王小丽, 唐牟尼, 张若曦. 非典型抗精神病药物治疗痴呆精神行为症状的效果[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(3): 121-126, 133. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20222070
引用本文: 王小丽, 唐牟尼, 张若曦. 非典型抗精神病药物治疗痴呆精神行为症状的效果[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(3): 121-126, 133. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20222070
WANG Xiaoli, TANG Muni, ZHANG Ruoxi. Effect of atypical antipsychotics on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(3): 121-126, 133. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20222070
Citation: WANG Xiaoli, TANG Muni, ZHANG Ruoxi. Effect of atypical antipsychotics on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(3): 121-126, 133. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20222070

非典型抗精神病药物治疗痴呆精神行为症状的效果

Effect of atypical antipsychotics on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨非典型抗精神病药物对痴呆精神行为症状(BPSD)的疗效和安全性。
    方法 选取具有BPSD的痴呆患者118例, 随机分成对照组(n = 32)、利培酮组(n = 22)、喹硫平组(n = 29)、奥氮平组(n = 35)。随访治疗16周,采用神经精神问卷(NPI)量表评估药物疗效; 采用简明精神状态量表(MMSE)评估患者认知功能; 采用日常生活能力量表(ADL)评估患者日常生活能力; 采用副反应量表(TESS)评估药物相关不良反应。
    结果 奥氮平组、喹硫平组在各个访视点的NPI评分低于基线期,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001);利培酮组在第8周末的NPI评分低于基线期,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。对照组第16周ADL、工具性日常生活能力量表(IADL)、躯体生活自理量表(PSMS)得分均高于基线期,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。利培酮组口干的发生率高于喹硫平组和奥氮平组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论 利培酮组、喹硫平组、奥氮平组及对照组痴呆患者的BPSD均有改善,其中3组药物组的疗效优于对照组,奥氮平组及喹硫平组疗效优于利培酮组, 3组药物组安全性无显著差异。此外,使用非典型抗精神病药物治疗可能有助于减轻BPSD对痴呆患者日常生活能力的损害。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of atypical antipsychotics in treating behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD).
    Methods A total of 118 dementia patients with BPSD were randomly divided into control group (n = 32), risperidone group (n = 22), quetiapine group (n = 29) and olanzapine group (n = 32). After 16 weeks of follow-up, negative polarity item (NPI) was used to evaluate the drug efficacy; Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to assess the cognitive function of patients; Activities of Daily Living (ADL) was used to assess patients' daily living ability; Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) was used to evaluate drug-related adverse reactions.
    Results The NPI scores at each visit site in the olanzapine group and quetiapine group were significantly lower than those in the baseline period (P < 0.001); the NPI score at the end of eighth week in the risperidone group was significantly lower than that baseline period (P < 0.05). The scores of ADL, Instrumental Ability of Daily Living Scale (IADL) and Physical Life Self-care Scale (PSMS) in the control group at the 16th week were significantly higher than those in baseline period (P < 0.05). The incidence of dry mouth in the risperidone group was significantly higher than that in the quetiapine and olanzapine groups (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion The BPSD of dementia patients in the risperidone group, quetiapine group, olanzapine group and control group is improved. The efficacy of the three drug groups is better than that of the control group, and the efficacy of the olanzapine group and quetiapine group is better than that of the risperidone group. There is no significant difference in safety among the three drug groups. In addition, treatment with atypical antipsychotics may help relieve BPSD's damage to the daily life ability of dementia patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回