蔡敏, 高璐璐, 龚文静, 曹程飞, 陈玉芳. 中药溻渍技术与中药熏蒸技术在非缺血性糖尿病足坏疽患者护理中的效果比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(15): 112-115. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201915031
引用本文: 蔡敏, 高璐璐, 龚文静, 曹程飞, 陈玉芳. 中药溻渍技术与中药熏蒸技术在非缺血性糖尿病足坏疽患者护理中的效果比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(15): 112-115. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201915031
CAI Min, GAO Lulu, GONG Wenjing, CAO Chengfei, CHEN Yufang. Fomentation versus fumigation with traditional Chinese drugs in nursing of patients with non-ischemic diabetic foot gangrene[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(15): 112-115. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201915031
Citation: CAI Min, GAO Lulu, GONG Wenjing, CAO Chengfei, CHEN Yufang. Fomentation versus fumigation with traditional Chinese drugs in nursing of patients with non-ischemic diabetic foot gangrene[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(15): 112-115. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201915031

中药溻渍技术与中药熏蒸技术在非缺血性糖尿病足坏疽患者护理中的效果比较

Fomentation versus fumigation with traditional Chinese drugs in nursing of patients with non-ischemic diabetic foot gangrene

  • 摘要:
      目的  比较中药溻渍技术与中药熏蒸技术在非缺血性糖尿病足坏疽(筋疽)患者护理中的效果。
      方法  选取住院糖尿病筋疽患者160例,随机分为溻渍组与熏蒸组各80例,分别运用中药溻渍技术与中药熏蒸技术进行护理,比较2组的总有效率、依从率和满意情况。
      结果  2组总有效率无显著差异(P>0.05), 但熏蒸组依从率及满意患者例数均显著优于溻渍组(P < 0.05)。
      结论  中药熏蒸较中药溻渍操作方法更为安全、科学、简便,易于患者接受。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To compare the efficiency between fomentation with traditional Chinese drugs and fumigation with traditional Chinese drugs in nursing of patients with non-ischemic diabetic foot gangrene (tendon gangrene).
      Methods  Totally 160 patients with diabetic tendon gangrene were selected and randomly divided into fomentation group and fumigation group, given fomentation therapy and fumigation therapy respectively on the basis of traditional Chinese drugs. The total effective rate, compliance rate and satisfaction degree of the two groups were compared.
      Results  There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups (P>0.05), but the compliance rate and the number of satisfied patients in the fumigation group were significantly better than those in the fomentation group (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  Compared with fomentation with traditional Chinese drugs, fumigation with traditional Chinese drugs is more safe, scientific, simple and easy for patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回