陈凯, 唐小山, 杨启祥, 杨华伟, 严雪喻, 唐凤琴, 尚光伟. 碧兰麻与利多卡因在牙体牙髓病麻醉治疗中的效果及安全性比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2014, (17): 130-132. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201417044
引用本文: 陈凯, 唐小山, 杨启祥, 杨华伟, 严雪喻, 唐凤琴, 尚光伟. 碧兰麻与利多卡因在牙体牙髓病麻醉治疗中的效果及安全性比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2014, (17): 130-132. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201417044
CHEN Kai, TANG Xiaoshan, YANG Qixiang, YANG Huawei, YAN Xueyu, TANG Fengqin, SHANG Guangwei. Comparison of efficacy and safety between primacaine and lidocaine for tooth pulp disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (17): 130-132. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201417044
Citation: CHEN Kai, TANG Xiaoshan, YANG Qixiang, YANG Huawei, YAN Xueyu, TANG Fengqin, SHANG Guangwei. Comparison of efficacy and safety between primacaine and lidocaine for tooth pulp disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (17): 130-132. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201417044

碧兰麻与利多卡因在牙体牙髓病麻醉治疗中的效果及安全性比较

Comparison of efficacy and safety between primacaine and lidocaine for tooth pulp disease

  • 摘要: 目的:比较碧兰麻与利多卡因治疗牙体牙髓病的麻醉效果及安全性。方法将150例牙体牙髓病患者的178颗患牙随机分成观察组及对照组,每组75例患者(89颗患牙)。观察组使用碧兰麻麻醉治疗,对照组使用利多卡因麻醉治疗。比较2组患者麻醉起效时间、麻醉效果及不良反应发生率。结果观察组麻醉起效时间明显快于对照组,麻醉有效率明显优于对照组;观察组与对照组注药后即刻、注射药3 min、5 min收缩压变化比较无显著差异,舒张压、心率变化比较有显著差异;观察组不良反应发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论与利多卡因比较,碧兰麻用于牙体牙髓病治疗起效快,麻醉效果好,血压、心率波动小,不良反应少,是一种安全有效的麻醉药物。

     

    Abstract: Obj ective To compare efficacy and safety between primacaine and lidocaine for tooth pulp disease.Methods 150 patients with tooth pulp disease (150 ill teeth)were randomly di-vided into observation group and control group,75 patients (89 ill teeth)in each group.Observa-tion group was treated with the primacaine anesthesia treatment,while the control group was treat-ed with lidocaine anesthesia treatment.Anesthesia effect time,anesthetic effect and adverse reac-tions were compared.Results Anesthesia effect time in the observation group was significantly faster than the control group;and anesthesia effective rate was better than control group.At the time points of immediately after inj ection,3 and 5 minutes after inj ection,there was no significant changes in systolic pressures between observation group and control group,there were significant differences of diastolic blood pressure,heart rate.Incidence rate of adverse reactions in observation group was significant lower than the control group (P<0 .05 ).Conclusion Compared with lido-caine,primacaine for tooth pulp disease has a fast response time,a good anaesthesia effect,small blood pressure and heart rate changes and less adverse reaction,so it is a safe and effective anesthetic drug.

     

/

返回文章
返回