沉默信息调节因子2相关酶1和集落刺激因子1受体表达与结肠癌患者临床特征和预后的关系

徐鑫龙, 李桓, 马凯旋

徐鑫龙, 李桓, 马凯旋. 沉默信息调节因子2相关酶1和集落刺激因子1受体表达与结肠癌患者临床特征和预后的关系[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(23): 70-74. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242568
引用本文: 徐鑫龙, 李桓, 马凯旋. 沉默信息调节因子2相关酶1和集落刺激因子1受体表达与结肠癌患者临床特征和预后的关系[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(23): 70-74. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242568
XU Xinlong, LI Huan, MA Kaixuan. Correlations of the expression of silencing information regulatory factor 2-related enzyme-1 and colony-stimulating factor 1 receptors with clinical features and prognosis in patients with colon cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(23): 70-74. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242568
Citation: XU Xinlong, LI Huan, MA Kaixuan. Correlations of the expression of silencing information regulatory factor 2-related enzyme-1 and colony-stimulating factor 1 receptors with clinical features and prognosis in patients with colon cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(23): 70-74. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242568

沉默信息调节因子2相关酶1和集落刺激因子1受体表达与结肠癌患者临床特征和预后的关系

基金项目: 

河北省保定市科技计划项目 2041ZF155

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: R735.3;R730.2;R394.3

Correlations of the expression of silencing information regulatory factor 2-related enzyme-1 and colony-stimulating factor 1 receptors with clinical features and prognosis in patients with colon cancer

  • 摘要:
    目的 

    探讨沉默信息调节因子2相关酶1(SIRT1)和集落刺激因子1受体(CSF1R)表达与结肠癌患者临床特征及预后的关系。

    方法 

    收集148例结肠癌患者术中切除的结肠癌组织标本及癌旁组织标本。分析结肠癌患者的临床病理特征。采用免疫组织化学法检测SIRT1和CSF1R的表达; 采用Spearman相关分析法分析SIRT1与CSF1R的相关性; 采用Kaplan-Meier法分析SIRT1、CSF1R表达与患者预后的关系; 采用多因素Cox回归分析法分析结肠癌患者预后的影响因素。

    结果 

    与癌旁组织相比,结肠癌组织中SIRT1蛋白表达降低, CSF1R蛋白表达升高,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。SIRT1与CSF1R蛋白表达与结肠癌患者的淋巴结转移、神经侵袭、浸润深度情况相关(P < 0.05)。SIRT1与CSF1R蛋白表达呈负相关(r=-0.536, P < 0.05)。SIRT1高表达结肠癌患者3年生存率高于SIRT1低表达患者,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。CSF1R高表达结肠癌患者3年生存率低于CSF1R低表达患者,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。淋巴结转移、浸润深度、神经侵袭、SIRT1、CSF1R是结肠癌患者预后的影响因素(P < 0.05)。

    结论 

    结肠癌患者癌组织中SIRT1表达显著下调, CSF1R表达显著上调,且与患者淋巴结转移、神经侵袭、浸润深度等临床病理特征密切相关,检测其水平对预测患者预后生存情况具有重要价值。

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    To investigate the correlations of the expression of silent information regulator 2 homolog 1 (SIRT1) and colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) with the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with colon cancer.

    Methods 

    Colon cancer tissue specimens and paracancer tissue specimens were collected from 148 patients with colon cancer. The clinical and pathological features of the patients were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of SIRT1 and CSF1R; the Spearman's correlation analysis was employed to assess the correlation between SIRT1 and CSF1R; the Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to evaluate the associations of the expression of SIRT1 and CSF1R with patients' prognosis; the multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors in colon cancer patients.

    Results 

    Compared with the adjacent tissues, the expression of SIRT1 protein in colon cancer tissues was significantly decreased, and the expression of CSF1R protein was significantly increased (P < 0.05). The expressions of SIRT1 and CSF1R protein were correlated with lymph node metastasis, nerve invasion and invasion depth in patients with colon cancer (P < 0.05). The protein expressions of SIRT1 and CSF1R were negatively correlated (r=-0.536, P < 0.05). The 3-year survival rate of patients with high SIRT1 expression was significantly higher than that of patients with low SIRT1 expression (P < 0.05). The 3-year survival rate of patients with high CSF1R expression was significantly lower than that of patients with low CSF1R expression (P < 0.05). The 3-year survival rate of patients with high SIRT1 expression was significantly higher than that of patients with low SIRT1 expression (P < 0.05).

    Conclusion 

    In colon cancer, SIRT1 expression is significantly downregulated, whereas CSF1R expression is upregulated, and both are closely related to the clinical and pathological features such as lymph node metastasis, neural invasion, and tumor infiltration depth. Detection of these biomarkers may have important value in predicting patients' prognosis and survival.

  • 图  1   SIRT1、CSF1R蛋白在结肠癌组织和癌旁组织中的表达(比例尺100 μm)

    A: SIRT1蛋白在癌旁组织中表达; B: SIRT1蛋白在结肠癌组织中表达; C: CSF1R蛋白在癌旁组织中表达; D: CSF1R蛋白在结肠癌组织中表达。

    图  2   SIRT1表达与生存率的关系

    图  3   CSF1R表达与生存率的关系

    表  1   SIRT1和CSF1R蛋白在结肠癌组织和癌旁组织中的表达情况[n(%)]

    组织类型 n SIRT1 CSF1R
    高表达 低表达 高表达 低表达
    癌旁组织 148 99(66.89) 49(33.11) 53(35.81) 95(64.19)
    结肠癌组织 148 43(29.05)* 105(70.95)* 112(75.68)* 36(24.32)*
    与癌旁组织相比, * P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   SIRT1和CSF1R蛋白与临床病理特征的关系[n(%)]

    临床病理特征 分类 n SIRT1低表达(n=105) SIRT1高表达(n=43) χ2 P CSF1R低表达(n=36) CSF1R高表达(n=112) χ2 P
    年龄 < 60岁 52 39(37.14) 13(80.23) 0.639 0.424 16(44.44) 36(32.14) 1.809 0.179
    ≥60岁 96 66(62.86) 30(69.77) 20(55.56) 76(67.86)
    性别 81 56(53.33) 25(58.14) 0.284 0.594 23(63.89) 58(51.79) 1.611 0.204
    67 49(46.67) 18(41.86) 13(36.11) 54(48.21)
    肿瘤直径 < 5 cm 69 45(42.86) 24(55.81) 2.058 0.151 19(52.78) 50(44.64) 0.714 0.395
    ≥5 cm 79 60(57.14) 19(44.17) 17(47.22) 62(55.36)
    TNM分期 Ⅰ~Ⅱ期 85 55(52.38) 30(69.77) 3.772 0.052 25(69.44) 60(53.57) 2.808 0.094
    Ⅲ~Ⅳ期 63 50(47.62) 13(30.23) 11(30.56) 52(46.43)
    淋巴结转移 91 57(54.29) 34(79.07) 7.913 0.005 29(80.56) 62(55.36) 7.305 0.007
    57 48(45.71) 9(20.93) 7(19.44) 50(44.64)
    神经侵袭 43 38(36.19) 5(11.63) 8.929 0.003 4(11.11) 39(34.82) 7.430 0.006
    105 67(63.81) 38(88.37) 32(88.89) 73(65.18)
    浸润深度 T1~T2 77 45(42.86) 32(74.42) 12.175 < 0.001 8(22.22) 69(61.61) 16.931 < 0.001
    T3~T4 71 60(57.14) 11(25.58) 28(77.78) 43(38.39)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   SIRT1和CSF1R蛋白在结肠癌组织中的相关性

    SIRT1 CSF1R r P
    高表达(n=112) 低表达(n=36)
    高表达(n=43) 23 20 -0.536 < 0.001
    低表达(n=105) 89 16
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   结肠癌患者预后的影响因素

    因素 B SE Wald P HR 95%CI
    SIRT1 -0.304 0.096 10.015 0.002 0.738 0.614~0.891
    CSF1R 1.267 0.412 9.452 0.002 3.549 1.583~7.958
    淋巴结转移 0.922 0.364 6.420 0.011 2.515 1.232~5.133
    神经侵袭 1.619 0.223 7.704 0.006 1.857 1.199~2.875
    浸润深度 0.755 0.296 6.509 0.011 2.128 1.191~3.801
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    RUAN H, LEIBOWITZ B J, ZHANG L, et al. Immunogenic cell death in colon cancer prevention and therapy[J]. Mol Carcinog, 2020, 59(7): 783-793. doi: 10.1002/mc.23183

    [2] 齐荣暄, 刘格良, 穆俊芳, 等. 结肠癌免疫相关基因筛选和预后模型建立[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(14): 63-71, 77. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20231576
    [3]

    WEN J, MIN X J, SHEN M Q, et al. ACLY facilitates colon cancer cell metastasis by CTNNB1[J]. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2019, 38(1): 401. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1391-9

    [4]

    GUPTA R, BHATT L K, JOHNSTON T P, et al. Colon cancer stem cells: potential target for the treatment of colorectal cancer[J]. Cancer Biol Ther, 2019, 20(8): 1068-1082. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2019.1599660

    [5]

    ALVES-FERNANDES D K, JASIULIONIS M G. The role of SIRT1 on DNA damage response and epigenetic alterations in cancer[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(13): 3153. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133153

    [6]

    HAGAN N, KANE J L, GROVER D, et al. CSF1R signaling is a regulator of pathogenesis in progressive MS[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2020, 11(10): 904. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03084-7

    [7]

    LIU F T, BOUZNAD N, KALLER M, et al. Csf1r mediates enhancement of intestinal tumorigenesis caused by inactivation of Mir34a[J]. Int J Biol Sci, 2022, 18(14): 5415-5437. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.75503

    [8] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 结肠癌规范化诊疗指南(试行)[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志: 电子版, 2013, 5(8): 50-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7372.2013.08.011
    [9]

    ROSLAN N H, MAKPOL S, MOHD YUSOF Y A. A review on dietary intervention in obesity associated colon cancer[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2019, 20(5): 1309-1319. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.5.1309

    [10] 邓龙廉, 孙海滨, 恩日乐图, 等. 列线图预测结直肠癌淋巴结转移的研究进展[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(5): 143-148. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20223328
    [11]

    LI X Y, WEN D C, LI X K, et al. Identification of an immune signature predicting prognosis risk and lymphocyte infiltration in colon cancer[J]. Front Immunol, 2020, 11: 1678. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01678

    [12]

    YANG Y S, LIU Y, WANG Y W, et al. Regulation of SIRT1 and its roles in inflammation[J]. Front Immunol, 2022, 13: 831168. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.831168

    [13]

    DASGUPTA A, SHUKLA S K, VERNUCCI E, et al. SIRT1-NOX4 signaling axis regulates cancer cachexia[J]. J Exp Med, 2020, 217(7): e20190745. doi: 10.1084/jem.20190745

    [14]

    AN Y F, WANG B, WANG X, et al. SIRT1 inhibits chemoresistance and cancer stemness of gastric cancer by initiating an AMPK/FOXO3 positive feedback loop[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2020, 11(2): 115. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2308-4

    [15]

    JUNG T Y, JIN G R, KOO Y B, et al. Deacetylation by SIRT1 promotes the tumor-suppressive activity of HINT1 by enhancing its binding capacity for β-catenin or MITF in colon cancer and melanoma cells[J]. Exp Mol Med, 2020, 52(7): 1075-1089. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0465-2

    [16]

    SPANGENBERG E, SEVERSON P L, HOHSFIELD L A, et al. Sustained microglial depletion with CSF1R inhibitor impairs parenchymal plaque development in an Alzheimer's disease model[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1): 3758. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11674-z

    [17]

    RAO R, HAN R, OGUREK S, et al. Glioblastoma genetic drivers dictate the function of tumor-associated macrophages/microglia and responses to CSF1R inhibition[J]. Neuro Oncol, 2022, 24(4): 584-597. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab228

    [18]

    CUI B, FAN X X, ZHOU D Z, et al. CSF1R methylation is a key regulatory mechanism of tumor-associated macrophages in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Oncol Lett, 2020, 20(2): 1835-1845. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11726

    [19]

    SHI X L, KALLER M, ROKAVEC M, et al. Characterization of a p53/miR-34a/CSF1R/STAT3 feedback loop in colorectal cancer[J]. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 10(2): 391-418. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2020.04.002

  • 期刊类型引用(6)

    1. 王莉娜,闫婷. 孕晚期基于胎心监护的临床护理对胎儿窘迫及新生儿窒息发生情况的影响. 临床医学研究与实践. 2023(19): 168-171 . 百度学术
    2. 赖锡妹,邝彩红. 电子胎心监护联合超声脐动脉血流动力学指标对胎儿窘迫的预测效能分析. 影像研究与医学应用. 2022(10): 72-74 . 百度学术
    3. 路会景,王阳,于艳艳,陈英红. 彩超检测胎儿大脑中动脉、肾动脉预测妊娠晚期胎儿宫内窘迫. 河南大学学报(医学版). 2021(04): 273-276+282 . 百度学术
    4. 张晓微. 彩超监测胎儿脐血流指标在预测胎儿宫内缺氧中的应用. 黑龙江医药. 2020(01): 188-189 . 百度学术
    5. 黄鹂鹂,林淑娟,区凯敏. 脐动脉血不同pH值与胎儿宫内窘迫的相关性及预后分析. 中国医药科学. 2020(19): 128-131 . 百度学术
    6. 袁景春,周镇光,李瑞华. 脐动脉血气分析与乳酸水平对新生儿窒息的诊断价值. 中国医药科学. 2019(23): 116-119 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(1)

图(3)  /  表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  73
  • HTML全文浏览量:  10
  • PDF下载量:  8
  • 被引次数: 7
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-06-17
  • 修回日期:  2024-09-01
  • 刊出日期:  2024-12-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭