阿加曲班联合抗血小板治疗急性轻中度大动脉粥样硬化型脑梗死的效果及安全性分析

Safety and efficacy of argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy for acute mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke with large artery atherosclerosis

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨阿加曲班联合抗血小板治疗对症状发作后72 h内急性轻中度大动脉粥样硬化型脑梗死患者的效果和安全性。
    方法 选取452例大动脉粥样硬化型脑梗死患者作为研究对象,并将其分为2组。联合治疗组(n=286)接受阿加曲班联合抗血小板治疗,对照组(n=141)仅接受抗血小板治疗。采用Logistic回归模型比较2组患者抗栓治疗后美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分、早期神经功能恶化(END)及出血的差异。
    结果 2组患者年龄、吸烟史、卒中发病到入院时间以及低密度脂蛋白、估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)水平比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。联合治疗组和对照组梗死部位、责任动脉和大动脉粥样硬化亚型比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。大动脉粥样硬化型脑梗死患者中,经阿加曲班联合治疗后90 d时的mRS评分(0~2分)患者占比为85.3%, 对照组为74.5%, 差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在NIHSS评分≥3分患者中,联合治疗组90 d时mRS评分为0~2分的患者占比为19.3%, 而对照组为60.8%, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。前循环责任动脉中,阿加曲班联合治疗组90 d时mRS评分为0~2分的患者占比为82.1%, 对照组为67.2%, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在大动脉粥样硬化亚型中,联合治疗组90 d时mRS评分为0~2分的穿支闭塞患者占比较对照组更高,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论 阿加曲班联合抗血小板治疗可以改善急性轻中度大动脉粥样硬化型缺血性脑卒中患者的神经功能结局,且不会增大出血风险。联合治疗在前循环缺血和穿支动脉闭塞患者中获益更明显。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the effectiveness and safety of argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute mild-to-moderate atherosclerotic cerebral infarction within 72 hours after symptom onset.
    Methods A total of 452 patients with large atherosclerotic cerebral infarction were enrolled and divided into two groups. The combined therapy group (n=286) received argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy, while the control group (n=166) received antiplatelet therapy alone. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, early neurological deterioration (END), and occurrence of bleeding events were compared between the two groups using a Logistic regression model.
    Results Statistically significant differences were observed in age, smoking history, time from stroke onset to admission, low-density lipoprotein, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels between the two groups (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in infarction location, responsible artery, and atherosclerotic subtype between the combined therapy and control groups (P>0.05). Among patients with atheroscleroticcerebral infarction, the proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0 to 2 at 90 days after combined therapy of argatrobanwas 85.3%, and was 74.5% in the control group (P < 0.05). In patients with an NIHSS score ≥3, the proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0 to 2 at 90 days in the combined therapy group was 19.3%, which was significantly lower than 60.8% in the control group (P < 0.05). For anterior circulation responsible artery occlusion, the proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0 to 2 at 90 days in the combined therapy group was 82.1%, and 67.2% in the control group (P < 0.05). Among atherosclerotic subtypes, the proportion of patients with penetrating artery occlusion and an mRS score of 0 to 2 at 90 days was significantly higher in the combined therapy group compared to the control group (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion Argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy can improve neurological outcomes in patients with acute mild-to-moderate atherosclerotic ischemic stroke without increasing the risk of bleeding. The combined therapy offers more pronounced benefits in patients with anterior circulation ischemia and penetrating artery occlusion.

     

/

返回文章
返回