基于CiteSpace软件的癌症领域孟德尔随机化研究的知识图谱可视化分析

Visual analysis of the knowledge map of Mendelian randomization studies in the field of cancer based on CiteSpace software

  • 摘要:
    目的 基于CiteSpace软件对癌症领域孟德尔随机化(MR)研究的相关文献进行可视化分析。
    方法 在Web of Science核心合集数据库中检索癌症领域MR研究的英文文献, 在中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库中检索中文文献,检索时间范围为建库至2024年4月18日。应用CiteSpace 6.3.R1软件对纳入文献的发文趋势、作者、机构和关键词进行知识图谱可视化分析。
    结果 本研究共纳入英文文献964篇和中文文献121篇,癌症领域MR研究的中英文文献年度发文量总体呈上升趋势,但作者及机构间的合作均较少。中英文文献关键词分析结果显示,乳腺癌、结直肠癌、肺癌、前列腺癌、胃癌等为重点癌种,性激素、腰背痛等为主要关联因素; 持续5年以上的研究热点包括遗传多态性、结直肠癌、全基因组关联,近几年的研究热点主要为胰岛素、肾细胞癌及子宫内膜癌。
    结论 MR研究已在癌症领域广泛开展并成为研究热点,但作者及机构间的合作仍有待加强。研究方法学本身的局限性会导致MR研究证据的有力程度较低、不同研究结果存在冲突等现象,未来MR研究应结合其他学科和流行病学研究方法,以提供更全面的因果证据。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To conduct a visual analysis of the literature related to Mendelian randomization (MR) studies in the field of cancer based on CiteSpace software.
    Methods English literature on MR studies in the field of cancer was searched in the Web of Science Core Collection database, and Chinese literature was searched in CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP databases. The search period ranged from the inception of the databases to April 18, 2024. CiteSpace 6.3.R1 software was used to perform a visual analysis of the publication trends, authors, institutions, and keywords of the included literature through knowledge mapping.
    Results A total of 964 English articles and 121 Chinese articles were included in this study. The annual publication of English and Chinese literature on MR studies in the field of cancer showed an overall upward trend, but there was limited collaboration among authors and institutions. The analysis of keywords in both English and Chinese literature revealed that breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, and gastric cancer were the key cancer types, with sex hormones and low back pain as the main associated factors. Research hotspots lasting for more than five years included genetic polymorphism, colorectal cancer, and genome-wide association studies. The recent research hotspots focused on insulin, renal cell carcinoma, and endometrial cancer.
    Conclusion MR studies have been extensively conducted in the field of cancer and have become a research hotspot. However, collaboration among authors and institutions still need to be strengthened. The inherent limitations of the research methodology itself can lead to issues such as insufficiency of MR study evidence and conflicting results among different studies. Future MR studies should integrate other disciplines and epidemiological research methods to provide more comprehensive causal evidence.

     

/

返回文章
返回