不同麻醉方法对肺癌患者血流动力学及免疫功能的影响

周园, 陈海燕

周园, 陈海燕. 不同麻醉方法对肺癌患者血流动力学及免疫功能的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(24): 13-16. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202024004
引用本文: 周园, 陈海燕. 不同麻醉方法对肺癌患者血流动力学及免疫功能的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(24): 13-16. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202024004
ZHOU Yuan, CHEN Haiyan. Effect of different anesthesia methods on hemodynamics and immune function for patients with lung cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(24): 13-16. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202024004
Citation: ZHOU Yuan, CHEN Haiyan. Effect of different anesthesia methods on hemodynamics and immune function for patients with lung cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(24): 13-16. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202024004

不同麻醉方法对肺癌患者血流动力学及免疫功能的影响

基金项目: 

陕西省社会发展攻关项目(2015SF103)

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    陈海燕, E-mail: bbrep6@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R614;R734.2

Effect of different anesthesia methods on hemodynamics and immune function for patients with lung cancer

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨不同麻醉方法对肺癌患者的效果以及对应激指标、血流动力学、免疫功能的影响。 方法 将100例肺癌患者根据不同麻醉方式分为对照组(n=50)和观察组(n=50)。对照组给予全身麻醉,观察组给予超声引导椎旁神经阻滞麻醉。比较2组麻醉效果和围术期血流动力学、应激指标、免疫功能的变化。 结果 术后4、12 h, 观察组视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组术后Ramsay评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后4 h, 观察组心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 观察组皮质醇、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 观察组CD3+、CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+ 水平均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 超声引导椎旁神经阻滞麻醉可改善肺癌手术患者的应激指标,且对血流动力学、免疫功能影响小。
    Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of different anesthesia methods for patients with lung cancer and its influences on stress indexes, hemodynamics and immune function. Methods A total of 100 patients with lung cancer were divided into control group(n=50)and observation group(n=50)according to different anesthesia methods. The control group was given general anesthesia, and the observation group was given ultrasound-guided paravertebral block. The anesthesia effect, perioperative changes of hemodynamics, stress indexes and immune function were compared between the two groups. Results Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)scores at 4 and 12 h after operation in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative Ramsay scores between the two groups(P>0.05). At 4 h after operation, heart rate(HR), systolic blood pressure(SBP)and mean arterial pressure(MAP)in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). The levels of cortisol, tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α)and interleukin-6(IL-6)in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). The levels of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided paravertebral block can improve the stress indexes, and has little impacts on the hemodynamics and immune function for lung cancer surgery patients.
  • 闫辉, 李正明, 张莲花, 等. 羟考酮联合肋间神经阻滞在老年患者胸科术后镇痛中的临床观察[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2017, 37(4): 719-723.
    商丽华, 王翔宇, 肖甄男, 等. 超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞的研究进展[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2018, 41(3): 277-279.

    ABO-ZEID M A, ELGAMAL M M, HEWIDY A A, et al. Ultrasound-guided multilevel paravertebral block versus local anesthesia for medical thoracoscopy[J]. Saudi J Anaesth, 2017, 11(4): 442-448.

    ROBBA C, QEVA E, BORSELLINO B, et al. Effects of propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia induction on hemodynamics in patients undergoing fiberoptic intubation for cervical spine surgery: a randomized, controlled, clinical trial[J]. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 2017, 33(2): 215-220.

    连洋洋, 张伟. 不同剂量右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因行胸椎旁神经阻滞在肺癌根治术中的应用[J]. 中国临床研究, 2018, 31(4): 447-450.
    刘先岭, 智明明, 王静静, 等. 胸椎旁神经阻滞复合全身麻醉对胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者镇痛及免疫细胞功能的影响[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2017, 27(22): 47-51.

    TAKETA Y, FUJITANI T, IRISAWA Y, et al. Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block by the paralaminar in-plane approach using a microconvex array transducer: methodological utility based on anatomical structures[J]. J Anesth, 2017, 31(2): 271-277.

    李洋, 卫木根, 陈玉华. 不同麻醉方式对老年肺癌根治术患者术后认知功能的影响[J]. 中国临床保健杂志, 2017, 20(3): 303-305.

    SALVIZ E A, SIVRIKOZ N, OZONUR A, et al. Ultrasound-guided bilateral thoracic paravertebral blocks as an adjunct to general anesthesia in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty: a historical cohort study[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2017, 139(1): 20e-28e.

    郭芳, 王存金, 龙丰云, 等. 罗哌卡因复合右美托咪定多靶点胸椎旁神经阻滞超前镇痛对肺癌手术术后镇痛的影响[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2017, 40(12): 1087-1090.

    KUMAR A, SINHA C, KUMAR A, et al. The effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine compared to propofol on patients hemodynamics as a sedative in brachial plexus block: a comparative study[J]. Anesth Essays Res, 2017, 11(1): 201-205.

    MAYUR N, DAS A, BISWAS H, et al. Effect of clonidine as adjuvant in thoracic paravertebral block for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study[J]. Anesth Essays Res, 2017, 11(4): 864-870.

    孙铭阳, 丛旭晖, 张丽媛, 等. 胸椎旁神经阻滞联合全身麻醉用于单操作孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者的改良效果[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2018, 38(8): 973-977.
    吴悠扬, 周春丽. 超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞对胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者术后红细胞免疫、细胞免疫和应激水平的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2018, 27(32): 3624-3627.
    张伟, 孙铭阳, 李冰, 等. 麻醉因素对胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者肺损伤的影响: 右美托咪定混合罗哌卡因胸椎旁神经阻滞联合全麻的效果[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2018, 38(1): 34-39.
  • 期刊类型引用(11)

    1. 涂兵英,涂腾兵,吴莉娅,杨柳青. 风险管理在消毒供应中心外来医疗器械管理中的应用效果. 医疗装备. 2022(01): 64-66 . 百度学术
    2. 卫妍. 信息追溯系统在腔镜器械消毒管理中的应用. 西藏医药. 2022(01): 8-9 . 百度学术
    3. 江莉娟,卢又虹,钟晓敏. 建立sop对提高管腔器械清洗质量中应用. 中国医疗器械信息. 2022(18): 161-163 . 百度学术
    4. 杨晨希. 硬式内窥镜的清洗消毒灭菌方法探讨与标准化流程的建立. 临床医药文献电子杂志. 2020(31): 182 . 百度学术
    5. 李程. 标准化流程护理措施对腹腔镜器械清洗质量及灭菌效果的影响. 吉林医学. 2020(12): 3020-3022 . 百度学术
    6. 李婷婷,高兴莲,黄靖,甘琴,董琦. 品质管理联合预防性护理模式对腹腔镜妇科手术感染控制及护理质量的影响. 全科护理. 2019(19): 2383-2385 . 百度学术
    7. 申梅岭. 标准化流程在医院消毒供应室器械消毒灭菌中的应用价值分析. 中国卫生产业. 2019(17): 74-75 . 百度学术
    8. 王颖. 系统化护理模式对腹腔镜妇科手术感染预防的影响. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志. 2019(27): 182 . 百度学术
    9. 赖丙娇,肖婉静,黄庆英. 科室联系制度在消毒供应室质量管理中的应用效果. 护理实践与研究. 2019(21): 137-138 . 百度学术
    10. 王宇徽. 标准操作程序在基层医院腔镜器械清洗消毒中的效果评价. 世界最新医学信息文摘. 2018(23): 180+189 . 百度学术
    11. 齐文慧. 腹腔镜器械的清洗、消毒工作中持续质量改进管理的价值分析. 中国医疗器械信息. 2018(08): 100-101+157 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(0)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  615
  • HTML全文浏览量:  133
  • PDF下载量:  20
  • 被引次数: 11
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-10-14
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-12-29

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回