环乳晕切口术对乳腺纤维瘤患者乳晕区感觉神经功能的影响

董向阳, 黄红梅, 曹余彦

董向阳, 黄红梅, 曹余彦. 环乳晕切口术对乳腺纤维瘤患者乳晕区感觉神经功能的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(23): 24-26,52. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202023008
引用本文: 董向阳, 黄红梅, 曹余彦. 环乳晕切口术对乳腺纤维瘤患者乳晕区感觉神经功能的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(23): 24-26,52. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202023008
DONG Xiangyang, HUANG Hongmei, CAO Yuyan. Effect of circumareolar incision surgery on the sensory nerve function of the areola region in patients with breast fibroma[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(23): 24-26,52. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202023008
Citation: DONG Xiangyang, HUANG Hongmei, CAO Yuyan. Effect of circumareolar incision surgery on the sensory nerve function of the areola region in patients with breast fibroma[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(23): 24-26,52. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202023008

环乳晕切口术对乳腺纤维瘤患者乳晕区感觉神经功能的影响

基金项目: 

江西省卫生健康委科技计划项目(20202050)

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: R737.9;R619

Effect of circumareolar incision surgery on the sensory nerve function of the areola region in patients with breast fibroma

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨环乳晕切口术对乳腺纤维瘤患者手术指标及乳晕区感觉神经功能的影响。 方法 将80例乳腺纤维瘤患者随机分为对照组和观察组,每组40例。对照组采取放射状切口术治疗,观察组采取环乳晕切口术治疗,比较2组手术相关指标、乳晕区感觉神经功能状况、瘢痕愈合情况等。 结果 观察组手术时间、瘢痕长度短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后伤口一期愈合率、双侧乳房基本对称率均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后1 d、术后6个月乳晕区神经功能优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后2、4、6个月瘢痕愈合评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 环乳晕切口术治疗乳腺纤维瘤的效果优于放射状切口术,美观效果较好,可减少对乳晕区感觉神经功能的损伤。
    Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of circumareolar incision surgery on surgical indexes and sensory nerve function of the areola region in patients with breast fibroma. Methods A total of 80 patients with mammary fibroma were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 40 cases in each group. The control group was treated with radial incision surgery, while the observation group was treated with circumareolar incision surgery. The operative indicators, sensory nerve function in the areola area and scar healing were compared between the two groups. Results The operative time and scar length of the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group, and the intraoperative blood loss was significantly less than that in the control group(P<0.05). The primary healing rate of postoperative wound and basic symmetry rate of bilateral breasts in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). The nerve function in the areola area of the observation group at 1 day and 6 months after operation was significantly better than that of the control group(P<0.05). The scar healing scores of the observation group at 2, 4 and 6 months after operation were significantly lower than those of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Ring-areola incision in the treatment of mammary fibroma has better efficacy than that of radial incision, which has good aesthetics and can reduce the damage of sensory nerve function in the areola area.
  • 陈杰. 环乳晕切口手术方式治疗乳腺纤维腺瘤患者的疗效分析[J]. 中华全科医学,2016,14(1): 60-62.

    闫存礼,夏秀林,侯林都,等. 环乳晕切口行乳腺纤维腺瘤切除术的效果观察[J]. 广西医学,2016,38(8): 1169-1170

    ,1173.

    张英辉. 环乳晕切口和传统放射状切口治疗乳腺纤维瘤的临床对比[J]. 山西医药杂志,2016,45(6): 678-681.
    董华英,王伟,汤鹏,等. 环乳晕切口前入路切除乳腺多发性纤维腺瘤1例[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志,2016,21(1): 93-94.
    丁韬,魏涧. 经腋前线VABS与经乳晕切口常规手术在乳腺纤维瘤病灶切除中的应用对比[J]. 现代医学,2017,45(7): 916-918.
    周用,罗保平. 桂枝茯苓胶囊联合手术治疗对多发乳腺纤维瘤患者疗效及性激素水平影响分析[J]. 贵州医药,2019,43(9): 1440-1442.
    孙甲甲,黄景昊,刘伟,等. 不同路径手术在乳腺纤维瘤患者中应用研究[J]. 临床军医杂志,2018,46(6): 676-677

    ,681.

    方谭玮,俸瑞发. 放射状切口与环乳晕切口乳腺纤维瘤切除术的临床效果比较[J]. 医学临床研究,2017,34(1): 49-50

    ,53.

    张明亮,金功圣,钱军. 改良式双环乳晕切口在多中心乳腺纤维腺瘤中的应用优势探讨[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志,2017,22(6): 553-556.
    邹敏. 改良乳晕区切口在乳腺纤维腺瘤手术中的应用观察[J]. 实用癌症杂志,2019,34(9): 1488-1490.
    何俭,刘晓夏,殷剑波. 乳晕内切口切除多发乳腺纤维腺瘤的美学效果[J]. 中华医学美学美容杂志,2017,23(4): 252-254.
    徐文彬,颜太琼. 不同路径手术治疗对乳房纤维瘤病人预后与乳头乳晕皮肤感觉的影响[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报,2018,43(7): 874-876

    ,881.

    张明亮,金功圣,王岗,等. 双环乳晕切口在多中心乳腺良性肿瘤中的应用优势探讨[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志,2017,35(5): 579-583.
    范宝珍. 环乳晕弧形切口在乳腺良性肿瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志,2019(3): 203-204.
    吴迪,张文涛,霍彦平. 双环乳晕切口治疗多中心乳腺良性肿瘤的可行性分析[J]. 实用癌症杂志,2019,34(6): 895-897.
  • 期刊类型引用(9)

    1. 颅内支架价值评估专家共识. 中国医疗设备. 2024(08): 1-10 . 百度学术
    2. 高永开,杜伟. 支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术治疗急性期颅内破裂宽颈动脉瘤的临床安全性及有效性. 临床医学研究与实践. 2022(26): 66-69 . 百度学术
    3. 罗妙泉,王以舟,陈连辉. LVIS密网支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内宽颈小动脉瘤的临床研究. 海南医学. 2021(05): 610-613 . 百度学术
    4. 陈洋,李琳坤. 双LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内宽颈动脉瘤的安全性和有效性. 临床医学研究与实践. 2021(10): 56-58 . 百度学术
    5. 张子君. LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞在颅内宽颈动脉瘤中的临床应用效果. 医学理论与实践. 2021(09): 1514-1515 . 百度学术
    6. 易田康,王政,伍业,伍博. 双微导管技术及LVIS支架辅助栓塞术治疗急性期颅内宽颈动脉瘤的疗效及对患者血清SICAM-1水平与神经功能的影响. 海南医学. 2021(09): 1106-1109 . 百度学术
    7. 陈步翰,唐永生,何博源. 单纯弹簧圈栓塞与LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内破裂宽颈动脉瘤的疗效比较. 现代实用医学. 2021(04): 549-551 . 百度学术
    8. 田志华,李敏,黄可丰,段海锋,张浩,茹小红. Solitaire支架与LVIS/LVISjr支架置入辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内动脉瘤的临床效果比较. 中国临床实用医学. 2021(02): 6-9 . 百度学术
    9. 王永祥,杨成宝,陈春光. 颅内未破裂动脉瘤介入治疗效果及术后发生微小脑梗死的影响因素. 宁夏医科大学学报. 2021(12): 1247-1251 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(0)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  219
  • HTML全文浏览量:  45
  • PDF下载量:  8
  • 被引次数: 9
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-10-12
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-12-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回