468例泌尿道感染患儿临床特点分析

杨焕丹, 张锐锋, 彭倩倩, 邱闪, 周苏芹

杨焕丹, 张锐锋, 彭倩倩, 邱闪, 周苏芹. 468例泌尿道感染患儿临床特点分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(14): 45-48. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20211225
引用本文: 杨焕丹, 张锐锋, 彭倩倩, 邱闪, 周苏芹. 468例泌尿道感染患儿临床特点分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(14): 45-48. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20211225
YANG Huandan, ZHANG Ruifeng, PENG Qianqian, QIU Shan, ZHOU Suqin. Clinical analysis of 468 children with urinary tract infection[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(14): 45-48. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20211225
Citation: YANG Huandan, ZHANG Ruifeng, PENG Qianqian, QIU Shan, ZHOU Suqin. Clinical analysis of 468 children with urinary tract infection[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(14): 45-48. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20211225

468例泌尿道感染患儿临床特点分析

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: R725;R691.3

Clinical analysis of 468 children with urinary tract infection

  • 摘要:
      目的  分析不同年龄段小儿泌尿道感染的临床特点、致病菌分布及影像学检查情况。
      方法  选取468例泌尿道感染患儿为研究对象,将其分为婴儿组(1个月~1岁)、幼儿组(>1~3岁)及儿童组(>3岁),分析3组的临床资料。
      结果  小儿泌尿道感染以婴幼儿多见,婴儿组中以发热为首发症状的患儿比率为52.15%,高于幼儿组(17.27%)及儿童组(5.23%),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);儿童组中尿路刺激征患儿比率为63.37%,高于婴儿组(8.60%)及幼儿组(41.82%),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);婴儿组中合并泌尿系发育异常者比率为32.80%,与幼儿组(21.82%)及儿童组(17.44%)比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。468例患儿中段尿培养检出病原菌共105例(22.43%),其中革兰阴性菌71例(67.62%),以大肠埃希菌为主;革兰阳性菌31例(29.52%),其中以屎肠球菌为主。
      结论  婴儿泌尿道感染患儿以男童多见,临床症状缺乏特异性,多以发热为临床表现,局部症状不明显,应注意尿常规检查。随着年龄的增长,女童泌尿道感染比率逐渐升高,临床以尿路刺激症状为主要表现的患儿比率也逐渐上升。泌尿道感染的病原菌仍以革兰阴性菌为主,大肠埃希菌占比最高,而革兰阳性菌中屎肠球菌的检出率也相对较高。
    Abstract:
      Objective  To analyze the clinical features, pathogens distribution and imaging examination conditions in children with urinary tract infection (UTI).
      Methods  A total of 468 UTI patients were selected, and were divided into infant group (1 month to 1 year old), toddler group (above 1 year to 3 years old) and children group (above 3 years old). Clinical data of the three groups were analyzed.
      Results  Urinary tract infection in children was more common in infants. In the infant group, the rate of children with fever as the first symptom was 52.15%, which was significantly higher than that in the infant group (17.27%) and the children group (5.23%) (P < 0.05). The rate of urinary tract irritation in children group was 63.37%, which was significantly higher than that in the infant group (8.60%) and the toddler group (41.82%) (P < 0.05). The rate of abnormal development of urinary tract in the infant group was 32.80%, which showed statistically significant difference compared with that in the toddler group (21.82%) and the children group (17.44%) (P < 0.05). In addition, 105(22.43%) were detected pathogens in 468 patients, including 71 cases with Gram-negative bacteria (67.62%), with Escherichia coli ranking first, and 31 with Gram-positive bacteria (29.52%), with Enterococcus faecium accounting for the most.
      Conclusion  Infant urinary tract infection is more common in boys, and the clinical symptoms are lack of specificity. Most of the clinical manifestations are fever, and local symptoms are not obvious, so routine urine detection should be paid attention. With the increase of age, the rate of urinary tract infection in girls is gradually increasing, and the rate of children with urinary tract irritationas the main clinical manifestation is also gradually increasing. Escherichia coli is still a common pathogen in children with UTI. The main pathogenic bacteria of urinary tract infection were Gram-negative bacilli, Escherichia coli accounted for the highest proportion, and the detection rate of Enterococcus faecium among Gram-positive bacteria is also relatively high.
  • 表  1   泌尿系畸形患儿泌尿道彩超检查结果

    泌尿道畸形 n 比率/%
    左肾积水 32 27.83
    左肾积水伴左输尿管扩张 31 26.96
    右肾集合系统分离 16 13.91
    双肾积水 4 3.48
    双肾积水伴输尿管扩张 9 7.83
    右肾积水 3 2.61
    右肾积水伴右输尿管扩张 6 5.22
    左肾盂扩张伴输尿管重复畸形 1 0.86
    左侧重复肾 2 1.74
    右侧巨输尿管 4 3.48
    后尿道瓣膜 3 2.61
    右肾发育不良 2 1.74
    右肾盂输尿管梗阻 1 0.86
    多囊肾 1 0.86
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   3组UTI彩超检查合并泌尿系发育异常患儿情况[n(%)]

    组别 合并泌尿系发育异常 无泌尿系发育异常
    婴儿组(n=186) 61(32.80) 125(67.20)
    幼儿组(n=110) 24(21.82)* 86(78.18)
    儿童组(n=172) 30(17.44)* 142(82.56)
    与婴儿组比较, * P<0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   468例UTI患儿病原菌阳性检出情况

    病原菌 n 比率/%
    革兰阴性菌 71 67.62
    大肠埃希菌 47 44.76
    肺炎克雷伯菌 9 8.57
    铜绿假单胞菌 7 6.67
    奇异变形杆菌 1 0.95
    嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌 3 2.86
    棒状杆菌 2 1.90
    产气肠杆菌 2 1.90
    革兰阳性球菌 31 29.52
    屎肠球菌 21 20.00
    粪肠球菌 9 8.57
    棉子糖肠球菌 1 0.95
    真菌 3 2.86
    白假丝酵母菌 3 2.86
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    SHAIKH N, MORONE N E, BOST J E, et al. Prevalence of urinary tract infection in childhood: a meta-analysis[J]. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2008, 27(4): 302-308. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31815e4122

    [2] 管娜. 欧洲2015年儿童泌尿系统感染诊治指南解读[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2016, 31(5): 337-340. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2016.05.005
    [3] 沈茜. 儿童泌尿道感染诊治规范[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2021, 36(5): 337-341. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101070-20210127-00115
    [4]

    KOSMERI C, KALAITZIDIS R, SIOMOU E. An update on renal scarring after urinary tract infection in children: what are the risk factors?[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2019, 15(6): 598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.010

    [5] 江载芳, 申昆玲, 沈颖. 诸福棠实用儿科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015: 110-115.
    [6] 中华医学会儿科学分会肾脏学组. 泌尿道感染诊治循证指南(2016)[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2017, 55(12): 898-901. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2017.12.005
    [7]

    LEUNG A K C, WONG A H C, LEUNG A A M, et al. Urinary tract infection in children[J]. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov, 2019, 13(1): 2-18. doi: 10.2174/1872213X13666181228154940

    [8]

    ZHANG H Y, WU Y B. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infection in children[J]. International Journal of Pediatrics, 2016, 43(7): 552-556.

    [9] 潘瑞英, 黄芸等. 婴儿泌尿系感染临床分析[J]. 当代医学, 2019, 25(32): 110-111. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2019.32.044
    [10]

    SCHROEDER A R, CHANG P W, SHEN M W, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the urinalysis for urinary tract infection in infants < 3 months of age[J]. Pediatrics, 2015, 135(6): 965-971. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0012

    [11] 徐虹, 张欣, 陈宏. 膀胱输尿管反流的精准诊治进展[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2016, 5(2): 56-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHSB201602003.htm
    [12]

    AKAGAWA Y, KIMATA T, AKAGAWA S, et al. Optimal bacterial colony counts for the diagnosis of upper urinary tract infections in infants[J]. Clin Exp Nephrol, 2020, 24(3): 253-258. doi: 10.1007/s10157-019-01812-8

    [13]

    COULTHARD M G. Defining urinary tract infection by bacterial colony counts: a case for 100, 000 colonies/ml as the best threshold[J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2019, 34(10): 1639-1649. doi: 10.1007/s00467-019-04283-x

    [14] 王晓林. 拉氧头孢治疗婴幼儿上尿路感染临床疗效分析[J]. 世界复合医学, 2018, 4(4): 48-50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJFH201804016.htm
    [15]

    SUBCOMMITTEE ON URINARY TRACT INFECTION, STEERING COMMITTEE ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT, ROBERTS K B. Urinary tract infection: clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of the initial UTI in febrile infants and children 2 to 24 months[J]. Pediatrics, 2011, 128(3): 595-610. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1330

    [16]

    STEIN R, DOGAN H S, HOEBEKE P, et al. Urinary tract infections in children: EAU/ESPU guidelines[J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 67(3): 546-558. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.007

    [17]

    YILDIZ Z A, CANDAN C, ARGA M, et al. Urinary tract infections in children with myelodysplasia in whom clean intermittent catheterization was administered[J]. Turk Pediatri Ars, 2014, 49(1): 36-41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078630

    [18]

    DEMIR H, TAŞAR M A. The significance of clinical and laboratory findings in predicting serious bacterial infections in children with acute fever without a focus[J]. J Pediatr Inf, 2020, 54(4): 215-223. doi: 10.5578/ced.69782

    [19]

    ZHANG X, XU H, ZHOU L, et al. Accuracy of early DMSA scan for VUR in young children with febrile UTI[J]. Pediatrics, 2014, 133(1): 30-38. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1689

    [20]

    AHMED M N, VANNOY D, FREDERICK A, et al. First-line antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli in children with urinary tract infection in emergency department and primary care clinics[J]. Clin Pediatr, 2016, 55(1): 19-28. doi: 10.1177/0009922815588822

    [21] 儿童社区获得性泌尿道感染产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠埃希菌的耐药性疾危险因素分析[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2019, 34(17): 1331-1334.
    [22] 姚瑶, 赵丽萍, 周红霞, 等. 无锡市1003例泌尿道感染患儿临床及病原菌分析[J]. 临床肾脏病杂志, 2020, 20(2): 104-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2390.2020.02.003
    [23] 吴祥, 朱冬菊. 攀枝花市儿童泌尿道感染病原菌及耐药性分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(3): 396-400. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2020.03.012
    [24]

    MOHAMMAD-JAFARI H, SAFFAR M J, NEMATE I, et al. Increasing antibiotic resistance among uropathogens isolated during years 2006-2009: impact on the empirical management[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2012, 38(1): 25-32. doi: 10.1590/S1677-55382012000100004

    [25] 黄楚君, 王德娟, 杨丽芬, 等. 尿路结构异常儿童合并泌尿系感染的病原菌分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志: 电子版, 2018, 12(4): 224-227. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2018.04.003
    [26]

    WANG J, HE L, SHA J, et al. Etiology and antimicrobial resistance patterns in pediatric urinary tract infection[J]. Pediatr Int, 2018, 60(5): 418-422. doi: 10.1111/ped.13526

  • 期刊类型引用(9)

    1. 刘盼梅,樊肖冲,刘青颖,马民玉. 糖尿病周围神经病变患者血清调节性T细胞相关因子与疼痛介质的关系. 实用临床医药杂志. 2025(04): 34-37+43 . 本站查看
    2. 孟含姝,宋雅,杨青伟,吴兴全. 基于“经脉-脏腑相关”理论的中医外治法治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的研究进展. 中国社区医师. 2025(07): 6-8 . 百度学术
    3. 杨晓峰,宋羽晶,李志永,周晓晨,王琳. 中医传统特色外治疗法在糖尿病周围神经病变患者中的应用进展研究. 中外医疗. 2024(15): 194-198 . 百度学术
    4. 牟新,刘超. 糖尿病中医治疗切入点的探讨与思考. 实用医学杂志. 2024(16): 2211-2218 . 百度学术
    5. 黄红. 穴位贴敷联合硫辛酸治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的临床效果分析. 大医生. 2024(15): 83-85 . 百度学术
    6. 金慧,史文俊,蒋威华,张英. 护理主导的耳穴压豆疗法对乳腺癌化疗所致周围神经病变的疗效观察. 实用临床医药杂志. 2024(16): 125-127+135 . 本站查看
    7. 王青,曹蓉,王瑶,闵鹏,戴欣珏,王彬. 自拟养血通络方联合八脉交会穴针刺治疗糖尿病周围神经病变临床观察. 湖北中医药大学学报. 2024(05): 75-78 . 百度学术
    8. 林惠鑫. 中药足浴、足底穴位按摩及护理干预对早期糖尿病足的疗效观察. 黑龙江中医药. 2024(03): 139-140 . 百度学术
    9. 刘必林,应亚云,许敬玲,李星,黄伟玲. 中药穴位敷贴+中药汤剂治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的价值研究. 糖尿病新世界. 2024(23): 1-4 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(5)

表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  382
  • HTML全文浏览量:  199
  • PDF下载量:  31
  • 被引次数: 14
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-03-21
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-07-25
  • 发布日期:  2021-07-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回