左心耳封堵术联合经皮冠状动脉介入术“一站式”手术的有效性及安全性

Effectiveness and safety of “one-stop” surgery of left atrial appendage closure and percutaneous coronary intervention

  • 摘要:
    目的 评估冠心病(CAD)合并心房颤动(AF)患者行左心耳封堵术(LAAC)联合经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)的有效性及安全性。
    方法 回顾性选取接受LAAC联合PCI“一站式”手术的10例CAD合并AF患者作为研究对象, 记录患者的基线资料、围术期治疗情况、严重并发症发生情况和术后抗栓方案,比较患者术前和术后1个月、1年时的超声心动图相关参数和加拿大心血管学会(CCS)心绞痛分级。术后开展电话随访或门诊随访,记录患者用药情况、生存情况和血栓栓塞、大出血事件发生情况。
    结果 10例患者房颤脑卒中风险评分(CHA2DS2-VASc评分)为(4.8±1.1)分,出血风险评分(HAS-BLED评分)为(3.8±1.0)分; 左心耳开口直径为(24.6±4.3) mm, 左心耳锚定区直径为(22.8±2.8) mm, 左心耳深度为(32.2±4.4) mm。10例患者术中均成功置入Lambre封堵器,并对病变血管进行支架植入,围术期均未发生血栓栓塞、出血等严重并发症。10例患者平均随访(18.7±3.9)个月,均存活,未发生心肌梗死、缺血性卒中、出血性卒中、血栓栓塞事件,1例患者发生大出血事件, 2例患者发生小出血事件。术后1个月时,患者左心房内径、左心室射血分数、肺动脉压力和二尖瓣反流、三尖瓣反流、主动脉瓣反流情况与术前比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 术后1个月时,患者CCS心绞痛分级与术前比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。术后1年时,患者左心房内径、肺动脉压力和二尖瓣反流、三尖瓣反流、主动脉瓣反流情况与术前比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 术后1年时,患者左心室射血分数、心绞痛CCS分级与术前比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论 LAAC(Lambre封堵器)联合PCI“一站式”手术应用于CAD合并AF患者中安全、可行且有效。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) combined with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary heart disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF).
    Methods A retrospective study was performed in 10 patients with CAD and AF who underwent "one-stop procedure" of LAAC combined with PCI. Baseline data, perioperativetreatment, occurrence of serious complications and postoperative antithrombotic regiments were recorded. Echocardiographic parameters and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina classification were compared before operation and at 1 month and 1 year after operation. Routine postoperative telephone or outpatient follow-up was performed, and the medications, thromboembolism, major bleeding events, and survival of patients were recorded.
    Results The atrial fibrillation stroke risk score (CHA2DS2-VASc score) and bleeding risk score were (4.8±1.1) and (3.8±1.0); the diameter of left atrial appendage opening was (24.6±4.3) mm, the diameter of left atrial appendage anchoring area was (22.8±2.8) mm, and the depth of left atrial appendage was (32.2±4.4) mm. Lambre devices were successfully placed in all 10 patients, and stent implantation was performed in the diseased culprit vessel. No patient had severe complications such as thromboembolism or bleeding during the perioperative period. During follow-up of (18.7±3.9) months, all patients survived, no patient had myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, or thromboembolic events. One patient had massive bleeding and 2 patients had minor bleeding. There were no significant differences in left atrial internal diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary artery pressure, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, and aortic regurgitation of patients 1 month after operation compared with pre-operation (P>0.05). At 1 month after operation, the CCS angina grade showed a significant difference compared with that before operation (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in left atrial internal diameter, pulmonary artery pressure, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, and aortic regurgitation of patients 1 year after operation compared with pre-operation (P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in left ventricular ejection fraction and angina pectoris CCS classification of patients 1 year after operation compared with pre-operation(P < 0.05).
    Conclusion The "one-stop" procedure of LAAC (Lambre closure) combined with PCI in patients with CAD and AF is feasible, safe, and effective.

     

/

返回文章
返回