段秋燕, 王琴丽. 急性心肌梗死患者标准化抢救护理流程的实践[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(14): 52-55. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201914014
引用本文: 段秋燕, 王琴丽. 急性心肌梗死患者标准化抢救护理流程的实践[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(14): 52-55. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201914014
DUAN Qiuyan, WANG Qinli. Application of standardized rescue nursing process in rescue of acute myocardial infarction[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(14): 52-55. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201914014
Citation: DUAN Qiuyan, WANG Qinli. Application of standardized rescue nursing process in rescue of acute myocardial infarction[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(14): 52-55. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201914014

急性心肌梗死患者标准化抢救护理流程的实践

Application of standardized rescue nursing process in rescue of acute myocardial infarction

  • 摘要:
      目的  探讨标准化抢救护理流程在急性心肌梗死(AMI)抢救中的应用价值。
      方法  将100例AMI患者随机分为对照组(常规护理方案救治)与观察组(标准化抢救护理流程救治)各50例, 比较2组分诊评估时间、首份心电图采集时间、抢救时间、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、抢救成功率、护理满意度、住院时间及不良事件发生率。
      结果  观察组分诊评估时间、首份心电图采集时间、抢救时间显著短于对照组(P < 0.05); 2组干预后SAS评分、SDS评分显著低于干预前,且观察组显著低于对照组(P < 0.05); 观察组抢救成功率、护理满意度显著高于对照组,住院时间显著短于对照组(P < 0.05); 观察组不良事件发生率8.00%, 显著低于对照组24.00%(P < 0.05)。
      结论  标准化抢救护理流程能缩短AMI患者诊治时间,缓解不良情绪,提高救治成功率,减少不良事件的发生。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore the application value of standardized rescue nursing process in rescue of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
      Methods  Totally 100 AMI patients were randomly divided into control group (routine nursing program for rescue) and observation group (standardized rescue nursing process for rescue), with 50 cases in each group. The triage evaluation time, acquisition time of the first electrocardiogram (ECG), rescue time, Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) score, rescue success rate, nursing satisfaction degree, hospitalization time, and incidence rate of adverse events were compared between the two groups.
      Results  The triage evaluation time, acquisition time of the first ECG and rescue time in observation group were significantly shorter than those in control group (P < 0.05). After intervention, SAS score and SDS score in both groups significantly decreased, and the scores mentioned above in observation group were significantly lower than those in control group (P < 0.05). The rescue success rate and nursing satisfaction degree of observation group were significantly higher than those of control group, while hospitalization time was significantly shorter than that of control group (P < 0.05). The incidence rate of adverse events in observation group was 8.00%, which was significantly lower than 24.00% in control group (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  Application of standardized rescue nursing process in rescue for AMI patients plays positive roles in shortening time of diagnosis and treatment, alleviating adverse emotions, increasing rescue success rate and reducing incidence of adverse events.

     

/

返回文章
返回