循环肿瘤细胞在食管癌根治性放疗中的临床意义

顾建建

顾建建. 循环肿瘤细胞在食管癌根治性放疗中的临床意义[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(12): 91-95, 101. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20220255
引用本文: 顾建建. 循环肿瘤细胞在食管癌根治性放疗中的临床意义[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(12): 91-95, 101. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20220255
GU Jianjian. Clinical significance of circulating tumor cells in radical radiotherapy for esophageal cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(12): 91-95, 101. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20220255
Citation: GU Jianjian. Clinical significance of circulating tumor cells in radical radiotherapy for esophageal cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(12): 91-95, 101. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20220255

循环肿瘤细胞在食管癌根治性放疗中的临床意义

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: R735.1;Q279

Clinical significance of circulating tumor cells in radical radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

  • 摘要:
    目的 

    探讨食管癌患者循环肿瘤细胞(CTCs)与临床特征及预后的相关性。

    方法 

    选取南通市通州区人民医院2019年8月11日—2021年3月4日收治的114例食管鳞癌患者为研究对象,采用免疫磁珠阴性富集联合免疫荧光原位杂交技术检测CTCs。收集患者临床资料,结合其TNM分期、性别、年龄、肿瘤位置等临床特征进行统计学分析; 比较50例根治性放疗患者在放疗前后的CTCs水平,分析CTCs水平与近期缓解率和无进展生存期(PFS)的关系。

    结果 

    114例食管鳞癌患者CTCs阳性率与年龄、性别、肿瘤位置无相关性(P>0.05), 与肿瘤T分期、N分期、M分期以及临床分期有相关性(P<0.05或P<0.01)。50例患者放疗前的CTCs阳性率为62.00%(31/50), 放疗后的CTCs阳性率为52.00%(26/50), 差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.020, P=0.313)。Kaplan-Meier方法绘制生存曲线的结果显示,放疗前CTCs阴性患者PFS为18.62个月(95%CI: 15.24~21.99), 高于CTCs阳性患者的13.84个月(95%CI: 10.01~17.68), 差异有统计学意义(P=0.048)。放疗后CTCs阴性患者PFS为19.58个月(95%CI: 16.51~22.67), 高于CTCs阳性患者的12.13个月(95%CI: 7.94~16.32), 差异有统计学意义(P=0.003)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,肿瘤临床分期、放疗后CTCs是食管鳞癌患者的独立预后因子(P<0.05)。

    结论 

    CTCs是食管鳞癌患者病情进展评估及放疗后预后评价的重要指标。

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    To explore the correlations of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) with clinical features and prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer.

    Methods 

    A total of 114 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Tongzhou District People's Hospital of Nantong City from August 11, 2019 to March 4, 2021 were selected as research objects, and CTCs were detected by immunomagnetic bead negative enrichment combined with immunofluorescence in situ hybridization. The clinical data of patients were collected and statistically analyzed in combination with clinical features such as TNM staging, gender, age and tumor location; the level of CTCs before and after radiotherapy was compared in 50 patients with radical radiotherapy, and the correlations of CTCs level with short-term remission rate and progression free survival (PFS) were analyzed.

    Results 

    In 114 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, positive rate of CTCs had no correlations with age, gender and tumor location (P > 0.05), but was correlated with T staging, N staging, M staging and clinical stages (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The positive rate of CTCs in 50 patients was 62.00% (31/50) before radiotherapy and 52.00% (26/50) after radiotherapy, and there was no significant difference before and after radiotherapy (χ2=1.020, P=0.313). The survival curve drawn by Kaplan-Meier method showed that the PFS of patients negative for CTCs before radiotherapywas 18.62 months (95%CI, 15.24 to 21.99), which was significantly higher than 13.84 months (95%CI, 10.01 to 17.68) of patients positive for CTCs before radiotherapy(P=0.048). After radiotherapy, the PFS of patients negative for CTCs was 19.58 months (95%CI, 16.51 to 22.67), which was significantly higher than 12.13 months (95%CI, 7.94 to 16.32) of patients positive for CTCs (P=0.003). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that tumor clinical stages and CTCs after radiotherapy were the independent prognostic factors of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (P < 0.05).

    Conclusion 

    CTCs i s an important index in evaluating the progress of disease and prognostic assessment after radiotherapyin patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

  • 图  1   荧光原位杂交技术显示的CTCs(放大倍数400倍)

    A: CD45阴性; B: CEP-8阳性; C: DAPI阳性; D: CTCs合成图。箭头所示为CTCs。

    图  2   放疗前及放疗后CTCs阳性患者与阴性患者的生存曲线比较

    A: 放疗前生存曲线; B: 放疗后生存曲线。

    表  1   114例食管鳞癌患者CTCs与临床病理特征关系

    临床病理特征 分类 n CTCs 阳性率/% χ2 P
    阴性 阳性
    年龄 <60岁 29 15 14 48.28 1.476 0.224
    ≥60岁 85 33 52 61.18
    性别 88 34 54 61.36 1.905 0.168
    26 14 12 46.15
    肿瘤位置 上段 31 17 14 45.16 3.810 0.149
    中段 56 23 33 58.93
    下段 27 8 19 70.37
    T分期 T1 17 12 5 29.41 9.682 0.021
    T2 40 18 22 55.00
    T3 38 14 24 63.16
    T4 19 4 15 78.95
    N分期 N0 42 27 15 35.71 14.153 0.001
    N1 35 12 23 65.71
    N2 37 9 28 75.68
    N3 0 0 0 0
    M分期 M0 104 47 57 54.81 4.635 0.031
    M1 10 1 9 90.00
    临床分期 Ⅰ期 27 21 6 22.22 24.380 0.001
    Ⅱ期 32 15 17 53.13
    Ⅲ期 45 11 34 75.56
    Ⅳ期 10 1 9 90.00
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   50例食管鳞癌患者CTCs与放疗后近期疗效的关系

    时点 CTCs分类 n 疗效评价 RR/% χ2 P
    CR+PR SD
    放疗前 阴性 19 16 3 84.21 4.529 0.033
    阳性 31 17 14 54.84
    放疗后 阴性 24 20 4 83.33 6.179 0.013
    阳性 26 13 13 50.00
    放疗前后变化 放疗前后均为阳性 22 13 9 59.09 11.644 0.009
    放疗前阳性而放疗后阴性 9 8 1 88.89
    放疗前阴性而放疗后阳性 4 0 4 0
    放疗前后均为阴性 15 12 3 80.00
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   食管鳞癌患者放疗后PFS的COX回归分析

    预后因素 回归系数 Wald P OR 95%CI
    下限 上限
    年龄 -0.287 0.112 0.737 0.750 0.140 4.027
    性别 0.286 0.166 0.684 1.331 0.337 5.258
    T分期 -0.368 0.319 0.572 0.692 0.193 2.481
    N分期 -0.184 0.074 0.786 0.832 0.220 3.141
    临床分期 1.674 4.743 0.029 5.334 1.182 24.063
    放疗前CTCs 0.183 0.042 0.838 1.201 0.207 6.966
    放疗后CTCs 2.027 5.274 0.022 7.592 1.346 42.820
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    BRAY F, FERLAY J, SOERJOMATARAM I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA a Cancer JClin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492

    [2]

    ZHANG S W, SUN K X, ZHENG R S, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2015[J]. Journal of the National Cancer Center, 2021, 1(1): 2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2020.12.001

    [3]

    MATSUSHITA D, ARIGAMI T, OKUBO K, et al. The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of a Liquid Biopsy for Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Cancers, 2020, 12(10): 3070. doi: 10.3390/cancers12103070

    [4]

    CASTRO-GINER F, ACETO N. Tracking cancer progression: from circulating tumor cells to metastasis[J]. Genome Med, 2020, 12(1): 31. doi: 10.1186/s13073-020-00728-3

    [5]

    ZHANG P, ZHOU H, LU K, et al. Circulating tumor cells in the clinical cancer diagnosis[J]. ClinTranslOncol, 2020, 22(3): 279-282.

    [6] 中国医师协会放射肿瘤治疗医师分会, 中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会, 中国抗癌协会肿瘤放射治疗专业委员会. 中国食管癌放射治疗指南(2019年版)[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2019, 46(7): 385-398. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-422X.2019.07.001
    [7]

    ARAS M, ERDIL T Y, DANE F, et al. Comparison of WHO, RECIST 1. 1, EORTC, and PERCIST criteria in the evaluation of treatment response in malignant solid tumors[J]. NuclMedCommun, 2016, 37(1): 9-15.

    [8]

    SMYTHEC, LAGERGRENJ, FITZGERALDRC, et al. Oesophagealcancer[J]. The Lancet, 2017, 390(10110): 2383-2396. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31462-9

    [9]

    YE Q W, LING S B, ZHENG S S, et al. Liquid biopsy in hepatocellular carcinoma: circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA[J]. Mol Cancer, 2019, 18(1): 114. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1043-x

    [10]

    BOYA M, CHUCH, LIU R X, et al. Circulating Tumor Cell Enrichment Technologies[J]. TumorLiqBiopsies, 2020, 215: 25-55.

    [11]

    MATSUSHITA D, UENOSONO Y, ARIGAMI T, et al. Clinical significance of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2015, 22(11): 3674-3680. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4392-8

    [12]

    LI SP, GUAN QL, ZHAO D, et al. Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells by Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Potential Clinical Applications[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2016, 22: 1654-1662. doi: 10.12659/MSM.898335

    [13]

    QIAO Y, LI J, SHI C, et al. Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2017, 10: 1363-1373. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S129004

    [14]

    OZPISKIN O M, ZHANG L, LIJJ. Immune targets in the tumor microenvironment treated by radiotherapy[J]. Theranostics, 2019, 9(5): 1215-1231. doi: 10.7150/thno.32648

    [15]

    ASHRAFIZADEH M, FARHOOD B, ELEOJO MUSA A, et al. Abscopal effect in radioimmunotherapy[J]. IntImmunopharmacol, 2020, 85: 106663.

    [16]

    LIANG D H, HALL C, ANTHONY L. Circulating Tumor Cells in Breast Cancer[J]. Recent Results Cancer Res, 2020, 215: 127-145.

    [17]

    MALY V, MALY O, KOLOSTOVA K, et al. Circulating Tumor Cells in Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Cancer[J]. In Vivo, 2019, 33(4): 11571.

    [18]

    PHUNGTH, SANJEEVG, NGUYENTB, et al. Emerging Role of Circulating Tumor Cells in Gastric Cancer[J]. Cancers, 2020, 12(3), 695. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030695

    [19]

    WOESTEMEIER A, HARMS-EFFENBERGER K, KARSTENS K F, et al. Clinical Relevance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Esophageal Cancer Detected by a Combined MACS Enrichment Method[J]. Cancers, 2020, 12(3): 718. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030718

  • 期刊类型引用(1)

    1. 张向前,兰堃田,李伟明. 外周血循环肿瘤细胞动态变化与晚期食管癌化疗患者预后的关系. 医药论坛杂志. 2024(21): 2261-2265 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(2)

图(2)  /  表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  131
  • HTML全文浏览量:  50
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 3
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-01-17
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-06-21

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭

    根据国家关于期刊质量管理的相关要求,为加强学术诚信体系建设,防范学术不端风险,《实用临床医药杂志》要求文章重复率不超过20%。即日起,请作者在向《实用临床医药杂志》投稿前先通过维普、万方等权威数据库进行论文查重检测。作者通过投审稿系统投稿时,需要提交稿件及本文重复率不超过20%的查重检测报告。

    鉴于作者在外部渠道查重易造成论文与成果泄漏,《实用临床医药杂志》官网联系了维普论文检测系统(链接地址:https://vpcs.fanyu.com/personal/jcmp)、万方检测系统(链接地址:http://jcmp.wfcheck.cn/),便于作者进行预查重检测。维普论文检测系统、万方检测系统为第三方检测,具体事宜请作者与检测方接洽(维普联系电话:400-607-5550;万方联系QQ:800856851;电话:18677087062)。

    同时,《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部提醒广大作者尽早关注“实用临床医药杂志”官方微信公众号,并登陆官方网站及投审稿系统进行投稿。

     


    《实用临床医药杂志》官方微信二维码

     

     

    《实用临床医药杂志》官方网站三维码