段永涛, 刘接班, 李瑞花. 去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷治疗急性髓系白血病患者的效果观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(12): 93-96. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202012026
引用本文: 段永涛, 刘接班, 李瑞花. 去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷治疗急性髓系白血病患者的效果观察[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(12): 93-96. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202012026
DUAN Yongtao, LIU Jieban, LI Ruihua. Effect observation of idarubicin combined with cytarabine in treatment of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(12): 93-96. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202012026
Citation: DUAN Yongtao, LIU Jieban, LI Ruihua. Effect observation of idarubicin combined with cytarabine in treatment of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(12): 93-96. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202012026

去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷治疗急性髓系白血病患者的效果观察

Effect observation of idarubicin combined with cytarabine in treatment of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷治疗急性髓系白血病(AML)的效果及安全性。 方法 回顾性分析本院2014年7月—2016年1月60例AML患者临床资料,将采用去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷治疗的31例患者设为A组,将采用柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷治疗的29例患者设为B组,比较2组临床疗效、安全性、3年生存率。 结果 A组总有效率为93.55%, 显著高于B组的72.41%(P<0.05)。2组患者均出现了较为严重的骨髓抑制、Ⅲ~Ⅳ期血液学毒副作用,但2组血液学毒性反应比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。2组化疗后非血液学不良反应如恶心呕吐、口腔感染、肠胃炎、肝肾功能受损、上呼吸道感染、泌尿系统感染、皮肤感染、肺部感染、败血症发生率比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。A组3年总生存率为48.39%, 无进展生存率为35.48%, B组3年总生存率为38.71%, 无进展生存率为29.03%, 2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 去甲氧柔红霉素联合阿糖胞苷治疗AML的疗效显著,但用药期间存在明显的骨髓抑制反应,不良反应发生率也较高,与采用柔红霉素治疗患者的3年总生存率与3年无进展生存率无显著差异。

     

    Abstract: Objective To explore the effect and safety of idarubicin combined with cytarabine in treatment of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia(AML). Methods Clinical materials of 60 AML patients from July 2014 to January 2016 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed, and 31 patients treated with idarubicin and cytarabine were selected as group A, while 29 patients treated with daunorubicin and cytarabine were selected as group B. The clinical effect, safety and 3-year survival rate were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of group A was 93.55%, which was significantly higher than 72.41% in group B(P<0.05). There were severe myelosuppression and stage III to IV hematologic side effects in both groups, but there was no significant difference in hematologic toxicity between the two groups(P>0.05). There were no significant differences in incidence rates of non-hematology adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting, oral infection, gastroenteritis, impaired liver function, upper respiratory tract infection, urinary system infection, skin infection, lung infection or sepsis between the two groups(P>0.05). The 3-year overall survival rate and progression-free survival rate in group A were 48.39% and 35.48%, which showed no significant differences when compared to 38.71% and 29.03% in group B(P>0.05). Conclusion The combination of idarubicin and cytarabine is effective in treatment of patients with AML, but there is significant myelosuppression during the treatment, and the incidence of adverse reactions is high. There are no significant differences in the 3-year overall survival rate and 3-year progression-- free survival rate between two groups.

     

/

返回文章
返回