Value of color Doppler ultrasound, ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology combined with BRAFV600E gene detection in diagnosis of microthyroid nodules
-
摘要:目的
探讨彩色多普勒超声检查、超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学检查(US-FNAC)联合BRAFV600E基因检测对微小甲状腺结节的诊断价值。
方法选取中高风险微小甲状腺结节患者103例为研究对象。患者行甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)分级, 术前均行彩色多普勒超声检查、US-FNAC及丝氨酸/苏氨酸特异性激酶突变基因V600E(BRAFV600E)检测。术后根据病理结果计算并比较单独检测和三者联合检测的敏感性、特异性和准确性，分析诊断效能。
结果超声检查显示，不同性质结节的纵横比、结构、回声、钙化及边缘情况比较，差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。良性结节和恶性结节垂直位、低回声、点状强回声或微钙化及边缘不规则生长的诊断结果比较，差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。103例研究对象中, US-FNAC检查诊断为Ⅴ、Ⅵ级的患者63例(共98个结节，其中67个恶性)，占比61.2%; Ⅲ、Ⅳ级的患者26例(共32个结节，其中14个恶性)，占比25.2%; Ⅱ级的12例(共12个结节，无恶性)，占比11.7%; Ⅰ级的2例(共2个结节，其中1个恶性)，占比1.9%。BRAFV600E基因检测有72例发生突变(共111个结节, 其中76个恶性)，占比69.9%; 无突变患者31例(共33个结节，其中6个恶性)，占比30.1%。超声检查、US-FNAC检查、BRAFV600E基因检测的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为75.3%、62.5%、73.0%, 79.5%、68.8%、77.5%与93.2%、68.8%、88.8%; 三者联合诊断的敏感性、特异性和准确性均最高，分别为97.3%、75.0%、93.3%。联合诊断的敏感性、特异性和准确性高于单独检测，差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
结论联合检测可提高对甲状腺乳头状微小癌的检出率，有助于微小结节精准的术前评估。
-
关键词:
- 彩色多普勒超声 /
- 细针穿刺细胞学检查 /
- BRAFV600E基因突变 /
- 甲状腺乳头状微小癌 /
- 诊断
Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnostic value of color Doppler ultrasound, ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (US-FNAC) combined with BRAFV600E gene detection in small thyroid nodules.
MethodsA total of 103 patients with moderate or high risk small thyroid nodules were selected as study subjects. The Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) grading, preoperative color doppler ultrasound US-FNAC and silk/threonine specific kinase mutant gene V600E (BRAFV600E) detection were performed. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each examination alone and their combination were compared according to the pathological results, and the diagnostic performance was analyzed.
ResultsThe ultrasound examination showed that there were statistically significant differences in aspect ratio, structure, echo, echoes, calcification and marginal growth of nodules of different nature (P < 0.05). Of the 103 subjects, 63 cases (98 nodules with 67 malignant ones) were diagnosed as grade V or VI by US-FNAC examination, accounting for 61.2%. There were 26 patients with grade Ⅲ and Ⅳ (32 nodules with 14 malignant ones), accounting for 25.2%. There were 12 cases of grade Ⅱ (12 nodules in total without malignancy), accounting for 11.7%; there were 2 cases of grade Ⅰ (2 nodules with one malignant nodule), accounting for 1.9%. BRAFV600E gene examination showed that 72 cases (111 nodules, 76 of which were malignant) was detected, accounting for 69.9%. There were 31 patients without mutation (33 nodules in total, 6 of which were malignant), accounting for 30.1%. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ultrasound examination, US-FNAC examination and BRAFV600E gene test were 75.3%, 62.5%, 73.0%, respectively, 79.5%, 68.8%, 77.5%, respectively and 93.2%, 68.8%, 88.8%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of their combined diagnosis were the highest, which were 97.3%, 75.0% and 93.3%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of their combined diagnosis were higher than those of single detection (P < 0.05).
ConclusionCombined detection can improve the detection rate of thyroid papillary microcarcinoma, which is conducive to accurate preoperative evaluation of small nodules.
-
-
表 1 US影像学特征结果比较
个 US影像学特征 分类 良性结节(n=47) 恶性结节(n=82) P 纵横比 垂直位 2 73 ＜0.001 水平位 45 9 结构 实性或实性为主 43 82 0.031 囊性为主 4 0 回声 低回声或极低回声 10 76 ＜0.001 高回声或等回声 37 6 钙化 点状强回声或微钙化 6 70 ＜0.001 无钙化 41 12 边缘 不规则生长 3 68 ＜0.001 规则生长 44 14 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 US-FNAC和BRAFV600E基因检测结果
例 BRAFV600E基因检测 US-FNAC检测结果 Ⅰ级 Ⅱ级 Ⅲ级 Ⅳ级 Ⅴ级 Ⅵ级 合计 基因突变 1 0 9 1 47 14 72 无突变 1 12 11 5 2 0 31 合计 2 12 20 6 49 14 103
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 各种检查的诊断性能
检查方法 结果 手术病理结果/例 敏感性/% 特异性/% 准确性/% 阳性(n=73) 阴性(n=16) 合计 US 阳性 55 6 61 75.3 62.5 73.0 阴性 18 10 28 US-FNAC 阳性 58 5 63 79.5 68.8 77.5 阴性 15 11 26 BRAFV600E基因检测 阳性 68 5 73 93.2 68.8 88.8 阴性 5 11 16 三者联合检测 阳性 71 4 75 97.3 75.0 93.3 阴性 2 12 14
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 中华医学会内分泌学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会, 中国抗癌协会头颈肿瘤专业委员会, 等. 甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌诊治指南[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2012, 28(10): 779-797. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6699.2012.10.002 [2] DURANTE C, GRANI G, LAMARTINA L, et al. The diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules: a review[J]. JAMA, 2018, 319(9): 914-924. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0898
[3] HAUGEN B R, ALEXANDER E K, BIBLE K C, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. Thyroid, 2016, 26(1): 1-133. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0020
[4] 陈立斌, 张盛敏, 许幼峰, 等. 超声引导下甲状腺细针抽吸术诊断甲状腺结节的价值以及结节大小对Bethesda分类结果的影响研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2018, 21(20): 2511-2515. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.177 [5] UPADHYAYA P, DHAKAL S, ADHIKARI P, et al. Histopathological review of diagnostic categories of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology-an institutional experience of 5 years[J]. J Cytol, 2019, 36(1): 48-52. doi: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_64_18
[6] 张玲, 周晓燕, 陈颖, 等. 甲状腺结节穿刺标本中BRAF V600E突变检测的临床意义[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2019, 29(3): 178-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGAZ201903006.htm [7] CIBAS E S, ALI S Z. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology[J]. Thyroid, 2009, 19(11): 1159-1165. doi: 10.1089/thy.2009.0274
[8] 单忠艳. 长期全民食盐加碘的有效性和安全性: 中国大陆31省流行病学证据[J]. 国际内分泌代谢杂志, 2020, 40(5): 314. [9] 陆志峰, 冯尚勇, 顾学文, 等. 359例甲状腺癌患者临床特点及颈部淋巴结转移的相关因素[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2018, 22(21): 61-64. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201821019 [10] 周科, 潘俊峰, 龙斌斌, 等. 中央淋巴结清扫术治疗分化型甲状腺癌的临床疗效及预后分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2018, 22(3): 63-65. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201803017 [11] 中国医师协会外科医师分会甲状腺外科医师委员会, 中国研究型医院学会甲状腺疾病专业委员会, 中国医学装备协会外科装备分会甲状腺外科装备委员会. 超声引导下甲状腺结节细针穿刺活检专家共识及操作指南(2018版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(3): 241-244. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGWK201803001.htm [12] 王旭东. 甲状腺微小乳头状癌高侵袭性的解读[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(6): 486-492. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WKLL202106008.htm [13] AL-SALAM S, SHARMA C, ABU SA'A M T, et al. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology and ultrasound examination of thyroid nodules in the UAE: a comparison[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(4): e0247807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247807
[14] 中国临床肿瘤学会指南工作委员会, 黄慧强, 林岩松, 等. 中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO)分化型甲状腺癌诊疗指南2021[J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗, 2021, 34(12): 1164-1201. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0904.2021.12.013 [15] 肖迎聪, 熊鹏, 陈志国, 等. 甲状腺结节超声风险分层联合BRAFV600E基因诊断在甲状腺乳头状癌患者中的应用[J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2019, 36(9): 1415-1418. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXYD201909007.htm [16] JIN M, SONG D E, AHN J, et al. Genetic profiles of aggressive variants of papillary thyroid carcinomas[J]. Cancers: Basel, 2021, 13(4): 892.
[17] 杨雅静, 汪耘吉, 冯尚勇. 分子检测在甲状腺结节诊断中的研究进展[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(2): 112-116, 121. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20201005 [18] 陈家伦. 临床内分泌学[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2011: 112-115. [19] 中国抗癌协会甲状腺癌专业委员会(CATO). 甲状腺微小乳头状癌诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2016版)[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2016, 43(10): 405-411. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZL201610001.htm [20] TESSLER F N, MIDDLETON W D, GRANT E G, et al. ACR thyroid imaging, reporting and data system (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS committee[J]. J Am Coll Radiol, 2017, 14(5): 587-595.
[21] 李若暄, 慈霞, 王菲, 等. 超声引导下FNAC联合BRAF V600E基因突变检测诊断甲状腺乳头状癌及评估病情的研究进展[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2019, 21(5): 366-368. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCCY201905017.htm -
期刊类型引用(10)
1. 廖倩. 5A护理模式在激素冲击治疗胸腰椎骨折伴脊髓损伤患者中的应用效果. 中国药物经济学. 2024(S1): 188-189+192 . 
百度学术
2. 杨莹娟，刘晓曦，刘春枝. 5A护理模式在激素冲击治疗胸腰椎骨折伴脊髓损伤患者期间的应用效果. 中国药物滥用防治杂志. 2023(02): 352-355 . 百度学术
3. 孙常磊. ACTED康复模式在下肢骨折患者术后肢体康复护理中的应用. 国际护理学杂志. 2023(15): 2812-2815 . 百度学术
4. 阳凡，何曦，方清，陈霞. 基于循证理念的血栓防治小组对骨折术后卧床患者深静脉血栓发生率的影响. 临床医药实践. 2023(10): 782-785 . 百度学术
5. 顾光丽，胡丽华，张菱，孙丽华. 椎体压缩性骨折患者行经皮椎体成型术后的疗效及心理护理. 吉林医学. 2022(07): 1995-1997 . 百度学术
6. 刘俊梅. 经皮椎体成形术治疗脊椎压缩性骨折围术期护理体会. 基层医学论坛. 2022(27): 42-44 . 百度学术
7. 周宣业，孙苏亭，高峰. 股骨颈骨折患者围手术期深静脉血栓发生现状及危险因素分析. 临床医学研究与实践. 2022(30): 20-23+36 . 百度学术
8. 叶钱琳. 早期康复护理结合多元化健康教育对老年胸腰椎压缩性骨折手术患者自护能力、康复效果的影响. 名医. 2022(23): 129-131 . 百度学术
9. 谢瑶，侯慧芳. 预见性护理结合预警评分预防骨折患者静脉血栓栓塞症发生的效果. 临床医学研究与实践. 2021(13): 156-158 . 百度学术
10. 卢慧简，麦华玉. “5A”护理预防长期卧床呼吸衰竭患者DVT发生的效果. 中国卫生标准管理. 2021(12): 143-146 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(0)
计量
- 文章访问数: 196
- HTML全文浏览量: 49
- PDF下载量: 12
- 被引次数: 10
苏公网安备 32100302010246号
