宫腔纱布填塞术与宫腔水囊压迫法治疗阴道分娩产后出血的疗效比较

皮兴芳; 刘艳妮

doi:10.7619/jcmp.202015020

宫腔纱布填塞术与宫腔水囊压迫法治疗阴道分娩产后出血的疗效比较

皮兴芳¹,
刘艳妮^2, ,

1. 陕西省安康市妇幼保健院妇产二科, 陕西安康, 725000;
2. 延安大学附属医院妇产科二病区, 陕西延安, 716000

详细信息

通讯作者:
刘艳妮,E-mail:147857584@qq.com

中图分类号: R714.461
计量
- 文章访问数: 464
- HTML全文浏览量: 128
- PDF下载量: 9
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-05-08
- 发布日期: 2020-09-09

Intrauterine gauze packing versus intrauterine water sac compression in treatment of postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery

PI Xingfang¹,
LIU Yanni^2, ,

1. The Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankang City Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Ankang, Shaanxi, 725000;
2. The Second Ward of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University, Yan'an, Shaanxi, 716000

摘要

摘要: 目的比较宫腔纱布填塞术、宫腔水囊压迫法治疗阴道分娩产后出血的疗效。方法根据治疗方法将80例患者分为研究组和对照组,每组40例。对照组采用宫腔纱布填塞术治疗,研究组采用宫腔水囊压迫法治疗,比较2组治疗效果。结果治疗后,研究组止血有效率为97.50%, 高于对照组的80.00%, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 研究组操作时间、止血显效时间、填塞物留置时间短于对照组,血红蛋白水平高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 研究组不良反应发生率为5.00%, 低于对照组的22.50%, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论阴道分娩产后出血治疗中,宫腔水囊压迫法止血效果优于宫腔纱布填塞术,且不良反应发生率更低。
- 阴道分娩 /
- 产后出血 /
- 宫腔纱布填塞术 /
- 宫腔水囊压迫法
Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of intrauterine gauze packing and intrauterine water sac compression on postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery. Methods According to the treatment method, a total of 80 patients were divided into study group and control group, with 40 cases in each group. The control group was treated with intrauterine gauze packing, while the study group was treated with intrauterine water sac compression, and the therapeutic effects in the two groups were compared. Results After treatment, the effective rate of hemostasis in the study group was 97.50%, which was significantly higher than 80.00% in the control group(P<0.05), the operation time, hemostatic effect time and packing indwelling time in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group, and the hemoglobin level was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05), the incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was 5.00%, which was significantly lower than 22.50% in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of bleeding after vaginal delivery, the hemostatic effect of intrauterine water sac compression is better than that of intrauterine gauze packing, and the incidence of adverse reactions is lower.
- vaginal delivery /
- postpartum hemorrhage /
- intrauterine gauze packing /
- intrauterine water sac compression

HTML全文

参考文献(22)

赵亮, 孙丽芳, 郑秀丽, 等. 子宫动脉结扎与盆腔动脉栓塞治疗难治性产后出血的效果研究[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2018, 19(3):202-204.

陈淑敏. 产科大出血患者成分输血及影响因素研究[J]. 临床研究, 2019(9):74-75.

赵凌, 熊婷, 谢娟, 等. 产科大出血患者成分输血及影响因素分析[J]. 中国输血杂志, 2018, 31(9):967-971.

杨杨. 宫颈钳夹与宫腔水囊填塞联合阴道后穹窿纱条填塞治疗产后出血的效果[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2018, 33(24):6009-6012.

程华, 陈蓉, 赵轩胤, 等. 宫腔内放置球囊对产后出血的疗效及感染率和WBC水平的影响[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2018, 19(5):443-444.

谢幸. 妇产科学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2001:11-16.

韩娜, 方海艳, 韩姗姗, 等. 补气凉血汤联合米索前列醇治疗产后出血的疗效及对氧化应激和炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2018, 36(11):2784-2787.

徐崧圆, 梁升连, 曹丽霞, 等. 新型产后出血诊疗系统软件的临床应用[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019(30):3726-3730, 3735.

杨艳芬, 卢丽敏. 欣母沛与马来酸麦角新碱对阴道分娩产后出血的预防效果及子宫复旧的影响[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2019, 20(3):258-259.

陈秀英, 武璁. 产后出血改良B-Lynch缝合术102例分析及随访结局[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2018, 19(1):71-72.

常青, 刘艳丽, 徐杨. 产后出血危险因素及预警评估研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2019, 19(7):1092-1096.

赵菁, 丛雪, 王兆年, 等. 产后出血预警评估工具的构建及验证[J]. 中国护理管理, 2019, 19(11):1649-1654.

王军, 徐娟, 程义玲. 胎盘粘连对经阴道分娩产后出血的影响及相关因素分析[J]. 湖南师范大学学报:医学版, 2019, 16(6):150-152.

徐鑫, 花晓琳, 金敏菲. 凶险型前置胎盘术中纱布填塞宫腔压迫胎盘止血的研究[J]. 中国地方病防治杂志, 2018, 33(5):594-594

, 596.

李妙花. B-Lynch缝合术与宫腔纱布填塞治疗难治性产后出血的疗效比较[J]. 中国基层医药, 2017, 24(16):2483-2486.

吕昕瞳. 宫腔水囊压迫止血法治疗产后出血的疗效[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2019, 25(17):137-138.

朱颖, 张晶, 宋伟夫, 等. 宫腔水囊压迫法治疗阴道分娩产后出血的疗效[J]. 中国性科学, 2019, 28(8):74-77.

李秀桃, 郝声宇. 宫腔水囊压迫与宫腔纱条填塞治疗剖宫产产后出血的疗效分析[J]. 河北医学, 2018, 24(1):100-104.

杨红芳. 纱布填塞与宫腔水囊压迫治疗产后大出血的临床效果比较[J]. 健康之友, 2020(5):280-281.

郑玉霞. 纱布填塞与宫腔水囊压迫治疗产后大出血的临床效果比较[J]. 河南外科学杂志, 2016, 22(3):114-115.

马延巾. 子宫动脉结扎联合宫腔水囊压迫治疗剖宫产难治性产后出血的临床分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2020, 18(5):64-64.

李净. 宫腔水囊压迫与宫腔纱条填塞治疗剖宫产产后出血的临床观察[J]. 中国医药指南, 2020, 18(6):140-141.

施引文献(3)

期刊类型引用(2)

1.	代晓娟，温凯，许可. 平鳍式种植体与螺纹式种植体对口腔种植患者经济负担与并发症的影响. 中国美容医学. 2023(03): 144-147 . 百度学术
2.	王雪红，陈彩云，李莹. 低能量激光疗法治疗种植体周围炎患者的临床效果. 现代养生. 2023(17): 1288-1290 . 百度学术