小组活动式健康教育对冠心病患者社会支持及自我管理行为的影响

刘楠; 陈迪; 毛秋芬; 余虹

doi:10.7619/jcmp.202024023

小组活动式健康教育对冠心病患者社会支持及自我管理行为的影响

江苏省常州市第二人民医院阳湖院区介入导管室, 江苏常州, 213000

详细信息

通讯作者:
陈迪, E-mail: 928435051@qq.com

中图分类号: R541.4;R472
计量
- 文章访问数: 266
- HTML全文浏览量: 33
- PDF下载量: 11
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-11-14
- 网络出版日期: 2020-12-29

Influence of group-activity health education on social support and self-management behaviour in patients with coronary heart disease

Room of Interventional Catheter, Yanghu Branch of Changzhou City Second People's Hospital in Jiangsu Province, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213000

摘要

摘要: 目的探讨小组活动式健康教育对冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)患者社会支持及自我管理行为的影响。方法将2018年1—8月收治的67例冠心病PCI后患者设为试验组, 2017年6—12月收治的61例冠心病PCI后患者设为对照组。对照组给予常规健康教育,试验组在对照组基础上联合应用小组活动式健康教育。随访6个月,比较2组社会支持、自我管理行为、生活质量及预后。结果随访6个月时,试验组患者主观支持、客观支持、社会支持利用度、社会支持总分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 试验组患者不良嗜好管理、症状管理、疾病知识管理、治疗依从性管理评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01); 试验组患者躯体受限程度、心绞痛稳定性、治疗满意度、疾病认知程度评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 试验组心血管事件发生率、再入院率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论小组活动式健康教育能够提高冠心病PCI后患者的社会支持水平,促进自我管理行为的养成,改善患者生活质量。
- 冠心病 /
- 经皮冠状动脉介入术 /
- 健康教育 /
- 社会支持 /
- 自我管理行为
Abstract: Objective To explore the influence of group-activity health education on social support and self-management behaviour in coronary heart disease patients with percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). Methods Totally 67 patients with coronary heart disease after PCI from January to August 2018 were selected as experimental group, and 61 coronary heart disease patients after PCI from June to December 2017 were selected as control group. The control group was given routine health education, and the experimental group was given group-activity health education on the basis of the control group. After 6 months of follow-up, the social support, self-management behaviour, quality of life and prognosis were compared between the two groups. Results After 6 months of follow-up, the scores of subjective support, objective support, social support utilization and total social support in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05); the scores of adverse hobby management, symptom management, disease knowledge management and therapeutic compliance management in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05 or P<0.01); the scores of physical limitation, angina stability, therapeutic satisfaction degree and disease cognition in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05); the incidence of cardiovascular events and readmission rate in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Group-activity health education can improve the social support level of patients with coronary heart disease after PCI, promote the development of self-management behaviour, and improve - the quality of life of patients.
- coronary heart disease /
- percutaneous coronary intervention /
- health education /
- social support /
- self-management behaviour

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

陈莉, 莫文平, 吴丽, 等. 大连市心血管疾病患者自我管理行为现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国健康教育, 2019, 35(4): 365-366.

HSU S Y, HUANG H S. Improving Depression, Hope, and Quality of Life in Dialysis Patients Using Health Promotion Education Groups[J]. Hu Li Za Zhi, 2019, 66(4): 29-39.

FIHN S D, GARDIN J M, ABRAMS J, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012, 60(24): e44-e164.

中华医学会心血管病学分会介入心脏病学组. 中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会血栓防治专业委员会. 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南(2016)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2016, 44(5): 382-400.

汪向东, 王希林, 马弘, 等. 心理卫生评定量表手册[M]. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999: 109-378.

任洪艳, 唐萍, 赵庆华. 冠心病自我管理量表的开发与评价[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2009, 31(11): 1087-1090.

SPERT J A, WINDERS J A, DWEHURST T A, et al. Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease[J]. Am J Cardiac, 1994, 74(12): 1240-1244.

陈伟伟, 高润霖, 朱曼璐, 等. 中国心血管病报告编写组. 《中国心血管病报告2017》概要[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2018, 33(1): 1-8.

FANG J, HUANG B, XU D, et al. Innovative Application of a Home-Based and Remote Sensing Cardiac Rehabilitation Protocol in Chinese Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention[J]. Telemed J E Health, 2019, 25(4): 288-293.

彭文英. 小组体验式教育对老年糖尿病患者自护能力及血糖水平的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(6): 55-57

, 61.

闫丹凤, 王斌全. 团体心理辅导对中国学生社会支持影响的Meta分析[J]. 护理研究, 2019, 33(10): 1692-1696.

王玲, 孙丹, 郑莉. 肝移植受者术后小组活动健康教育的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(6): 64-67.

DORJE T, ZHAO G, SCHEER A, et al. SMARTphone and social media-based Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention(SMART-CR/SP)for patients with coronary heart disease in China: a randomised controlled trial protocol[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(6): e21908.

蔡建, 梁洁, 姚岚, 等. 移动健康平台联合同伴支持教育在2型糖尿病患者中的作用[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2019, 34(12): 1146-1148

, 1151.

白雪姣, 李素萍, 赵娟, 等. 情绪智力团体健康教育在成年早期抑郁症患者中的应用研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2017, 14(8): 599-603.