血清同型半胱氨酸与冠状动脉钙化积分对急性冠状动脉综合征患者短期预后的评估价值

安冬梅, 刘洁, 曹丽

安冬梅, 刘洁, 曹丽. 血清同型半胱氨酸与冠状动脉钙化积分对急性冠状动脉综合征患者短期预后的评估价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(10): 62-67. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214391
引用本文: 安冬梅, 刘洁, 曹丽. 血清同型半胱氨酸与冠状动脉钙化积分对急性冠状动脉综合征患者短期预后的评估价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(10): 62-67. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214391
AN Dongmei, LIU Jie, CAO Li. Evaluation value of serum homocysteine combined with coronary calcium score for short-term prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(10): 62-67. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214391
Citation: AN Dongmei, LIU Jie, CAO Li. Evaluation value of serum homocysteine combined with coronary calcium score for short-term prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(10): 62-67. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214391

血清同型半胱氨酸与冠状动脉钙化积分对急性冠状动脉综合征患者短期预后的评估价值

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    曹丽, E-mail: 15895366929@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R541.4;R446.1

Evaluation value of serum homocysteine combined with coronary calcium score for short-term prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome

  • 摘要:
    目的 

    探讨血清同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)与冠状动脉钙化积分(CCS)联合检测对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者短期预后的评估价值。

    方法 

    选取180例住院冠心病患者为研究对象, 根据病情程度分为ACS组84例与慢性稳定型心绞痛(SAP)组96例。随访12个月, 根据ACS患者随访期间主要心血管不良事件(MACE)发生情况分为事件组36例和非事件组48例。比较2组患者CCS、血清Hcy、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、空腹血糖(FPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平。分析ACS患者CCS与血清Hcy水平的相关性。分析随访12个月ACS患者MACE发生的危险因素。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估CCS与血清Hcy水平预测随访12个月ACS患者预后的价值。

    结果 

    ACS组血清Hcy、hs-CRP、LDL-C、FPG、HbA1c水平高于SAP组, 而CCS低于SAP组, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。ACS患者CCS与血清Hcy水平呈负相关(P < 0.05)。事件亚组ACS患者的CCS低于非事件亚组, 血清Hcy水平高于非事件组, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。血清Hcy是随访12个月ACS患者发生MACE的危险因素(OR=2.872, P=0.020), CCS是保护性因素(OR=0.459, P=0.011)。ROC曲线显示, 血清Hcy截断值为21.5 μmol/L、CCS截断值为410.0分, 联合预测的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.822, 敏感度为86.3%, 特异度为80.6%。

    结论 

    CCS与血清Hcy水平联合检测评估ACS患者短期预后结局的准确度较好。

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    To explore the evaluation value of detection of serum homocysteine (Hcy) combined with coronary calcium score (CCS) for short-term prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

    Methods 

    A total of 180 hospitalized patients with coronary heart disease were selected as research objects, and were divided into the ACS group (84 cases) and the stable angina pectoris (SAP)(96 cases) according to the severity of the disease.According to the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during the follow-up period of 12 months, ACS patients were divided into event sub-group (n=36) and non-event sub-group (n=48).CCS, serum Hcy, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of patients in two groups were compared.The correlation between CCS and serum Hcy level in ACS patients was analyzed.The main risk factors of MACE in ACS patients were analyzed after 12 months of follow-up.The value of CCS and serum Hcy level in predicting prognosis of ACS patients at 12 months follow-up was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

    Results 

    The serum levels of Hcy, hs-CRP, LDL-C, FPG and HbA1c in the ACS group were significantly higher than those in the SAP group, while the CCS was significantly lower than that in the SAP group (P < 0.05).CCS was negatively correlated with serum Hcy level in ACS patients (P < 0.05).The CCS of ACS patients in the event sub-group was significantly lower than that in the non-event sub-group, and the serum Hcy level was significantly higher than that in the non-event sub-group (P < 0.05).Serum Hcy was a risk factor for MACE in ACS patients followed up for 12 months (OR=2.872, P=0.020), and CCS was a protective factor (OR=0.459, P=0.011).The cut-off value of serum Hcy was 21.5 μmol/L, and the cut-off value of CCS was 410.0, the area under the curve (AUC) of joint prediction was 0.822, the sensitivity was 86.3%, and the specificity was 80.6%.

    Conclusion 

    The combination of CCS and serum Hcy level has good accuracy in evaluating the short-term outcome of ACS patients.

  • 图  1   血清Hcy与CCS预测ACS患者随访12个月预后的ROC曲线

    表  1   2组一般资料比较(x±s)[n(%)]

    组别 年龄/岁 体质量指数/(kg/m2) 吸烟 饮酒 高血压病史 糖尿病史
    ACS组(n=84) 60.3±8.5 49(58.3) 35(41.7) 26.6±2.4 26(31.0) 39(46.4) 49(58.3) 34(40.5)
    SAP组(n=96) 58.2±7.7 59(61.4) 37(38.6) 27.2±2.7 42(43.8) 56(58.3) 58(60.4) 47(49.0)
    ACS: 急性冠状动脉综合征; SAP: 慢性稳定型心绞痛。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   2组临床指标水平比较(x±s)

    组别 CCS/分 Hcy/(μmol/L) hs-CRP/(mg/L) LDL-C/(mmol/L) FPG/(mmol/L) HbA1c/%
    ACS组(n=84) 284.2±10.6* 20.5±3.6* 3.68±1.5* 3.95±0.5* 6.85±1.7* 6.1±0.5*
    SAP组(n=96) 427.1±21.3 13.7±2.2 2.35±1.2 3.67±0.4 6.23±1.1 5.3±0.4
    ACS: 急性冠状动脉综合征; SAP: 慢性稳定型心绞痛; CCS: 冠状动脉钙化积分; Hcy: 同型半胱氨酸; hs-CRP: 超敏C反应蛋白: LDL-C: 低密度脂蛋白胆固醇; FPG: 空腹血糖; HbA1c: 糖化血红蛋白。与SAP组比较, * P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   事件组与非事件组临床指标水平比较(x±s)

    组别 CCS/分 Hcy/(μmol/L) hs-CRP/(mg/L) LDL-C/(mmol/L) FPG/(mmol/L) HbA1c/%
    事件组(n=36) 391.2±12.4* 22.3±3.9* 3.74±1.31 4.12±0.62 7.02±0.89 6.2±0.8
    非事件组(n=48) 445.4±27.9 18.9±2.6 3.46±1.08 3.97±0.74 6.90±0.91 5.9±0.7
    CCS: 冠状动脉钙化积分; Hcy: 同型半胱氨酸; hs-CRP: 超敏C反应蛋白: LDL-C: 低密度脂蛋白胆固醇; FPG: 空腹血糖; HbA1c: 糖化血红蛋白。与非事件组比较, * P>0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   ACS组临床指标多元Logistic回归分析比较

      指标 β S. E. Wald系数 OR P 95%CI
    年龄 0.230 0.376 0.373 1.258 0.171 0.862~1.634
    CCS -0.779 0.284 7.518 0.459 0.011 0.351~0.689
    同型半胱氨酸 1.055 0.427 6.104 2.872 0.020 2.439~3.301
    超敏C反应蛋白 0.700 0.405 2.984 2.013 0.058 0.821~3.125
    低密度脂蛋白胆固醇 0.544 0.389 1.956 1.723 0.065 0.725~2.763
    空腹血糖 0.509 0.416 1.498 1.664 0.077 9.824~2.272
    糖化血红蛋白 0.197 0.203 0.944 1.218 0.085 0.736~1.753
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    ANDO H, AMANO T, MATSUBARA T, et al. Comparison of tissue characteristics between acute coronary syndrome and stable angina pectoris. An integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound analysis of culprit and non-culprit lesions[J]. Circ J, 2011, 75(2): 383-390. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-10-0815

    [2]

    PUCHNER S B, MAYRHOFER T, PARK J, et al. Differences in the association of total versus local coronary artery calcium with acute coronary syndrome and culprit lesions in patients with acute chest pain: the coronary calcium paradox[J]. Atherosclerosis, 2018, 274: 251-257. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.04.017

    [3]

    FOSCOLOU A, RALLIDIS L S, TSIREBOLOS G, et al. The association between homocysteine levels, Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular disease: a case-control study[J]. Int J Food Sci Nutr, 2019, 70(5): 603-611. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2018.1547688

    [4] 樊刚, 李波, 董莉, 等. 血管内超声与64排螺旋CT冠状动脉CTA对冠脉钙化病变定性、定量检测价值比较[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2021, 19(1): 90-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CTMR202101031.htm
    [5] 中华医学会心血管病学分会, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 慢性稳定性心绞痛诊断与治疗指南[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2007, 35(3): 195-206. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHXX200703001.htm
    [6] 中国医师协会急诊医师分会, 中华医学会心血管病学分会, 中华医学会检验医学分会. 急性冠脉综合征急诊快速诊疗指南[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志: 电子版, 2016, 9(2): 73-80. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWZD201602001.htm
    [7]

    BITTNER D O, TAKX R A P, STAZIAKI P V, et al. Identification of coronary artery calcification can optimize risk stratification in patients with acute chest pain[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2017, 249: 473-478. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.119

    [8] 王秀荣, 颜秉菊. 不同方法对急性冠状动脉综合征患者近期预后的预测价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(07): 75-80. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYZL202107019.htm
    [9]

    ADAMSON P D, WILLIAMS M C, DWECK M R, et al. Guiding therapy by coronary CT angiography improves outcomes in patients with stable chest pain[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 74(16): 2058-2070. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.085

    [10]

    KOOPMANN M, HINRICHS L, OLLIGS J, et al. Cardiac computed tomography in patients with symptomatic new-onset atrial fibrillation, rule-out acute coronary syndrome, but with intermediate pretest probability for coronary artery disease admitted to a chest pain unit[J]. Eur J Med Res, 2018, 23(1): 6. doi: 10.1186/s40001-018-0303-3

    [11]

    BRAININ P, OLSEN F J, LASSEN M C H, et al. Postsystolic shortening on echocardiography as a gateway to cardiac computed tomography in patients with suspected stable angina pectoris[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2020, 36(2): 309-316. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01724-4

    [12] 王志文, 王倩, 朱纯生. 64排CT冠脉成像在冠心病中的临床诊断价值分析[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2021, 5(13): 225-226. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXYY202113116.htm
    [13] 王忠启, 钟桥维, 廖宇光. 64-DSCTCA扫描技术对冠状动脉狭窄的诊断价值分析[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2020, 29(06): 1081-1082+1088. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYY202006027.htm
    [14]

    SIMON J, SZÁRAZ L, SZILVESZTER B, et al. Calcium scoring: a personalized probability assessment predicts the need for additional or alternative testing to coronary CT angiography[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(10): 5499-5506. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06921-7

    [15]

    SADAKA M A, EL-SHARKAWY E M, SOBHY M A, et al. Long-term prognostic implication of coronary plaque characterization as detected by 64-multidetector computed tomography in Egyptian population[J]. Egypt Heart J, 2017, 69(1): 63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2016.08.003

    [16]

    LI X X, BU S, DONG B, et al. The predictive values of GGT and Hcy in the risk stratifications and prognoses of NSTE-ACS patients[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2021, 13(8): 9269-9277.

    [17]

    ZHU M J, MAO M, LOU X S. Elevated homocysteine level and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis[J]. Biomarkers, 2019, 24(4): 309-316. doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2019.1589577

    [18]

    MIÑANA G, GIL-CAYUELA C, FÁCILA L, et al. Homocysteine and long-term recurrent infarction following an acute coronary syndrome[J]. Cardiol J, 2021, 28(4): 598-606. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0170

    [19]

    ZHAO Y F, ZHANG J. Clinical implication of homocysteine in premature acute coronary syndrome female patients: its distribution and association with clinical characteristics and major adverse cardiovascular events risk[J]. Medicine, 2021, 100(18): e25677. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025677

    [20] 程宝香, 曹雷. 冠状动脉粥样硬化心脏病患者血清同型半胱氨酸和超敏C反应蛋白表达特点及临床意义[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(06): 94-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYZL202006027.htm
    [21] 马强. 冠心病介入治疗后运用降同型半胱氨酸疗法的疗效及对患者血脂水平的影响[J]. 中国医学工程, 2022, 30(04): 67-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YCGC202204017.htm
    [22]

    WEI M, WANG L, LIU Y S, et al. Homocysteine as a potential predictive factor for high major adverse cardiovascular events risk in female patients with premature acute coronary syndrome[J]. Medicine, 2019, 98(47): e18019. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018019

    [23]

    SUN J Y, HAN W, WU S J, et al. Associations between hyperhomocysteinemia and the presence and severity of acute coronary syndrome in young adults ≤ 35 years of age[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2021, 21(1): 47. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01869-y

    [24] 周茜, 白洁, 张晶. 血清同型半胱氨酸水平与冠心病严重程度关联分析[J]. 公共卫生与预防医学, 2022, 33(03): 146-149. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FBYF202203034.htm
    [25] 高伟杰, 黑耀宗, 王飞. 血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶同型半胱氨酸联合检测对急性脑梗死合并冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者的诊断及病情严重程度判断的临床意义[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2022, 22(01): 13-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWLC202201004.htm
    [26]

    VERDOIA M, ROLLA R, NEGRO F, et al. Homocysteine levels and platelet reactivity in coronary artery disease patients treated with ticagrelor[J]. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 2020, 30(2): 292-299. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2019.09.018

  • 期刊类型引用(2)

    1. 孔令玉,朱天怡. 微小RNA-1180在非小细胞肺癌中的表达及其临床意义. 实用临床医药杂志. 2022(03): 76-80 . 本站查看
    2. 朱洪宇,史志敏. 微小RNA-338-3p调控信号转导和转录激活因子1对表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂耐药肺癌细胞株PC-9/GR中程序性死亡配体1表达和细胞凋亡的影响. 实用临床医药杂志. 2022(04): 100-105 . 本站查看

    其他类型引用(0)

图(1)  /  表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量: 
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 2
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-11-07
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-05-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭