熊师, 孙长胜, 林翠玲. 皮肤软组织扩张术与复合皮移植对烧伤患者创面愈合及皮肤血运恢复时间的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(13): 26-28. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202013008
引用本文: 熊师, 孙长胜, 林翠玲. 皮肤软组织扩张术与复合皮移植对烧伤患者创面愈合及皮肤血运恢复时间的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(13): 26-28. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202013008
XIONG Shi, SUN Changsheng, LIN Cuiling. Effect of skin soft tissue expansion and composite skin transplantation on recovery time of wound healing and skin blood supply in burn patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(13): 26-28. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202013008
Citation: XIONG Shi, SUN Changsheng, LIN Cuiling. Effect of skin soft tissue expansion and composite skin transplantation on recovery time of wound healing and skin blood supply in burn patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(13): 26-28. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202013008

皮肤软组织扩张术与复合皮移植对烧伤患者创面愈合及皮肤血运恢复时间的影响

Effect of skin soft tissue expansion and composite skin transplantation on recovery time of wound healing and skin blood supply in burn patients

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨皮肤软组织扩张术与复合皮移植对烧伤患者创面愈合时间及皮肤血运恢复时间的影响。 方法 回顾性分析79例烧伤患者的临床资料,将采用复合皮移植治疗的39例患者纳入对照组,将采用皮肤软组织扩张术治疗的40例患者纳入研究组。比较分析2组临床疗效、创面愈合时间、皮肤血运恢复时间及术后并发症发生情况。 结果 研究组的临床治疗效果优于对照组,创面愈合时间及皮肤血运恢复时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 研究组并发症总发生率略低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 与复合皮移植比较,皮肤软组织扩张术对烧伤患者的临床疗效更为显著,可有效缩短创面愈合时间及皮肤血运恢复时间,减少术后并发症,且安全性高。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of skin soft tissue expansion and composite skin transplantation on recovery time of wound healing and skin blood supply in burn patients. Methods The clinical data of 79 patients with burn in our hospital was retrospectively analyzed. A total of 39 patients with composite skin transplantation were included in control group, and 40 patients with skin soft tissue expansion were included in research group. The clinical efficacy, wound healing time and recovery time of skin blood supply, and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the clinical curative efficacy was better, and the wound healing time and recovery time of skin blood supply in the research group was shorter, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the research group was slightly lower compared with the control group, but showed no significant difference(P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with composite skin transplantation, skin soft tissue expansion in treatment of patients with burn has more significant clinical efficacy, which can shorten the wound healing time and recovery time of skin blood supply, reduce postoperative complications and ensure a higher safety.

     

/

返回文章
返回