仙鹤草-白术对腹泻型肠易激综合征脾虚湿阻证患者的疗效观察

张梓岗, 翟金海, 汤瑜

张梓岗, 翟金海, 汤瑜. 仙鹤草-白术对腹泻型肠易激综合征脾虚湿阻证患者的疗效观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(14): 114-117, 122. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20231157
引用本文: 张梓岗, 翟金海, 汤瑜. 仙鹤草-白术对腹泻型肠易激综合征脾虚湿阻证患者的疗效观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(14): 114-117, 122. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20231157
ZHANG Zigang, ZHAI Jinhai, TANG Yu. Effect of Xianhecao-Baizhu in treatment of diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome with spleen deficiency and dampness type[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(14): 114-117, 122. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20231157
Citation: ZHANG Zigang, ZHAI Jinhai, TANG Yu. Effect of Xianhecao-Baizhu in treatment of diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome with spleen deficiency and dampness type[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(14): 114-117, 122. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20231157

仙鹤草-白术对腹泻型肠易激综合征脾虚湿阻证患者的疗效观察

基金项目: 

江苏省名老中医药专家传承工作室建设项目 (2011)80号

江苏省名老中医药专家学术经验继承工作专项资金资助项目 (2009)69号

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    翟金海, E-mail: 911014707@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: R574;R24

Effect of Xianhecao-Baizhu in treatment of diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome with spleen deficiency and dampness type

  • 摘要:
    目的 

    探讨仙鹤草-白术治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征脾虚湿阻证的临床效果及机制。

    方法 

    将120例患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组60例。治疗组予以仙鹤草-白术汤剂口服治疗,对照组予以培菲康联合蒙脱石散口服治疗,疗程1个月。观察治疗后2组主要症状改善情况、综合疗效以及治疗前后血清5-羟色胺(5-HT)、白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)水平。

    结果 

    治疗组腹胀或腹痛症状改善率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗组总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。2组治疗后血清5-HT、IL-1β均下降,但治疗组较对照组下降更明显,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗后, 2组腹痛积分和腹泻积分下降,且治疗组较对照组下降更明显,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。2组治疗后汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分和肠易激综合征生活质量量表(IBS-QOL)评分均较治疗前下降,且治疗组HAMA评分和IBS-QOL评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。

    结论 

    仙鹤草-白术可能通过降低5-HT、IL-1β的分泌水平,达到治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征脾虚湿阻证的作用。

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    To explore the clinical effect and mechanism of Xianhecao-Baizhu in treatment of diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome with spleen deficiency and dampness type.

    Methods 

    A total of 120 patients were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, with 60 cases in each group. The treatment group was given Xianhecao-Baizhu Decoction orally, and the control group was given pefican combined with montmorillonite powder orally. The course of treatment lasted for 1 month. The improvement of main symptoms, comprehensive efficacy, serum levels of 5-HT and IL-1β before and after treatment in two groups were observed.

    Results 

    The improvement rate of abdominal distension or abdominal pain in the treatment group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The total effective rate of the treatment group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, serum 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and interleukin -1β(IL-1β) levels were decreased in both groups, but the decrease was more obvious in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, abdominal pain scores and diarrhea scores in the two groups decreased, and the decrease in the treatment group was more obvious than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The scores of Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and IBS Quality of Life Scale (IBS-QOL) in the two groups after treatment were decreased compared with those before treatment, and the HAMA and IBS-QOL scores in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.01).

    Conclusion 

    Xianhecao-Baizhu can treat diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome with spleen deficiency and dampness type by reducing the secretion levels of 5-HT and IL-1β.

  • 表  1   2组患者基线资料比较(x±s)

    组别 n 年龄/岁 病程/年 IBS-SSS评分/分 体质量指数/(kg/m2)
    治疗组 60 42.85±7.52 8.13±2.34 245.46±78.66 21.67±1.63
    对照组 60 44.13±7.65 7.96±2.25 268.88±81.25 21.39±1.71
    IBS-SSS: 肠易激综合征临床症状严重程度评分系统。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   2组治疗前后腹泻频率变化

    组别 n 显效 有效 进步 无效 总改善率/%
    治疗组 60 24 24 10 2 96.67
    对照组 60 36 12 12 0 100.00
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   2组治疗前后血清5-HT、IL-1β水平比较(x±s)  ng/L

    指标 治疗组(n=60) 对照组(n=60)
    治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后
    5-HT 38.96±6.24 22.37±4.36*# 37.84±5.97 26.31±5.03*
    IL-1β 96.23±3.45 22.35±2.68*# 93.86±4.12 29.37±3.31*
    5-HT: 5-羟色胺; IL-1β: 白细胞介素-1β。与治疗前比较, *P < 0.05; 与对照组比较, #P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   2组患者治疗前后腹痛、腹泻积分比较(x±s)  

    积分 治疗组(n=60) 对照组(n=60)
    治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后
    腹痛积分 2.16±0.41 0.31±0.49*# 2.14±0.37 0.81±0.70*
    腹泻积分 4.23±0.79 0.65±0.89*# 4.26±0.81 1.75±0.92*
    与治疗前比较, *P < 0.05; 与对照组比较, #P < 0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5   2组患者治疗前后HAMA评分和IBS-QOL评分比较(x±s)  

    评分 时点 治疗组(n=60) 对照组(n=60)
    HAMA评分 治疗前 20.21±6.27 19.98±5.82
    治疗后 9.83±6.01**## 14.11±5.82**
    IBS-QOL评分 治疗前 111.40±19.75 112.28±20.42
    治疗后 64.45±10.57 79.31±11.88
    与治疗前比较, **P < 0.01; 与对照组比较, ##P < 0.01。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 杨露菡, 刘群. 5-HT、IL-18、CGRP在腹泻型肠易激综合征患者中的表达及其与症状严重程度、内脏敏感度相关性的研究[J]. 国际消化病杂志, 2022, 42(3): 179-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-534X.2022.03.010
    [2] 高勇, 罗秋红, 李玉龙, 等. 藿砂口服液对腹泻型肠易激综合征5-HT、IL-1β、IL-10的影响[J]. 福建中医药, 2018, 49(5): 70-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJZY201805025.htm
    [3] 刘新光. 2011年度中国消化病学研究进展[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志: 电子版, 2011, 3(6): 42-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXQY201106016.htm
    [4] 孙宏文. 六味安消胶囊(邦消安)治疗便秘型肠易激综合征的临床观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2006, 10(9): 87-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2353.2006.09.033
    [5] 周启航. 灸脐联合七味白术散治疗脾虚湿盛型腹泻型肠易激综合征的临床观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(5): 37-39. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20200887
    [6] 卞立群. 肠安Ⅰ号方治疗IBS-D的临床疗效评价暨临床疗效评价指标的比较研究[D]. 北京: 中国中医科学院, 2011.
    [7] 郑筱萸. 中药新药临床研究指导原则(试行)[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2002: 139-143.
    [8] 黄洋. 盐酸洛哌丁胺联合痛泻宁颗粒对腹泻型肠易激综合征的临床疗效[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(10): 114-116. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20223223
    [9] 王克俭, 杨勤. 疏肝和中汤治疗肝郁脾虚证腹泻型肠易激综合征的疗效观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(23): 58-61, 68. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20213488
    [10]

    LIU J S, HOU X H. A review of the irritable bowel syndrome investigation on epidemiology, pathogenesis and pathophysiology in China[J]. J Gastro And Hepatol, 2011, 26(s3): 88-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06641.x

    [11] 韩秀秀, 李晟玮. 黄厚止泻滴丸治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征的效果[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(22): 107-110. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20222330
    [12] 冯小丽, 伍小鱼. 奥替溴铵联合益生菌对腹泻型肠易激综合征患者胃动素及血管活性肠肽水平的影响[J]. 医疗装备, 2019, 32(22): 118-119. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2019.22.077
    [13] 廖路敏, 王娇娇, 储浩然, 等. 艾灸干预腹泻型肠易激综合征大鼠miR-24/SERT/5-HT通路改善内脏高敏感状态实验观察[J]. 安徽中医药大学学报, 2022, 41(5): 59-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-7246.2022.05.015
    [14]

    COLLINS S M, PICHE T, RAMPAL P. The putative role of inflammation in the irritable bowel syndrome[J]. Gut, 2001, 49(6): 743-745. doi: 10.1136/gut.49.6.743

    [15] 史先芳, 尚精娟, 徐晖. 艾灸对肠易激综合征模型大鼠IL-1β、IL-10和CGRP表达的影响[J]. 哈尔滨医科大学学报, 2021, 55(5): 462-465. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1905.2021.05.003
    [16]

    BINSHTOK A M, WANG H B, ZIMMERMANN K, et al. Nociceptors are interleukin-1beta sensors[J]. J Neurosci, 2008, 28(52): 14062-14073. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3795-08.2008

    [17] 冯骅, 丁敏, 张雪. 针刺联合隔饼腹灸法治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征临床研究[J]. 河北中医, 2020, 42(1): 115-117, 124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBZY202001024.htm
    [18] 花海兵, 向培, 夏秋钰, 等. 袁士良清化立论诊疗经验述要[J]. 辽宁中医药大学学报, 2013, 15(6): 122-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LZXB201306051.htm
    [19] 田琳, 刘启泉, 张娜娜, 等. 节点治疗在慢性非特异性溃疡性结肠炎中的临床应用[J]. 河北中医, 2016, 38(12): 1880-1883. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2619.2016.12.031
表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  129
  • HTML全文浏览量:  36
  • PDF下载量:  3
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-04-11
  • 修回日期:  2023-06-16
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-07-19
  • 刊出日期:  2024-07-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭