多功能意识障碍促醒仪对神经外科昏迷患者的促醒作用

桂冬梅; 杜邱; 许静鸣; 裴培; 段晓春

doi:10.7619/jcmp.20220285

多功能意识障碍促醒仪对神经外科昏迷患者的促醒作用

扬州大学附属医院神经外科, 江苏扬州, 225000

基金项目:

江苏省自然科学基金青年基金项目 BK20200936

详细信息

通讯作者:
段晓春, E-mail: doctor_duan@163.com

中图分类号: R741;R49
计量
- 文章访问数: 0158
- HTML全文浏览量: 046
- PDF下载量: 035
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-01-19
- 网络出版日期: 2022-06-21

Effect of multifunctional consciousness disorder wake-up apparatus on promoting of wake-up in comatose patients in neurosurgery department

Department of Neurosurgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225000

摘要

摘要:
目的
探讨多功能意识障碍促醒仪对神经外科昏迷患者的促醒作用。
方法
将扬州大学附属医院神经外科病房收治的昏迷患者72例随机分为干预组和对照组，每组36例。对照组给予常规治疗，干预组在对照组基础上使用昏迷多功能意识障碍促醒仪进行治疗，每天共刺激8 h, 每小时刺激20 min后休息40 min。治疗后1、2周，比较2组格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分和国际昏迷恢复量表-修改版(CRS-R)评分。
结果
干预组患者治疗后1、2周GCS评分为(7.89±3.81)、(10.29±1.45)分，分别高于对照组的(6.46±2.67)、(8.41±2.59)分，差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05); 干预组患者治疗后1、2周CRS-R评分为(9.50±1.61)、(11.7±1.20)分，分别高于对照组的(8.56±1.67)、(9.11±1.59)分，差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
结论
多功能意识障碍促醒仪对于生命体征平稳的神经外科昏迷患者早期意识障碍有一定改善作用，可明显缩短昏迷时间，有利于昏迷患者的促醒。
- 昏迷 /
- 促醒治疗 /
- 神经外科 /
- 治疗仪 /
- 格拉斯哥昏迷量表 /
- 国际昏迷恢复量表-修改版
Abstract:
Objective
To investigate effect of multifunctional consciousness disorder wake-up apparatus on promoting of wake-up in comatose patients in neurosurgery department.
Methods
A total of 72 coma patients admitted to neurosurgery ward of the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University were selected and randomly divided into intervention group and control group, with 36 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were given conventional treatment, those in the intervention group used multifunctional consciousness disorder wake-up apparatus on this basis of the intervention group, and were stimulated for 8 hours of treatment every day, they were given 20 minutes of stimulation every hour and 40 minutes of rest. The scores of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) were compared between the two groups at 1 week and 2 weeks after the intervention.
Results
The GCS score of the intervention group was (7.89±3.81) at 1 week after treatment, and (10.29±1.45) at 2 weeks after treatment, which were higher than (6.46±2.67) and (8.41±2.59) of the control group (P < 0.05). The CRS-R score of the intervention group was (9.50±1.61) after 1 week of treatment, and was (11.7±1.20) in the intervention group after two weeks of treatment, which were higher than (8.56±1.67) and (9.11±1.59) of the control group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
The multifunctional consciousness disorder wake-up apparatus can improve the early unconsciousness in neurosurgical coma patients with stable vital signs, significantly shorten the time of coma, and is beneficial to the promotion of revival of comatose patients.
- coma /
- wake-up therapy /
- neurosurgery department /
- therapeutic apparatus /
- Glasgow Coma Scale /
- Coma Recovery Scale-Revised

HTML全文

表 1 2组治疗前后GCS评分比较(x±s) 分

组别	治疗前	治疗后1周	治疗后2周
干预组	6.00±1.19	7.89±3.81^*#	10.29±1.45^*#
对照组	6.00±1.49	6.46±2.67^*	8.41±2.59^*
与治疗前比较, * P < 0.05; 与对照组比较, #P < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组治疗前后CRS-R评分比较(x±s) 分

组别	治疗前	治疗后1周	治疗后2周
干预组	8.46±1.29	9.50±1.61^*#	11.70±1.20^*#
对照组	8.50±1.61	8.56±1.67^*	9.11±1.59^*
与治疗前比较, * P < 0.05; 与对照组比较, #P < 0.05。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(14)

[1]	中华医学会神经外科学分会, 中国神经外科重症管理协作组. 中国重型颅脑创伤早期康复管理专家共识(2017)[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2017, 97(21): 1615-1623. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.21.006
[2]	宋鲁平, 王强, 张通. 从康复医学看颅脑创伤早期康复的重要性[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2017, 97(21): 1604-1604. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.21.003
[3]	倪莹莹, 王首红, 宋为群, 等. 神经重症康复中国专家共识(中)[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2018, 33(2): 130-136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2018.02.002
[4]	石艳红, 邵秀芹, 冯珍, 等. 正中神经电刺激对脑外伤后昏迷促醒治疗的参数研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(2): 207-210. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.02.018
[5]	马超. 神经调控在昏迷患者促醒中的研究进展[J]. 中山大学学报: 医学科学版, 2021, 42(4): 487-493 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSYK202104003.htm
[6]	PRODUTURI G R, KURTZ J S, BROWN N J, et al. The minimally conscious state: an analysis of current clinical trials registered in clinical trials[J]. Gov Ann Palliat Med, 2022. [Published online ahead of print].
[7]	FELLER D, VINANTE C, TRENTIN F, et al. The effectiveness of median nerve electrical stimulation in patients with disorders of consciousness: a systematic review[J]. Brain Inj, 2021, 35(4): 385-394.
[8]	肌电生物反馈治疗脑卒中后病人上肢运动功能障碍效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理研究, 2021, 35(10): 1697-1710.
[9]	秦晓云, 张占普, 窦长武, 等. 动态脑电图监测评估神经外科昏迷患者预后的临床价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2017, 21(1): 109-110. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201701033
[10]	荆静, 马艳平, 刘万林, 等. 正中神经电刺激治疗脑卒中后认知障碍的康复疗效及机制探讨[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2020, 42(3): 215-220.
[11]	陈祢, 王俭, 王宝兰, 等. 右侧正中神经电刺激促醒疗法对健康人脑功能影响的fMRI研究[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2019, 41(2): 91-95.
[12]	刘梦洋, 杨俊生, 梁矗, 等. 正中神经电刺激用于昏迷促醒的研究进展[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘: 连续型电子期刊, 2020, 20(96): 44-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKF201705023.htm
[13]	STEFANO M, CORDELLA F, GUGLIELMELLI E, et al. Intraneural electrical stimulation of median nerve: a simulation study on sensory and motor fascicles[J]. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents, 2020, 34(5 Suppl. 3): 127-136.
[14]	STEFANO M, CORDELLA F, LOPPINI A, et al. A Multiscale Approach to Axon and Nerve Stimulation Modeling: A Review[J]. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2021, 29: 397-407.