茅宇仑, 周强, 张平超. 自体与异体肌腱微创移植重建踝关节外侧韧带的对比研究[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2014, (17): 59-62. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201417017
引用本文: 茅宇仑, 周强, 张平超. 自体与异体肌腱微创移植重建踝关节外侧韧带的对比研究[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2014, (17): 59-62. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201417017
MAO Yulun, ZHOU Qiang, ZHANG Pingchao. Comparative study of autologous and allogeneic tendon for reconstruction of the ligaments of the lateral ankle by minimally invasive transplantation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (17): 59-62. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201417017
Citation: MAO Yulun, ZHOU Qiang, ZHANG Pingchao. Comparative study of autologous and allogeneic tendon for reconstruction of the ligaments of the lateral ankle by minimally invasive transplantation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (17): 59-62. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201417017

自体与异体肌腱微创移植重建踝关节外侧韧带的对比研究

Comparative study of autologous and allogeneic tendon for reconstruction of the ligaments of the lateral ankle by minimally invasive transplantation

  • 摘要: 目的:对比自体与异体肌腱微创移植重建踝关节外侧韧带的疗效差异。方法选取2008年1月-2012年1月行微创移植术重建踝关节外侧韧带患者70例,分为自体组36例和异体组34例。2组均行微创移植术重建踝关节外侧韧带,自体组采用同侧患肢内侧的半腱肌肌腱进行移植,异体组采用同种异体韧带,术后均给予相同的康复训练。结果自体组的手术时间显著长于异体组(P<0.01),发热和伤口愈合时间则显著少于异体组(P<0.05或P<0.01);2组术后1年的踝与外足评分、距骨倾斜角及距骨迁移距离均显著改善(P<0.01),但组间无显著差异(P>0.05);随访2年后,自体组疗效优良率为74.29%,与异体组68.75%比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论自体与异体肌腱微创移植重建踝关节外侧韧带各有利弊,临床应用时应根据患者具体情况进行选择。

     

    Abstract: Obj ective To compare the difference of therapeutic efficacy of autologous and allogenic tendon for reconstruction of the ligaments of the lateral ankle by minimally invasive trans-plantation.Methods A total of 70 patients with reconstruction of the ligaments of the lateral ankle by minimally invasive transplantation were selected and divided into autologous group (36 cases)and allogenic group (34 cases).Patients of 2 groups were performed with minimally invasive transplan-tation for reconstruction of the ligaments of the lateral ankle.Autologous group adopted semitendi-nosus tendon of the inside of ipsilateral limb for transplantation and allogenic group adopted allograft ligaments.The same rehabilitation training was given for 2 groups after transplantation.Results The time of transplantation in autologous group was significantly longer than allogenic group (P<0 .0 1 )but the time of fever and wound healing of autologous group was shorter than allogenic group (P<0.05,or P<0.01).The score of ankle and exopodal,slant angle and migration distance of astragalus significantly improved (P<0.01),but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). After 2 years of follow up,the rate of good efficacy of autologous group was 74.29%and allogenic group was 68 .75%,and there was no significant difference between 2 groups (P>0 .05 ).Conclu-sion Either Autologous tendon or allogenic tendon has advantages and disadvantages in reconstruc-tion of the ligaments of the lateral ankle by minimally invasive transplantation,the operation should be selected according to the condition of the patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回