Comparison of single thoracic drainage tube and double thoracic drainage tube after upper pulmonary lobectomy
-
摘要: 目的 比较单根胸腔引流管与双胸腔引流管在肺上叶切除术后的应用效果。 方法 回顾性分析行上肺叶切除术的60例患者的临床资料,将其分为单胸腔引流管组(A组)和双胸腔引流管组(B组)。比较2组患者临床效果。 结果 2组术后皮下气肿、术后增加置管、拔管后再次穿刺抽气、抽液的发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组带管时间、术后住院时间短于B组,术后疼痛评分优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 肺上叶切除术后应用单胸腔引流管引流效果优于双胸腔引流管,且能缓解术后疼痛,缩短带管时间与住院时间。Abstract: Objective To compare effect of single thoracic drainage tube and double thoracic drainage tube after upper pulmonary lobectomy. Methods The data of 60 patients who underwent upper pulmonary lobectomy was retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into single thoracic drainage tube(A group)and double thoracic drainage tube(B group). Clinical effect in both the groups was compared. Results There were no differences in incidence rates of subcutaneous emphysema after surgery, adding catheterization after surgery, and gas and liquid aspiration by puncture after extubation between the two groups(P>0.05). The catheter-indwelling duration and postoperative hospital stay in the group A were significantly shorter than those in group B, and the postoperative pain score was significantly better than that in group B(P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of single tube is better than that of double thoracic drainage tube after upper pulmonary lobectomy, and it can relieve postoperative pain, shorten the time of indwelling tube and hospital stay.
-
Keywords:
- upper pulmonary lobectomy /
- chest drainage tube /
- efficacy of drainage /
- pain
-
-
XIE H Y, XU K, TANG J X, et al. A prospective randomized, controlled trial deems a drainage of 300 ml/day safe before removal of the last chest drain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2015, 21(2): 200-205.
ZARDO P, BUSK H, KUTSCHKA I. Chest tube management: state of the art[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2015, 28(1): 45-49.
ALEX J, ANSARI J, BAHALKAR P, et al. Comparison of the immediate postoperative outcome of using the conventional two drains versus a single drain after lobectomy[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2003, 76(4): 1046-1049.
TANAKA M, SAGAWA M, USUDA K, et al. Postoperative drainage with one chest tube is appropriate for pulmonary lobectomy: a randomized trial[J]. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2014, 232(1): 55-61.
ZHOU D, DENG X F, LIU Q X, et al. Single chest tube drainage is superior to double chest tube drainage after lobectomy: a meta-analysis[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2016, 11(1): 88.
ANDREETTI C, MENNA C, IBRAHIM M, et al. Postoperative pain control: videothoracoscopic versus conservative mini-thoracotomic approach[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2014, 46(5): 907-912.
JIWNANI S, MEHTA M, KARIMUNDACKAL G, et al. Early removal of chest tubes after lung resection: VATS the reason[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012, 41(2): 464.
柏强, 刘春全, 崔永. 肺癌肺上叶切除术后单管胸腔闭式引流的回顾性分析[J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2019, 22(3): 157-160. 刘晓青, 赵菲, 戴纪刚, 等. 肺癌术后单管与双管胸腔闭式引流疗效比较的系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2019, 26(6): 583-589. 闵波, 朱逸, 王成祥, 等. 单根细管引流联合早期拔管在肺癌患者胸腔镜肺叶切除术的应用[J]. 江苏医药, 2019, 45(11): 1100-1104. 戴维, 冯飞跃, 王大力. 肺叶切除术后单、双胸腔引流管的临床应用[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2013, 18(2): 327-329. 张德明, 赵金平. 两种胸腔引流方式在肺叶切除术后患者中应用的病例对照研究[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2016, 23(2): 156-159. 吴铁城, 张剑玲, 靳振生. 负压球细管引流在胸外科的临床应用[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2010, 17(6): 529-529. 马丹, 杨梅, 樊骏, 等. 胸腔镜肺叶切除术后引流管管径对患者舒适度影响的前瞻性队列研究[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2015(10): 928-931. 刘武新, 马海涛, 黄海涛. 单操作孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术后不同胸腔引流效果分析[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志, 2019(9): 515-519. -
期刊类型引用(4)
1. 张楠，王苗，张鹏，马超，郜顺兴，刘红正，陶晓冰. 退变性腰椎疾病后路开放性手术后引流管口留置方式对切口感染及切口愈合影响. 临床军医杂志. 2024(02): 183-185 . 
百度学术
2. 韩志伟，胡文滕，马敏杰，蔺瑞江，李琼，王晨晗，韩彪. 带金属支撑的多侧孔超细引流管对单孔胸腔镜肺上叶切除术后胸腔残腔形成影响的单中心回顾性研究. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志. 2024(03): 397-402 . 百度学术
3. 麻晓斌，柴立勋，贾晓斌，王玉璇. 非小细胞肺癌患者胸腔镜肺上叶切除术后不同负压胸腔闭式引流术效果对比观察. 山东医药. 2024(08): 48-50 . 百度学术
4. 闫涛，孟元光，陈忠民，侯羿，吕伟，王争明，雷磊，杨硕，任召祺，王琛，许敏光. 一种新型防堵塞腹腔引流管的研制. 中国医学装备. 2022(08): 161-164 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 269
- HTML全文浏览量: 34
- PDF下载量: 8
- 被引次数: 8
下载:
苏公网安备 32100302010246号