Analysis in influencing factors of group B Streptococcus infection in late pregnancy
-
摘要:目的 观察孕晚期孕妇的B族溶血性链球菌(GBS)感染情况并分析可能的危险因素。方法 选取接受正规产前GBS筛查的1 500例孕晚期孕妇作为观察对象,设计临床资料调查问卷,分析孕妇的临床资料,观察孕妇的GBS感染情况,采用单因素分析与多因素分析探讨诱发孕晚期GBS感染的危险因素。结果 1 500例孕晚期孕妇中,GBS阳性者225例,占15.00%;非感染组早产、低出生体质量儿、胎膜早破等不良妊娠结局的总发生率低于感染组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,孕前、孕早期、孕中期反复性阴道炎和妊娠期糖尿病、妊娠期高血压、孕期贫血、生活环境在农村、孕前体质量指数高均可能是导致孕晚期孕妇发生GBS感染的危险因素(OR>1,P < 0.05)。结论 孕晚期孕妇发生GBS感染可能受孕前、孕早期、孕中期阴道炎和妊娠期糖尿病、妊娠期高血压、孕期贫血等因素的影响。Abstract:Objective To observe the risk factors of group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection in late pregnancy, and to analyze the possible risk factors.Methods A total of 1 500 pregnant women in late pregnancy who received regular prenatal GBS screening were selected. The general situation questionnaire was designed, and the clinical data of pregnant women were recorded in details. The univariate and multivariate analysis were used to find out the influencing factors of GBS infection in late pregnancy.Results Among 1 500 pregnant women in late pregnancy, 225 cases of positive GBS were detected, accounting for 15.00%; the incidence of adverse outcomes such as premature birth, infant of low-birth weight, premature rupture of membranes in non-infection group was lower than that in the infection group (P < 0.05); multiple Logistic regression analysis showed that recurrent vaginitis in pre-pregnancy, early pregnancy and mid-pregnancy, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, gestational anemia, living environment in rural areas, high body mass index before pregnancy may be the influencing factors for GBS infection in late pregnancy (OR>1, P < 0.05).Conclusion GBS infection in late pregnancy is affected by recurrent vaginitis in pre-pregnancy, early pregnancy and mid-pregnancy, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, gestational anemia and other factors.
-
Keywords:
- late pregnancy /
- group B Streptococcus /
- infection /
- recurrent vaginitis /
- risk factors
-
-
表 1 2组孕妇一般资料比较(x±s)
组别 年龄/岁 孕次/次 产次/次 孕周/周 感染组(n=225) 28.12±3.61 3.11±0.56 2.11±0.65 35.89±1.22 非感染组(n=1 275) 28.54±3.21 3.12±0.63 2.13±0.58 36.02±1.20 表 2 2组不良妊娠结局比较[n(%)]
组别 早产 低出生体质量儿 胎膜早破 合计 感染组(n=225) 32(14.22) 23(10.22) 40(17.78) 95(42.22) 非感染组(n=1 275) 145(11.37) 110(8.63) 183(14.35) 438(34.35)* 与感染组比较, *P < 0.05。 表 3 孕晚期GBS感染影响因素的单因素分析(x±s)[n(%)]
影响因素 感染组(n=225) 非感染组(n=1 275) χ2/t P 年龄 20~30岁 156(69.33) 884(69.33) < 0.001 1.000 31~40岁 69(30.67) 391(30.67) 孕前反复性阴道炎 有 161(71.56) 630(49.41) 37.624 < 0.001 无 64(28.44) 645(50.59) 孕早期、孕中期反复性阴道炎 有 168(74.67) 610(47.84) 55.119 < 0.001 无 57(25.33) 665(52.16) 妊娠期糖尿病 有 170(75.56) 606(47.53) 60.160 < 0.001 无 55(24.44) 669(52.47) 妊娠期高血压 是 158(70.22) 587(46.04) 44.741 < 0.001 否 67(29.78) 688(53.96) 孕期贫血 是 140(62.22) 456(35.76) 55.907 < 0.001 否 85(37.78) 819(64.24) 生活环境 农村 171(76.00) 523(41.02) 94.132 < 0.001 城市 54(24.00) 752(58.98) 孕前体质量指数 ≥30 kg/m2 121(53.78) 323(25.33) 74.256 < 0.001 < 30 kg/m2 104(46.22) 952(74.67) 职业 无业 85(37.78) 482(37.80) < 0.001 0.994 固定职业 140(62.22) 793(62.20) 受教育程度 初中及以下 75(33.33) 425(33.33) < 0.001 1.000 中专或高中 120(53.33) 680(53.33) 大专及以上 30(13.33) 170(13.33) 产次/次 2.11±1.12 2.13±1.15 0.241 0.809 表 4 孕晚期GBS感染影响因素的多因素Logistic回归分析
危险因素 β SE Wald P OR 95%置信区间 孕前反复性阴道炎 0.946 0.158 35.838 < 0.001 2.576 1.890~3.511 孕早期、孕中期反复性阴道炎 1.167 0.163 51.144 < 0.001 3.213 2.333~4.424 妊娠期糖尿病 1.227 0.165 55.365 < 0.001 3.412 2.470~4.715 妊娠期高血压 1.017 0.156 42.341 < 0.001 2.764 2.035~3.754 孕期贫血 1.085 0.149 52.699 < 0.001 2.958 2.207~3.965 生活环境 1.565 0.166 88.934 < 0.001 4.783 3.455~6.622 孕前体质量指数 1.232 0.148 68.945 < 0.001 3.429 2.564~4.587 -
[1] 朱洁, 金冬冬, 吕弘道. 妊娠晚期GBS感染及血清hpl, E3与胎儿宫内窘迫及其妊娠结局[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2020, 28(12): 118-120. [2] ÁBRÓK M, TIGYI P, KOSTRZEWA M, et al. Evaluation of the results of Group B Streptococcus screening by MALDI-TOF MS among pregnant women in a hungarian hospital[J]. Pathogens, 2020, 9(1): 25-29. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861306
[3] DAI W, ZHANG Y C, XU Y, et al. The effect of group B streptococcus on maternal and infants' prognosis in Guizhou, China[J]. Biosci Rep, 2019, 39(12): 215-218. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31820803
[4] 谢幸, 孔北华, 段涛. 妇产科学[M]. 9版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 83-238. [5] SEALE A C, BAKER C J, BERKLEY J A, et al. Vaccines for maternal immunization against Group B Streptococcus disease: WHO perspectives on case ascertainment and case definitions[J]. Vaccine, 2019, 37(35): 4877-4885. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.012
[6] ARMISTEAD B, HERRERO-FONCUBIERTA P, COLEMAN M, et al. Lipid analogs reveal features critical for hemolysis and diminish granadaene mediated Group B Streptococcus infection[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1): 1502. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15282-0
[7] 张艺, 杜晨旭, 张适, 等. B族溶血性链球菌与围生期妇女妊娠结局的相关性分析[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2019, 29(22): 2757-2758, 2761. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWJZ201922022.htm [8] JI Y, ZHAO C, MA X X, et al. Outcome of a screening program for the prevention of neonatal early-onset group B Streptococcus infection: a population-based cohort study in Inner Mongolia, China[J]. J Med Microbiol, 2019, 68(5): 803-811. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000976
[9] LIN Y, YE J, LUO M, et al. Group B Streptococcus DNA copy numbers measured by digital PCR correlates with perinatal outcomes[J]. Anal Chem, 2019, 91(15): 9466-9471. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05872
[10] MUKHOPADHYAY S, PUOPOLO K M. Preventing neonatal group B Streptococcus disease: the limits of success[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2019, 173(3): 219-220. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4824
[11] 邓东阳, 陈蓉, 李学会. 妊娠晚期B族溶血性链球菌宫内感染血清IL-6和TNF-α表达水平与妊娠结局[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2020, 30(9): 119-122. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHYY202009025.htm [12] CHEN Z, WEN G, CAO X, et al. Group B Streptococcus colonisation and associated risk factors among pregnant women: a hospital-based study and implications for primary care[J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2019, 73(5): e13276. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13276
[13] 张霞, 吴思思, 谈红英, 等. 人工破膜对孕晚期生殖道B族溶血性链球菌定植孕妇母婴预后的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2020, 35(7): 1189-1193. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB202007009.htm [14] COLLIN S M, SHETTY N, LAMAGNI T. Invasive group B Streptococcus infections in adults, England, 2015-2016[J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2020, 26(6): 1174-1181. doi: 10.3201/eid2606.191141
[15] 余清源. 妊娠晚期孕妇B族溶血性链球菌感染对孕产妇母婴结局及凝血功能的影响[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2020, 26(1): 82-83. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XSZX202001034.htm [16] 李泓馨, 周林, 徐婧, 等. A族溶血性链球菌抗原检测的应用及药敏分析[J]. 北京医学, 2019, 41(11): 48-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJYX201911016.htm [17] COLLIN S M, LAMB P, JAUNEIKAITE E, et al. Hospital clusters of invasive Group B Streptococcal disease: a systematic review[J]. J Infect, 2019, 79(6): 521-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.11.008
[18] 杨梦楠, 花晓琳, 金敏菲, 等. 妊娠期B族链球菌感染现状及对母儿结局的影响[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2019, 28(3): 173-177. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDFC201903004.htm [19] 左麦红, 余丽雅, 陈倩. 1450例孕妇B族链球菌感染的高危因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(22): 77-80. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQYX202022016.htm -
期刊类型引用(2)
1. 张晓霞,冯玲. 5例HIV合并急性阑尾炎患者腹腔镜手术护理分析. 中国继续医学教育. 2020(05): 179-181 . 百度学术
2. 黄锐敏,杨艳艳. 心理护理干预应用于监管场所艾滋病患者中的实施意义. 吉林医学. 2020(11): 2786-2787 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(0)
计量
- 文章访问数: 384
- HTML全文浏览量: 214
- PDF下载量: 34
- 被引次数: 2