被引次数: 4
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-03-11
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-08-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回