4种免疫抑制剂治疗原发免疫性血小板减少症比较研究

Comparision of four types of immunosuppressive agents in treating patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia

  • 摘要: 目的 观察不同类型的免疫抑制剂治疗原发免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)成人患者的临床效果。 方法 将120例ITP患者分成环磷酰胺组、达那唑组、利妥昔组、环孢素组,每组30例。环磷酰胺组给予环磷酰胺进行治疗,达那唑组给予达那唑胶囊治疗,利妥昔单抗组给予利妥昔单抗治疗,环孢素组给予环孢素治疗。比较4组的近期和远期疗效。 结果 4组近期疗效从高到低依次为环孢素组、利妥昔组、环磷酰胺组、达那唑组; 远期疗效从高到低依次为利妥昔组、环孢素组、环磷酰胺组、达那唑组,且4组组间总有效率比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 利妥昔单抗、环孢素治疗ITP的疗效优于环磷酰胺、达那唑。

     

    Abstract: Objective To observe the clinical effect of different types of immunosuppressive agents in treating adult patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia(ITP). Methods A total of 120 patients with ITP were divided into cyclophosphamide group, danazol group, rituximab group and ciclosporin group, with 30 cases in each group. The cyclophosphamide group was treated with cyclophosphamide, the danazol group was treated with danazol capsules, rituximab group was treated with rituximab, and ciclosporin group was treated with ciclosporin. The short -term and long -term efficacy of the four groups were compared. Results From high to low, the short-term efficacy of the four groups was ciclosporin group, rituximab group, cyclophosphamide group and danazol group, and the long-term efficacy of the four groups were rituximab group, ciclosporin group, cyclophosphamide group as well as danazol group, and the differences of total effective rate between the four groups were statistically significant(P< 0.05). Conclusion The efficacy of rituximab and ciclosporin in treatment of ITP are better than cyclophosphamide and danazol.

     

/

返回文章
返回